[Vision2020] Huh?

Joe Campbell philosopher.joe at gmail.com
Tue Jan 1 10:02:56 PST 2013 

An undeniably valid point is that most shooters in mass killings are
suicidal. Most of them kill themselves or attempt to kill themselves after
killing others. There is no reason more reason to think that it will help
the situation than there is to think that it will make matters worse.

On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Gary Crabtree <jampot at roadrunner.com> wrote:

> **
>  I dunno, Gary – if you think my response was “extra unpleasant” for
> pointing out the sheer lunacy of the proposal, I think you need to read
> some of your own responses . . . and grow the thicker skin as you seem to
> expect from others."
>
>
>
> I don't expect much of anything from others and as your pal tom has
> pointed out, my skin is more than adequately thick.  I was simply pointing
> out that charging out of the chute with your shrill fishwife demeanor might
> be less then conducive to dialog. I know I certainly find it off putting,
> perhaps in your circles it's considered  charming. Either way, I was just
> asking and now the answer is clear.
>
>
>
> And, WTG!  Completely ignore the valid points I raise.  I guess that’s the
> only response you could make given the unmitigated and uncountable
> instances in which the mere presence of guns hasn’t stopped shooters, spree
> & otherwise.
>
>
>
> Did you know, for instance, that there was someone *right there* carrying
> a gun in the Tucson massacre, yet *unarmed* people had the shooter
> controlled before the heat-packing dude could do a thing?****
>
>
>
>
>
> I provided no response because your point is anything but valid. Of course
> there will be instances where good guys with firearms won't carry the day
> in that they can't be everywhere. Did the fellow you refer to in Tucson or
> the armed individuals at Columbine make the situation worse? There are
> countless situations where an armed response by a responsible citizen has
> saved lives, their own and those of others. Trying to make the argument
> that since they can't be the perfect solution in every instance, they can't
> be the solution in any instance is faulty logic in the extreme.
>
>
>
> g
>
>
>  *From:* Saundra Lund <v2020 at ssl1.fastmail.fm>
> *Sent:* Monday, December 31, 2012 10:16 PM
> *To:* 'Gary Crabtree' <jampot at roadrunner.com> ; 'Gary Crabtree'<moscowlocksmith at gmail.com>;
> 'viz' <vision2020 at moscow.com>
> *Subject:* RE: [Vision2020] Huh?
>
>  I dunno, Gary – if you think my response was “extra unpleasant” for
> pointing out the sheer lunacy of the proposal, I think you need to read
> some of your own responses . . . and grow the thicker skin as you seem to
> expect from others.****
>
> ** **
>
> And, WTG!  Completely ignore the valid points I raise.  I guess that’s the
> only response you could make given the unmitigated and uncountable
> instances in which the mere presence of guns hasn’t stopped shooters, spree
> & otherwise.****
>
> ** **
>
> Did you know, for instance, that there was someone *right there* carrying
> a gun in the Tucson massacre, yet *unarmed* people had the shooter
> controlled before the heat-packing dude could do a thing?****
>
> ** **
>
> Yet another inconvenient fact, eh?****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> Saundra****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Gary Crabtree [mailto:jampot at roadrunner.com]
> *Sent:* Saturday, December 22, 2012 6:38 AM
> *To:* Saundra Lund; 'Gary Crabtree'; 'viz'
> *Subject:* Re: [Vision2020] Huh?****
>
> ** **
>
> I thought the point here was to discuss options. Do you imagine that being
> extra unpleasant lends an extra level of credence to your point of view? *
> ***
>
>  ****
>
> g****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Saundra Lund <v2020 at ssl1.fastmail.fm> ****
>
> *Sent:* Friday, December 21, 2012 8:18 PM****
>
> *To:* 'Gary Crabtree' <moscowlocksmith at gmail.com> ; 'viz'<vision2020 at moscow.com>
> ****
>
> *Subject:* Re: [Vision2020] Huh?****
>
> ** **
>
> It worked soo well at Columbine, didn’t it?****
>
> ** **
>
> Confrontation by the armed officer  on campus & the exchange of fire drove
> one of the shooters *back into the school* to continue the slaughter.
> There’s a stellar success!****
>
> ** **
>
> Oops – but don’t confuse you with reality & facts, right?****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> Saundra****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* vision2020-bounces at moscow.com [
> mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com <vision2020-bounces at moscow.com>] *On
> Behalf Of *Gary Crabtree
> *Sent:* Friday, December 21, 2012 1:40 PM
> *To:* Joe Campbell
> *Cc:* viz
> *Subject:* Re: [Vision2020] Huh?****
>
> ** **
>
