[Vision2020] The Petition

Sunil Ramalingam sunilramalingam at hotmail.com
Thu Dec 20 06:55:41 PST 2012


Paul, 

Just like Roger you are building your argument on a defective premise or on assumptions. You don't know how much planning 'they' put in. You say, 'If the 
      people that commit these atrocities didn't have guns readily
      available, they would have stolen them or bought them on the black
      market.'

How do you know? How do you know it would happen every time? Let's pretend one could not legally buy an AR15 variant (or any other high capacity semi-automatic). Would this kid's mother have gone out and bought one illegally? You don't know that. And in this world I just made, these guns are going to be a whole lot more expensive on the black market. How many of 'them' are going to be priced out of that market?

How do you know they're going to make car bombs? It's a lot easier to pick up the gun in the other room, or to take it our of the safe, than it is to build a car bomb.

Why should we accept your assumption, 'If these guys had really wanted to make their statements
      or whatever they thought they were doing, they could have made
      pipe bombs or a few molotov cocktails from common household
      chemicals.  They could have ran their victims over with a
      vehicle.  They could have terrorised them with a chainsaw, or set
      the school on fire.'

Well, maybe some of those things might happen, but I think it's more unlikely than not. 

I'm not advocating banning gun ownership, but I think we need to be thinking intelligently about how to control access to them by the folks who shouldn't have them. I don't think we can absolutely prevent all such access, but we can certainly improve on what we're doing now. And I think part of thinking about it intelligently is by not accepting bad premises for arguments.

Sunil 

Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 23:04:42 -0800
From: godshatter at yahoo.com
To: philosopher.joe at gmail.com
CC: vision2020 at moscow.com
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] The Petition


  
    
  
  
    

      These shootings don't just happen spur of the moment.  They are
      planned and prepared for for a long time beforehand.  If the 
      people that commit these atrocities didn't have guns readily
      available, they would have stolen them or bought them on the black
      market.  If these guys had really wanted to make their statements
      or whatever they thought they were doing, they could have made
      pipe bombs or a few molotov cocktails from common household
      chemicals.  They could have ran their victims over with a
      vehicle.  They could have terrorised them with a chainsaw, or set
      the school on fire.

      

      The sad fact is that the price we would have to pay to truly
      protect ourselves from these kinds of incidents is just too damned
      big.  We would have to give up too many of our liberties for too
      little gain.  Meanwhile, orders of magnitudes more people will die
      from cancer, heart attacks, traffic accidents, and other common
      causes.

      

      The same thing goes for protecting ourselves from terrorists. 
      It's too costly, both in money and in civil liberties, and all
      we've done is made it worse.

      

      I don't know what the answer is.  I just have an ugly feeling that
      whatever gestates from this current climate of fear and outrage
      will be worse than the current situation.  The Law of Unintended
      Consequences is real and should be given due respect.  We
      shouldn't just jump at the nearest boogie man, whether it's
      assault weapons or large magazines, without giving it the careful
      thought it requires.  I doubt we are in a position to have that
      conversation on a national stage right now.

      

      In both cases (school shootings and terrorist attacks) the root
      causes are complex and are for the most part being ignored. 
      Another sad fact is that in this world of sound bites and instant
      Internet memes no politician is going to look at the real causes. 
      They will look for the low-hanging fruit, and pretend it's more
      than just putting a bandaid on a gaping wound.

      

      Paul

      

      On 12/18/2012 09:20 PM, Joe Campbell wrote:

    
    Matt,

      

      This sounds sensible. Again, I don't have a "plan" about what to
      do. More interested in exploring solutions -- and this does just
      that. I like the idea of stronger background checks.

      

      Note too that if you think of the latest episodes of gun violence
      -- the ones we've all heard about at least -- gun theft did not
      play a role. Most of the shooters were young, as well. In general,
      the school shooters were young and required their guns from family
      members, or purchased them themselves. These are not folks who are
      stealing guns. 

