[Vision2020] (no subject)

Art Deco art.deco.studios at gmail.com
Tue Sep 11 07:09:09 PDT 2012


*The Newyorker:*
Chicago’s Teacher Problem, and Ours
Posted by Rebecca
Mead<http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/bios/rebecca_mead/search?contributorName=Rebecca%20Mead>

   -
   -

 [image: chicago-teachers-strike-465px.jpg]

Not long ago, I ran into someone I’d not seen for a while, who moves in
moneyed circles in New York. We started chatting about the usual
things—kids, schools—and she told me she’d been consumed lately with
political work, raising money for candidates nationwide who were committed
to breaking teachers’ unions. She said this with the same kind of social
enthusiasm with which she might have recommended a new Zumba class, or
passed on the name of a place to get really great birthday cakes.

A certain casual demonization of teachers has become sufficiently
culturally prevalent that it passes for uncontroversial. And there will be
more talk about the virtue of breaking teachers’ unions this week, now that
Chicago schoolteachers have gone on strike. On the right, that city’s
educators are already the incarnation of evil: “Chicago thuggery
personified” was the measured description of Karen Lewis, the union leader,
provided by Michelle Malkin, the conservative commentator.

A picket line of educators rarely looks good from a public-relations
perspective, and those of us in New York who are wondering what we are
going to do with our kids when the schools close for the Jewish High
Holidays next week can sympathize with the frustrations of parents of the
three hundred and fifty thousand Chicago schoolchildren who are suddenly
without classes to go to. Meanwhile, fifty-thousand-odd kids in Chicago
still are in school this week: those who attend charter schools, which are
publicly funded but privately run, and are staffed by non-union
teachers. According
to *Chicago Business*
magazine<http://www.chicagobusiness.com/article/20120910/NEWS13/120919979/charter-parochial-schools-expect-cps-strike-to-spark-interest?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ChicagobusinesscomBreakingNews+%28ChicagoBusiness.com+Breaking+News%29>,
parents have been calling charter schools, desperate to get their children
in a classroom, any classroom, as soon as possible, even though, as
“Waiting for ‘Superman,’ ” the flawed pro-charter movie, showed, the most
sought-after charters are oversubscribed, with long waiting lists
established well before the beginning of September.

The details of the dispute are peculiar to Chicago, but the general issues
will be familiar to anyone who has an interest in education in this
country. Teachers’ salaries and job security are part of what the teachers
are asking for; but they are also trying to limit class size, calling for
increased in-school counseling services, and questioning trends toward
standardized testing, as well as questioning the assumption that low test
scores are always and everywhere caused primarily by bad teaching. Many of
Chicago’s schools, like schools in other big cities in the United States,
are struggling, and this week the numbers will be presented to prove it:
fourth-grade students scored low in math (224 as opposed to a national
average of 240 on the standardized National Assessment of Educational
Progress test) and reading (203 as opposed to a national average of 220).
Only sixty per cent of Chicago students graduated from high school this
year.

But the most compelling figure in the debate over education is that more
than eighty per cent of students in the Chicago school system qualify for
free or reduced-price lunches, which is usually taken to be a measure of
poverty. (The number in New York City is about three-quarters.) One problem
with Chicago’s schools—like schools in urban centers all over this
country—is that their constituents, the students, suffer from the usual
hindrances of poverty: having no place at home to study; having no support
at home for studying; sometimes having no home at all. Another problem is
that talk of breaking teachers’ unions has become common parlance among the
kind of people whose kids do not live below the poverty line, polite
Pinkerton agents of education reform, circling at cocktail parties. No
doubt there are some lousy teachers in Chicago, as there are everywhere.
But blaming teachers for the failure of schools is like blaming doctors for
the diseases they are seeking to treat.


-- 
Art Deco (Wayne A. Fox)
art.deco.studios at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20120911/b1eb2782/attachment.html>


More information about the Vision2020 mailing list