[Vision2020] The 2008 Legislature and SB1427 - When Idaho Gave a Damn
Wayne Price
bear at moscow.com
Tue May 25 15:26:26 PDT 2010
Actually, I see no problem with the law as written, it just needs
enforced, which it appears on the surface ICE is incapable of doing,
or there wouldn't be some 12-20 million illegal aliens here now.
If there is a constitutional problem with the law, that will be
handled by the courts, NOT vision 2020.
I am amazed by your comment, "I do, however, think there should be
general amnesty for any illegal immigrant children that spend five
years in the country graduate high school.
They didn't do anything illegal; their parents did.
They shouldn't be forced to leave their home merely because of an
accident of birth."
So, if people break a law for five years they should get a pass? THE
CHILDREN, not just the parents are breaking the law.
Now, we can argue all day about if the parents should have brought
them with them during the commission of a federal crime,
i.e. illegal immigration, but they have committed a crime, currently
on the books, exclusive of anything that the Arizona Legislature
has passed.
And you mention in that same quote "forced to leave their home". THEY
were forced by their parents to leave their home when the parents,
for what ever reason, CHOSE to break the federal immigration laws and
move to the US. We are not talking children that are born in the US,
but children born
in another country and brought to the US illegally by their parents.
The bottom line is that sneaking into the US, by a foreign national,
be they Canadian,, Bulgarian or Swiss is a violation of federal law.
A good comprehensive over view of the history of US Immigration
policy has been published by Cornell University Law School's Legal
Information Institute:
Federal immigration law determines whether a person is an alien, the
rights, duties, and obligations associated with being an alien in the
United States, and how aliens gain residence or citizenship within the
United States. It also provides the means by which certain aliens can
become legally naturalized citizens with full rights of citizenship.
Immigration law serves as a gatekeeper for the nation's border,
determining who may enter, how long they may stay, and when they must
leave.
Congress has complete authority over immigration. Presidential power
does not extend beyond refugee policy. Except for questions regarding
aliens' constitutional rights, the courts have generally found the
immigration issue as nonjusticiable.
States have limited legislative authority regarding immigration, and
28 U.S.C. § 1251 details the full extent of state jurisdiction.
Generally, 28 U.S.C. § 994 details the federal sentencing guidelines
for illegal entry into the country.
By controlling the visa process, the federal government can achieve
the goals of its immigration policies. There are two types of visas:
immigrant visas and nonimmigrant visas. The government primarily
issues nonimmigrant visas to tourists and temporary business visitors.
The government divides nonimmigrant visas into eighteen different
types, but for most types, does not impose a cap on the number that
may be granted in a year. Only a few categories of non-immigrant visas
allow their holders to work in the United States. Immigrant visas, on
the other hand, permit their holders to stay in the United States
permanently and eventually to apply for citizenship. Aliens with
immigrant visas can also work in the United States. Congress limits
the quantity of immigrant visas, which numbered 675,000 in 1995. Many
immigrant visas remain subject to per-country caps.
Early History of American Immigration Law
Congress's first attempt to set immigration policy came in 1790 with
the enactment of theNaturalization Act of 1790. This Act restricted
naturalization to "free white persons" of "good moral character" and
required the applicant to have lived in the country for two years
prior to becoming naturalized. In 1795 an amendment increased the
residency requirement to five years. The five-year requirement
remains on the books to this day.
Upon ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment, all children born
within the United States received citizenship at birth. In 1870
Congress broadened naturalization laws to allow African-Americans the
right to become naturalized citizens. Asian Americans, however, did
not receive such a right for many years. Xenophobia from an influx of
Asians between 1850 and 1882 prompted Congress to pass the Chinese
Exclusion Act, which restricted further Chinese immigration.
In 1921 Congress passed the Emergency Immigration Act, creating
national immigration quotas, which gave way to the Immigration Act of
1924, capping the number of permissible immigrants from each country
in a manner proportional to the number already living within the
United States. The aggregate number from the eastern hemisphere could
not eclipse 154,227 immigrants. Franklin D. Roosevelt's
Administration essentially closed to the country to immigration
essentially during the Great depression, drastically reducing the
numbers per country that could enter the United States.
Modern Immigration Law
The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (INA), also known as the
McCarran-Walter Act, eliminated all race-based quotas, replacing them
with purely nationality-based quotas. The INA continues to influence
the field of American immigration law. To enforce the quotas, the INA
created the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS). The INS
served as the federal agency that enforced these caps for remainder of
the 20th century.
