[Vision2020] Huge majority wants Clapper prosecuted for perjury
Scott Dredge
scooterd408 at hotmail.com
Sat Aug 17 18:13:37 PDT 2013
The question is logically straightforward. The director was revealed to have lied to Congress and he's on record as admitting to not telling the truth. Lacking any other critical information, I'd be compelled to answer 'No' to a question of 'should he be prosecuted for pejury?'
How about you Paul? Would you answer 'Yes' to a blatantly biased poll question such as this that is just begging for an answer of 'Yes'?
-Scott
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 17:19:33 -0700
From: godshatter at yahoo.com
To: Vision2020 at moscow.com
Subject: [Vision2020] Huge majority wants Clapper prosecuted for perjury
I'm curious how people here would have voted on the poll. If you
don't want to read further, here is the question that was asked:
"Edward Snowden revealed that the Director of National Intelligence
lied to Congress about whether the government was collecting
millions of phone and Internet records from ordinary Americans. The
Director has since admitted he did not tell the truth. Do you think
the Director of National Intelligence should be prosecuted for
perjury?"
Also, how much gall is there in Obama asking Clapper to head an NSA
reform panel? Is he trying to look evil?
Paul
Here is the article from Salon
(http://www.salon.com/2013/08/15/huge_majority_wants_clapper_prosecuted_for_perjury/):
Huge majority wants Clapper prosecuted for
perjury
New polls show Americans in various states want the director of
national intelligence held to account for lying
By David Sirota
There is no longer any doubt that Director of National Intelligence
James Clapper lied to Congress. Likewise, there is no doubt that his
lie runs afoul of federal law. And, of course, there is no doubt
that in terms of its implications for oversight, constitutional
precepts and privacy for millions of Americans, his lies were far
more serious than those that have gotten other people prosecuted for
perjury. The question now is whether his brazen dishonesty will
become a political issue — or whether it will simply disappear into
the ether.
As evidenced by President Obama this week attempting to promote
Clapper to head an “independent” NSA reform panel, the White House
clearly believes it will be the latter. But a set of new polls out
today suggests such a calculation may be wrong.
Commissioned by the Progressive Change Campaign Committee and Credo
and conducted by Public Policy Polling in five ideologically diverse
states, the surveys find that huge majorities want Clapper
prosecuted.
The question posed to respondents was:
Edward Snowden revealed that the Director of National
Intelligence lied to Congress about whether the government was
collecting millions of phone and Internet records from ordinary
Americans. The Director has since admitted he did not tell the
truth. Do you think the Director of National Intelligence should be
prosecuted for perjury?
In the Democratic states of California and Hawaii, 54 percent and 58
percent of voters, respectively, want him prosecuted. In
middle-of-the-road Iowa, it’s 65 percent. And in Republican Texas
and Kentucky, it is 68 percent and 69 percent, respectively.
These are particularly striking numbers because the “not sure”
numbers are relatively small. Oftentimes, Washington scandals have a
Las Vegas-style quality to them in that what happens in D.C. stays
in D.C. That often means voters don’t have strong feelings about a
controversy — or don’t feel informed enough to have a strong
opinion.
But in this case, the polls show relatively few voters expressing
such a sentiment. That suggests not only that the NSA story has
seeped into the national consciousness, but also that people are
specifically aware of — and disgusted by — the rampant lying by the
Obama administration.
PCCC is already running a campaign to try to force a formal
investigation into the NSA’s activities. Will we soon see ads by
congressional candidates criticizing the administration’s failure to
prosecute Clapper? Last week, D.C. political operatives might have
laughed at that idea.
But with these new polls, it doesn’t seem so far-fetched. In fact,
it seems more and more like shrewd politics — especially if the
White House continues to grant de facto immunity to Clapper and
others who hid potentially illegal and unconstitutional surveillance
from Congress.
=======================================================
List services made available by First Step Internet,
serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
http://www.fsr.net
mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
=======================================================
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20130817/1986a3e5/attachment.html>
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list