[Vision2020] No government support for NPR et al?

[Ted Moffett]

Please provide us, unless you are hiding, your actual name, address
and phone number.

I am Ted Moffett, 1097 Canyon Rd., Moscow, Idaho 83843, Ph. 208-882-8643.

I have avoided responding to your posts because I have been deceived
in the past by false identities on Vision2020.

If you have a good reason to hide your identity, and do not wish to
offer contact information, will you at least offer a clue as to why
this is the case?

Maybe you wish to live beyond the definitions of personality imposed
by modern civilization?

I feel this way...
------------------------------------------
Vision2020 Post: Ted Moffett

On 3/22/11, Glenn Schwaller <vpschwaller at gmail.com> wrote:
> Just one Campbell?
>
> After the NAACP accused the Tea Party of racism, NPR's political
> editor Ken Rudin said that the organization was “responding to … an
> ugly spectacle of members, African-American members of Congress, who
> when they came out from voting on the health care reform several
> months ago, they heard epithets from people outside, so-called Tea
> Party protesters outside. Emanuel Cleaver, a black congressman from
> Missouri, said he was spat upon. So they called – they passed this
> resolution to, you know, to stop tolerating bigotry.”
>
> Rudin didn't mention that multiple videos of the congressmen walking
> through the protesters showed no evidence that any racist language or
> physical assaults occurred. Conservative media mogul Andrew Breitbart
> offered $10,000 to anyone who could produce footage of the alleged
> spitting incident, and nobody was able to do so.
>
> oh how about 2 . .
>
> Last September, NPR reporter Terry Gross described town hall protests
> against President Obama as “a right-wing movement that has been
> interrupting town hall meetings, staging tea party protests, and
> challenging Obama's citizenship,” implying that the entire movement
> was based on wild suspicion over Obama's birthplace rather than
> rational anger over economic issues.
>
> And this doesn't even touch on the issue of $5 million dangled from a
> "Muslim Brotherhood" organization, nor George Soros' $1 million
> donation to NPR as evidence of the organization's political bias.
>
> Nope, none there!
>
> GS
>
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Joe Campbell
> <philosopher.joe at gmail.com> wrote:
>> State one left wing point of view that NPR broadcasts, Roger. Just one.
>>
>> They broadcast news. You are so used to listening to the lies on Fox that
>> you confuse them for "points of view."
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 10:17 AM, lfalen <lfalen at turbonet.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> If  NPR wants to broadcast left wing points of view and supporters are
>>> willing to fund it, more power to them.
>>> Roger
>>> -----Original message-----
>>> From: "Robert Dickow" dickow at turbonet.com
>>> Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 02:18:10 -0700
>>> To: vision2020 at moscow.com
>>> Subject: [Vision2020] No government support for NPR et al?
>>>
>>> > I hear that the conservative congressmen have proposed withdrawing
>>> > government funding for NPR. Apparently a newscaster or fund drive
>>> > person
>>> > or
>>> > somebody made some disparaging remarks about the Tea Party. Fie! Fie!
>>> > Now,
>>> > denying public broadcasting all those scarce taxpayer dollars sounds
>>> > like a
>>> > reasonable and just response to such offenses if you're a conservative
>>> > Republican sympathetic with the Tea Party movement, right? Uh huh.sure.
>>> > How
>>> > dumb can anybody be?! NPR won't suddenly go belly up and go off the
>>> > air,
>>> > slinking off into the shadows with its tail between its legs. Private
>>> > donors-- those dwindling middle class stalwarts-- will valiantly step
>>> > up
>>> > to
>>> > the plate in ever greater numbers. So what will actually happen, then,
>>> > is
>>> > that NPR will be unfettered and free to unleash all their rabid commie
>>> > pinko
>>> > liberal gun-hating womens libber staffers to say all the rabid commie
>>> > pinko
>>> > tea-barfing they've always wanted to say but didn't because they felt
>>> > compelled to be balanced in their commie pinko tree-hugging opinions
>>> > and
>>> > bleeding-heart liberal union thug biased news reporting. Clearly, this
>>> > government measure will not serve the common good. And I may be forced
>>> > to
>>> > mix even more metaphors in the future.
>>> >
>>> > Bob Dickow, troublemaker
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>>