[Vision2020] Head's Up: Sheriff's Office

[lfalen]

Saundra
I don't think that you were singled out. I do not have any inside information, but I would guess that similar calls were also made to Bouma and Associates and also the Schroeders.
Roger
-----Original message-----
From: "Saundra Lund" v2020 at ssl.fastmail.fm
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 01:41:10 -0700
To: "'Darrell Keim'" keim153 at gmail.com,  "'Tom Hansen'" thansen at moscow.com
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Head's Up: Sheriff's Office

> [NOTE:  to anyone responding, please note that I've added LCSO detectives as
> a cc recipient of this email, so you may want to remove it when responding -
> I want to make it as easy as possible for Detective Anderson to follow my
> V2020 postings.  I'll leave it up to Detective Anderson to forward as he
> thinks appropriate.]
> 
>  
> 
> Hi Darrell,
> 
>  
> 
> Hold onto your seat, but I happen to agree with you that LSCO doesn't owe me
> an apology.
> 
>  
> 
> However, please allow me to make a couple of points.
> 
>  
> 
> First, if the LCSO's "intelligence" shows me as a suspect nearly two weeks
> after PostcardGate, then the investigation is doomed.  Seriously.  I'm a
> law-abiding citizen who has never hesitated to own my statements, opinions,
> and actions, or to respond to inquiries.  I have willingly cooperated with
> LE whenever asked and whenever I've had any information I've thought could
> be helpful.
> 
>  
> 
> Whatever "intelligence" LCSO is relying on that gave them any reason to
> think of me as a suspect is . . . well . . . suspect.  I can only hope that
> they'll look very, very closely at the source of that "intelligence" and at
> the potential motive(s) for sending LCSO down a rabbit hole.  If not, then
> my tax dollars are being wasted.
> 
>  
> 
> Frankly, I'm not surprised that the quality of "intelligence" is so very
> poor.  My personal opinion is that PostcardGate won't be solved because
> solving it would be embarrassing to certain fringe elements in this
> community, a fact I suspect even the sheriff has started to recognize.  May
> as well return that Reward money to donors now:  Election Day will be over
> in fewer than 72 hours, and this "priority investigation" will rapidly cease
> to be a priority investigation, particularly when considering the
> Embarrassment Factor.
> 
>  
> 
> Second, if I'm misunderstanding my status as a suspect & Detective Anderson
> was genuinely seeking assistance, I'll say that I grew up - thanks to my
> grandmamma -- knowing that you'll catch more flies with honey than with
> vinegar.  Not calling in advance is rude enough, but rousting me out of bed
> is beyond the pale.
> 
>  
> 
> Third, surely you're not satisfied with the level of professionalism of the
> LCSO when detectives show up without uniforms & badges or even business
> cards?!  As a taxpayer who pays a full share of taxes (unlike sham entities
> who take advantage of a partial or full free rides), I'm shockingly
> disappointed at this lack of professionalism.  I've been a member of this
> community long enough to remember when the LCSO had a degree of
> professionalism that's seemingly absent now.  I'm not faulting Detective
> Anderson because this kind of direction should be coming from the top, and
> it's clearly not, but hey - people get what they vote for. 
> 
>  
> 
> Perhaps accounts such as mine will make reasonable people think.  I hope so,
> because I think it's crazy out-of-control when an innocent person like
> myself can be rousted out of her bed.
> 
>  
> 
> Please, think about that for a moment:  there's absolutely no credible
> evidence that I had anything at all to do with PostcardGate because not only
> didn't I have anything to do with it, I don't have any knowledge of the
> moron who did it.
> 
>  
> 
> Yet, I was unreasonably rousted out of bed.  If it can happen to me -
> someone who has a long history of taking responsibility for what I say & do
> - it can happen to you.  And to any other member of this community.
> 
>  
> 
> If that doesn't give you pause, then God forgive you.
> 
>  
> 
> Finally, you wrote:
> 
> "I regret that Saundra had to be awoken, but it doesn't sound like they
> stopped by at an unreasonable time."
> 
>  
> 
> This is a nit, but how do you know that???
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> JMHO,
> 
> Saundra Lund
> 
> Moscow, ID
> 
>  
> 
> The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people to do
> nothing.
> 
> ~ Edmund Burke
> 
>  
> 
> ***** Original material contained herein is Copyright 2010 through life plus
> 70 years, Saundra Lund.  Do not copy, forward, excerpt, or reproduce outside
> the Vision 2020 forum without the express written permission of the
> author.*****
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> From: vision2020-bounces at moscow.com [mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com]
> On Behalf Of Darrell Keim
> Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 2:46 PM
> To: Tom Hansen
> Cc: Vision 2020
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Head's Up: Sheriff's Office
> 
>  
> 
> The LCSO does NOT owe Saundra an apology for not calling ahead.  Cops don't
> call ahead for things like this!  An inherent part of the collection of
> evidence and statements is the element of surprise.  Give a person warning
> and you give them a chance to cover their tracks, concoct false stories,
> etc.  It is standard practice.
> 
>  
> 
> I regret that Saundra had to be awoken, but it doesn't sound like they
> stopped by at an unreasonable time. 
> 
> 
>