> Training to become a cop in Idaho is 10 weeks making time not much of an
> issue. There are quite a few things covered in POST that a school guard
> would not need training in (pursuit driving, crime scene investigation,
> etc. ) further reducing the time needed to get qualified people in place.
> Utilizing vets who were MP's or members of security detachments along with
> retired police officers would be prime candidates for positions such as
> this.****
>
>  ****
>
> All entry doors in a facility could be easily modified to emergency exit
> only except for one. This would make it so all visitors would be funneled
> through one door and past one armed guard.****
>
>  ****
>
> I really don't see what make this idea so unworkable other then the fact
> that it doesn't jibe very well with the anti-gun agenda.****
>
>  ****
>
> g****
>
> ** **
>
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Joe Campbell <philosopher.joe at gmail.com>
> wrote:****
>
> Scott,
>
> There was an Assistant Director of the FBI on CNN today explaining why
> this cannot be implemented. Think of the training required before you
> release folks with guns onto school campuses. Then think of the number of
> schools, the number of doors to the school that would need to be guarded,
> the costs of training and hiring an education militia, and the number of
> qualified people available for those positions. This is a bad idea that
> does not stand a chance of getting passed. Forget about it and move on to
> some actual solution.
>
> Best, Joe****
>
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Scott Dredge <scooterd408 at hotmail.com>
> wrote:****
>
> Armed security is something that could be implemented, regulated, and
> enforced much more easily than gun control, gun bans, etc.  Armed security
> guards could be subjected to more rigorous background and mental heath
> checks plus mandatory training and licensing without having that pesky 2nd
> Amendment coming into the mix.  Somewhat similar to how we supposedly have
> air marshalls on some flights.  This might be one of the very few things
> that the Republicans would actually be OK to put on the fragile shoulders
> of tax paying individuals and businesses.****
>  ------------------------------
>
> From: thansen at moscow.com
> Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 09:36:59 -0800
> To: vision2020 at moscow.com
> Subject: [Vision2020] Huh?****
>
> ** **
>
> "Before Congress reconvenes, before we engage in any lengthy debate over
> legislation, regulation or anything else, as soon as our kids return to
> school after the holiday break, we need to have every single school in
> America immediately deploy a protection program proven to work — and by
> that I mean armed security."****
>
> ** **
>
> - Wayne LaPierre, Executive Vice President of the National Rifle
> Association (December 21, 2012)****
>
>  ****
>
> http://tinyurl.com/cphq5lp****
>
> ** **
>
> ------------------------------------****
>
> ** **
>
> Seeya round town, Moscow, because . . .****
>
> ** **
>
> "Moscow Cares"****
>
> http://www.MoscowCares.com****
>
>   ****
>
> Tom Hansen****
>
> Moscow, Idaho****
>
>  ****
>
>
> ======================================================= List services made
> available by First Step Internet, serving the communities of the Palouse
> since 1994. http://www.fsr.net mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com=======================================================
> ****
>
>
> =======================================================
>  List services made available by First Step Internet,
>  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>                http://www.fsr.net
>           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================****
>
>
>
> =======================================================
>  List services made available by First Step Internet,
>  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>                http://www.fsr.net
>           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================****
>
> ** **
>  ------------------------------
>
> =======================================================
>  List services made available by First Step Internet,
>  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>                http://www.fsr.net
>           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com <Vision2020 at moscow.com>
> =======================================================****
>
> =======================================================
>  List services made available by First Step Internet,
>  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>                http://www.fsr.net
>           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20130101/53f2f50f/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Vision2020 mailing list