[Vision2020] who pays for Megaload cops?
godshatter at yahoo.com
Sun Sep 4 16:54:05 PDT 2011
Who is paying and who should have to pay are two different things. If
Exxon/Mobil is paying as part of a contract they negotiated, or if they
are paying in order to keep their drivers safe, so much the better. I
just don't like this current-object-of-my-ire-pays rule that seems to
have sprung up here.
If you walk through a dangerous part of town on the way home and you
have call 911 a few times to get the cops to break up bad situations, I
don't see how you should expect to be billed for it. If you decide to
hire an off-duty cop to walk with you, it doesn't change the fact that
you shouldn't have to do so.
In effect, it's akin to fining Exxon/Mobil for having a bad reputation
amongst local Muscovites. I don't see that as a positive thing.
On 09/04/2011 01:45 PM, Gier, Nicholas wrote:
> What has been lost in this discussion and rather detrimental to Paul's
> and Jay's position is that Exxon Mobil paid for police security going
> up Highway 12 (and is still paying for it as the load sits there being
> ugly); and, according to our mayor, Exxon-Mobil is willing to pay the
> Moscow MPD for any extra costs. I don't know why Nancy would tell me
> something that is not true, so this ends, for me at least, the
> discussion about who should pay.
> Paul states,
> "As a property tax payer, I'd rather pay for general police coverage
> that way than to have to have a credit card handy when I dial 911."
> Paul, I think that is an excellent counter argument to a claim that
> people should be required to personally finance the costs of their
> legitimate emergencies to the city. But since that claim was never
> made I am unsure as to why you would make it.
> However, I am sure that many for profit businesses would be pleased to
> hear that you are willing to pay a share of their costs of doing
> business by transferring their company responsibilities to
> publicly funded government agencies they don't pay into. I am not so
> willing and generous as you are, apparently. I believe that general
> city services should be used for the general public not to pawn off
> expenses of private for profit companies to local taxpayers.
> Donovan Arnold
> >>> > =======================================================
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Vision2020