      

      Joe

      

      On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Matt
        Decker <mattd2107 at hotmail.com>
        wrote:

        
          
            
              Joe,

               

              I believe some want to ban these guns but allow current
              owners to be grandfathered in. This could allow these guns
              to be on the streets for years to come. I agree with
              stronger regulation into the future owners of guns. Maybe
              a longer waiting period along with stronger background
              checks. Classes or prior military would help as well.

               

              Matt

               

              
                
                From: philosopher.joe at gmail.com

                Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 20:06:10 -0800

                To: donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.com

                CC: vision2020 at moscow.com

                Subject: Re: [Vision2020] The Petition

                

                This makes no sense. Just to use an example, if you
                  banned assault rifles, no one could steal them. I'm
                  not saying that's what we should do. But we should
                  look at ALL possible solutions. Again, research
                  Australia and gun control. Best, Joe

                  

                  On Dec 18, 2012, at 7:58 PM, Donovan Arnold <donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.com>
                  wrote:

                  

                
                
                  
                    
                      They steal the guns. So I don't think
                          the laws would change the situation, unless
                          you ban their production. 
                       
                      Donovan J. Arnold
                      

                      
                      
                        
                          
                              
                              
                              From:
                              Joe Campbell <philosopher.joe at gmail.com>

                              To:
                              Donovan Arnold <donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.com>
                              

                              Cc:
                              Tom Hansen <thansen at moscow.com>;
                              Moscow Vision 2020 <vision2020 at moscow.com>
                              

                              Sent:
                              Tuesday, December 18, 2012 7:49 PM

                              Subject:
                              Re: [Vision2020] The Petition

                            
                          

                          
                            
                              Some form of gun control has got to
                                be part of the solution. And I believe
                                all the guns used in recent shootings
                                were legally purchased. That's why some
                                form of gun control has got to be part
                                of the solution. Australia did it, so
                                can we

                                

                                On Dec 18, 2012, at 7:11 PM, Donovan
                                Arnold <donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.com>
                                wrote:

                                

                              
                              
                                
                                  
                                    Gun laws are not the
                                        answer to this problem. Not
                                        allowing for the public release
                                        of the gunman's name would go
                                        further then gun laws, as they
                                        usually do it for fame.
                                        Education of staff, students,
                                        and community members, and
                                        better protection of schools
                                        would also help. This kid did
                                        not get the guns legally, and no
                                        reasonable restrictive gun law
                                        would have prevented it. There
                                        are a host of other things that
                                        would have helped though. 
                                     
                                    Donovan
                                        J. Arnold
                                    

                                    
                                    
                                      
                                        
                                            
                                            
                                            From:
                                            Tom Hansen <thansen at moscow.com>

                                            To:
                                            Moscow Vision 2020 <vision2020 at moscow.com>
                                            

                                            Sent:
                                            Tuesday, December 18, 2012
                                            6:54 PM

                                            Subject:
                                            [Vision2020] The Petition

                                          
                                        

                                        <image.jpeg>

                                        

                                        

                                        Seeya
                                        round town, Moscow, because . .
                                        .

                                        

                                        "Moscow Cares"

                                        http://www.MoscowCares.com

                                          

                                        Tom Hansen

                                        Moscow, Idaho

                                        

=======================================================

                                        List services made available by
                                        First Step Internet,

                                        serving the communities of the Palouse
                                        since 1994.

                                                      http://www.fsr.net/

                                                  mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com

=======================================================

                                        

                                      
                                    
                                  
                                
                              
                              
                                =======================================================

                                  List services made available by
                                    First Step Internet,

                                  serving the communities of the Palouse
                                    since 1994.

                                                http://www.fsr.net

                                           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com

                                  =======================================================
                              
                            
                          
                          

                          

                        
                      
                    
                  
                
                

                =======================================================
                List services made available by First Step Internet,
                serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994. http://www.fsr.net mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
                =======================================================
            
          
        
      
      

      

      
      

      =======================================================
 List services made available by First Step Internet,
 serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
               http://www.fsr.net
          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
=======================================================
    
    

  


=======================================================
 List services made available by First Step Internet,
 serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
               http://www.fsr.net
          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
======================================================= 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20121220/14e75bc2/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Vision2020 mailing list