[Vision2020] Terms of Art

[Art Deco]

  [image: The New York Times] <http://www.nytimes.com/>

------------------------------
May 8, 2013
Terms of Art By CHARLES M. BLOW

Many on the political right simply can’t get this diversity thing right —
and I deeply doubt that they want to. Theirs is a bone-deep contempt for
otherness, a congenital belief in the superiority-inferiority binary, a
circle-the-wagons, zero-sum view of progress, prosperity and power.

This became apparent yet again Wednesday when it was revealed that one of
the co-authors of a much maligned Heritage Foundation
“study”<http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2013/05/the-fiscal-cost-of-unlawful-immigrants-and-amnesty%20to-the-us-taxpayer>about
“The Fiscal Cost of Unlawful Immigrants and Amnesty to the U.S.
Taxpayer,” Jason Richwine, had written a Ph.D. dissertation at Harvard in
2009 titled “IQ and Immigration
Policy.”<http://books.google.com/books/about/IQ_and_Immigration_Policy.html?id=KvaMQwAACAAJ>

Dylan Matthews of The Washington
Post<http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/05/08/heritage-study-co-author-opposed-letting-in-immigrants-with-low-iqs/>summarized
Richwine’s dissertation thusly:

“Richwine’s dissertation asserts that there are deep-set differentials in
intelligence between races. While it’s clear he thinks it is partly due to
genetics — ‘the totality of the evidence suggests a genetic component to
group differences in I.Q.’ — he argues the most important thing is that the
differences in group I.Q.s are persistent, for whatever reason. He writes,
‘No one knows whether Hispanics will ever reach I.Q. parity with whites,
but the prediction that new Hispanic immigrants will have low-I.Q. children
and grandchildren is difficult to argue against.’ ”

Matthews continues:

“He does caution against referring to it as I.Q.-based selection, saying
that using the term ‘skill-based’ would ‘blunt the negative reaction.’ ”

Skill-based. Clever. Or Machiavellian.

In reality, it’s just another conservative euphemism meant to cast class
aspersions and raise racial ire without ever forthrightly addressing the
issues of class and race. This form of Roundabout Republicanism has
entirely replaced honest conservative discussion, to the point that anyone
who now raises class-based inequality is labeled divisive and anyone who
raises race is labeled a racist.

It’s a way of wriggling out of unpleasant debates on which they have
stopped trying to engage altogether. The new strategy is avoidance,
obfuscation and boomerang blaming.

This “skill-based” phraseology is simply the latest in a long line of
recent right-wing terms of art.

There was Mitt Romney’s “47 percent”
comment<http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/09/watch-full-secret-video-private-romney-fundraiser>about
the people who would “vote for the president no matter what.” He
continued: “there are 47 percent who are with him, who are dependent upon
government, who believe that they are victims, who believe that government
has a responsibility to care for them, who believe that they are entitled
to health care, to food, to housing, to you name it.”

That was in line with the other-ing of President Obama, whether in the form
of aspersions about his birth or his faith or his understanding of and
commitment to the country he leads. Recall John Sununu, a top Romney
surrogate, saying that Obama “has no idea how the American system
functions”<http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=TsYulKm3O7w>and
saying that he wished the president “would
learn how to be an
American.”<http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2012/07/17/537131/how-romney-spent-all-day-calling-obama-a-foreigner/?mobile=nc>

Representative Paul Ryan, Romney’s vice-presidential running mate,
blamed turnout
in “urban areas”<http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/14/us/politics/ryan-sees-urban-vote-as-reason-gop-lost.html>for
their loss, rather than their ragtag campaign operation and a coreless
nominee who was utterly inept when attempting to connect with average
voters. Remember Romney liked
grits<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/09/mitt-romney-i-like-grits-learning-to-say-yall_n_1334935.html>,
y’all.

The former House speaker and failed presidential candidate Newt Gingrich —
the one who said that poor children had no habit of working “unless it is
illegal” — told Fox News last year that President Obama was “not a real
president.”
<http://crooksandliars.com/david-neiwert/newts-dog-whistle-obama-not-real-pre>During
that same television appearance, Gingrich said of the president: “I’m
assuming that there’s some rhythm to Barack Obama that the rest of us don’t
understand. Whether he needs large amounts of rest, whether he needs to go
play basketball for a while, um, watch ESPN, I mean, I don’t quite know
what his rhythms are.”

Huh. Needs large amounts of rest and to go play basketball and watch
television. Nothing subliminal there. Moving along.

This list could extend to more than one column — including terms like “job
creators” and “we built this,” and the candidate Rick Santorum (who has
three degrees) calling the president a snob for wanting “everybody in
America to go to college ” (which is not at all what the president said).

And it could stretch back further to the patron saint of the right Ronald
Reagan’s use of the welfare queen meme and George Bush’s and Lee Atwater’s
invocation of Willie Horton in the 1988 presidential campaign.

But I think you get the picture.

The right is constantly invoking class and race as cudgels in our political
discussions; they just hide the hand that swings the club.

The rebranding of the Republican Party is to a large degree the renaming of
intolerance.


-- 
Art Deco (Wayne A. Fox)
art.deco.studios at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20130509/b44c094f/attachment.html>