[Vision2020] And So it Begins . . .

[Joe Campbell]

So let me see if I understand the key points of this pro-gun policy.

1/ We have the right to "keep and bear Arms", which "shall not be
infringed," so we MUST sell guns to the mentally insane on command.
2/ The best thing to do is buy a gun and carry it with you in the
event that you happen to be at, say, the movies when the above
mentioned lunatic gunman starts shooting.
3/ Keep in mind that in an attempt to kill the lunatic gunman -- who's
right to life apparently may now be infringed -- skilled policeman may
wound you with gunfire.

Is this the general idea? Joe

On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Paul Rumelhart <godshatter at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Did it say whether or not they shot the gunman?  Or did he take his own
> life?
>
> Somewhere along the line you have to weigh collateral damage against a
> continued shooting spree.  I don't know where that equation balances out,
> but I'm sure it's somewhere between "don't shoot unless you have the barrel
> of the gun against his temple" and just spray bullets in that general
> direction.
>
> Paul
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Tom Hansen <thansen at moscow.com>
> To: Moscow Vision 2020 <vision2020 at moscow.com>
> Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2012 9:31 AM
> Subject: [Vision2020] And So it Begins . . .
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Seeya on the rebound, Moscow.
>
> Tom and Rodna Hansen
> Hamilton, Montana
>
>
>
> =======================================================
> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>               http://www.fsr.net
>           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================
>
>
> =======================================================
>  List services made available by First Step Internet,
>  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>                http://www.fsr.net
>           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================