[Vision2020] Study of Ice Age Bolsters Carbon and Warming Link

[Art Deco]

  [image: The New York Times] <http://www.nytimes.com/>

------------------------------
February 28, 2013
Study of Ice Age Bolsters Carbon and Warming Link By JUSTIN
GILLIS<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/g/justin_gillis/index.html>

A meticulous new analysis of Antarctic ice suggests that the sharp warming
that ended the last ice age occurred in lock step with increases of carbon
dioxide in the atmosphere, the latest of many indications that the gas is a
powerful influence on the earth’s climate.

Previous research suggested that as the world began to emerge from the
depths of the ice age about 20,000 years ago, warming in Antarctica
preceded changes in the global carbon dioxide level by something like 800
years.

That relatively long gap led some climate-change contrarians to assert that
rising carbon dioxide levels were essentially irrelevant to the earth’s
temperature — a side effect of planetary warming, perhaps, but not the
cause.

Mainstream climate scientists rejected that view and argued that carbon
dioxide, while it certainly did not initiate the end of the ice age, played
a vital role in the feedback loops that caused a substantial warming.
Still, a long gap between initial increases of temperature and of carbon
dioxide was somewhat difficult for the scientists to explain.

A wave of new research in the last few years has raised the likelihood that
there was actually a small gap, if any.

The latest paper
<http://www.sciencemag.org/content/339/6123/1060.abstract>was led by
Frédéric Parrenin of the University of Grenoble, in France, and
is scheduled for publication on Friday in the journal Science. Using
relatively new, high-precision chemical techniques, his group sought to
reconstruct the exact timing of the events that ended the ice age.

Scientists have long known that ice ages are caused by variations in the
earth’s orbit around the sun. When an intensification of sunlight initiates
the end of an ice age, they believe, carbon dioxide is somehow flushed out
of the ocean, causing a big amplification of the initial warming.

Since the 1980s, scientists have been collecting a climate record by
extracting long cylinders of ice from the ice sheets in Greenland and
Antarctica, and from glaciers atop high mountains.

Air bubbles trapped in the ice give direct evidence of the past composition
of the atmosphere. And subtle chemical variations in the ice itself give an
indication of the local temperature at the time it was formed.

The trouble is that air does not get sealed in the ice until hundreds or
even thousands of years after the snow has fallen, as it slowly gets buried
and compressed.

That means the ice and the air bubbles trapped in it are not the same age,
so it becomes tricky for scientists to put reconstructed atmospheric
composition and reconstructed temperature onto a common time scale.

With its improved techniques, Dr. Parrenin’s group sought to clarify the
dating of previously recovered ice cores from Antarctica. Instead of the
800-year lag between temperature and carbon dioxide increases found in some
previous research, their work suggests that the lag as the ice age started
to end was less than 200 years, and possibly there was no lag at all.

“Before, because of these wrong results of CO2 lagging temperature, people
were interpreting it as a weak role for CO2 in the climate variation of the
past,” Dr. Parrenin said.

Indeed, though most climate scientists have never seen the supposed gap as
a major conceptual problem, it has been invoked repeatedly by American
politicians who want to delay action on global
warming<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/science/topics/globalwarming/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier>.


In 2007, for example, former Vice President Al Gore was testifying to
Congress about the science in his documentary “An Inconvenient Truth.” He
came under attack by Representative Joe L. Barton, a Texas Republican.

“CO2 levels went up after the temperature rose,” Mr. Barton said, citing a
scientific paper from 2001. “The temperature appears to drive CO2, not vice
versa. On this point, Mr. Vice President, you’re not just off a little.
You’re totally wrong.”

The emerging evidence suggests that Mr. Gore was right.

Richard B. Alley, a climate scientist at Pennsylvania State University who
was not involved in the new work, said by e-mail that it essentially
confirmed previous scientific understanding.

“What this does, again and more clearly than ever, is to show that the
large temperature changes are tightly coupled to the large CO2 changes,” he
said.

Dr. Parrenin’s paper is the third in recent years to suggest that the gap
in the climate records between polar temperature and CO2, if it exists at
all, is relatively small. And Jeremy Shakun, a visiting scholar at Harvard,
pointed out in a paper last year that the timing of the temperature
increase in Antarctica could not be assumed to be representative of the
world as a whole. When he compiled a global temperature record for the end
of the ice age, he found that increases of carbon dioxide came first, and
rising temperatures came second.

The tight relationship in past climate between temperature and carbon
dioxide is a major reason scientists have warned that modern society is
running a big risk by burning CO2-producing fossil fuels.

The level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has jumped 41 percent since
the Industrial Revolution began in the 18th century, and scientists fear it
could double or triple unless stronger efforts are made to control
emissions.

Even at the current concentration of the gas, the evidence suggests that
increases in sea level of 25 feet or more may have already become
inevitable, albeit over a long period.

“We’re just entering a new era in earth’s history,” Dr. Shakun said. “It
will be an unrecognizable new planet in the future. I think the only
question is, exactly how fast does that transformation happen?”


-- 
Art Deco (Wayne A. Fox)
art.deco.studios at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20130301/62ae51c1/attachment-0001.html>