[Vision2020] Searching house by house in Boston

[Ron Force]

>From an opinion heard on NPR (sorry, can't remember which one): By not reading the bomber his Miranda rights, only his statements wouldn't be admissible. The government figures that they have so much evidence that his statements aren't needed for conviction.  They're more interested in any connections to others.
 
Ron Force
Moscow Idaho USA


>________________________________
> From: Art Deco <art.deco.studios at gmail.com>
>To: vision2020 at moscow.com 
>Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 7:59 AM
>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Searching house by house in Boston
> 
>
>
>I'm still puzzled why a judge ruled that is was OK not to read the bomber his Miranda rights.  This could undo the whole case against him.  This is a real question in this case since apparently information was elicited without the warning.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20130424/1649b68c/attachment.html>