When Congress passed the INA, it defined an "alien" as any person
lacking citizenship or status as a national of the United States.
Different categories of aliens include resident and nonresident,
immigrant and nonimmigrant, and documented and undocumented
("illegal"). The terms "documented" and "undocumented" refer to
whether an arriving alien has the proper records and identification
for admission into the U.S. Having the proper records and
identification typically requires the alien to possess a valid,
unexpired passport and either a visa, border crossing identification
card, permanent resident card, or a reentry permit. The INA expressly
refuses stowaway aliens entry into the U.S.
The need to curtail illegal immigration prompted Congress to enact the
Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) of 1986. The IRCA toughened
criminal sanctions for employers who hired illegal aliens, denied
illegal aliens federally funded welfare benefits, and legitimized some
aliens through an amnesty program. The Immigration Marriage Fraud
Amendments of 1986 sought to limit the practice of marrying to obtain
citizenship. The Immigration Act of 1990 thoroughly revamped the INA
by equalizing the allocation of visas across foreign nations,
eliminating archaic rules, and encouraging worldwide immigration.
The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act
(IIRIRA) of 1996revolutionized the process of alien entry into the
United States. The IIRIRA eliminated the term "entry," replacing it
with "admission." An application for admission occurs whenever an
alien arrives in the U.S. regardless of whether the arrival occurs at
a designated port-of-entry. Applicants at either designated ports or
otherwise must submit to an inspection by U.S. customs, even if the
applicant possesses an immigrant visa. The IIRIRA also employs the
term "arriving alien" to describe applicant aliens attempting to enter
the U.S., regardless of whether they arrive at a designated port, a
non-designated point on the border, or are located in U.S. waters and
brought to shore.
Post-9/11 Reform
On March 1, 2003, the Department of Homeland Security opened,
replacing the INS. The Bush Administration had designed the
Department of Homeland Security to foster increased intelligence
sharing and dialogue between agencies responsible for responding to
domestic emergencies, such as natural disasters and domestic
terrorism. Within the Department, three different agencies - U.S.
Customs and Border Enforcement (CBE), U.S. Citizenship and Immigration
Services (USCIS), and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) -
now handle the duties formerly held by the INS. Currently, the CBE
handles the INS's border patrol duties, the USCIS handles the INS's
naturalization, asylum, and permanent residence functions, and the ICE
handles the INS's deportation, intelligence, and investigatory
functions.
Refugee and Asylum Seekers
The Refugee Act of 1980 defines the U.S. laws relating to refugee
immigrants. Under the Refugee Act, the term "refugee" refers to
aliens with a fear of persecution upon returning to their homelands,
stemming from their religion, race, nationality, membership in certain
social groups, or political opinions. Anyone who delivers a missing
American POW or MIA soldier receives refugee status from the United
States.
The United States, however, denies refugee status to any alien who
actively persecuted individuals of a certain race, political opinion,
religion, nationality, or members of a certain social group. As a
matter of public policy, the government also typically refuses refugee
applicants previously convicted of murderer. For refugees who have
"firmly resettled" in another country, the United States will deny a
request for refugee admission. The government considers refugees
"firmly resettled" if the refugees have received an offer of
citizenship, permanent residency, or some other permanent status from
a foreign country.
Under international law, the Geneva Convention, or the laws of the
United States, foreign citizens who have become disillusioned with
their homeland cannot take temporary refuge within the United States.
The Refugee Act of 1980 specifically leaves out temporary refuge as a
form of refugee status that the U.S. government will recognize.
To qualify for refugee status under the persecution provision, the
refugee applicant must prove actual fear. A proof of actual fear
requires meeting both a subjective and an objective test. The
subjective test requires that the refugee actually have an honest and
genuine fear of being persecuted for some immutable trait, such as
religion, race, and nationality. Seekers of asylum must show a fear
that membership in a social or political group has caused past
persecution or has caused a well-founded fear that persecution will
occur upon returning. The applicant meets the objective standard by
showing credible and direct evidence that a reasonable possibility of
persecution exists upon the applicant's return to the homeland.
The President retains the ultimate decision making authority when
determining the number of refugees to allow into the country during a
given year.
Deportation
Deportation refers to the official removal of an alien from the United
States. The U.S. government can initiate deportation proceedings
against aliens admitted under the INA that commit an aggravated felony
within the United States after being admitted. An alien's failure to
register a change of address renders the alien deportable, unless the
failure resulted from an excusable circumstance or mistake. If the
government determines that a particular alien gained entry into the
country through the use of a falsified document or otherwise
fraudulent means, the government has the grounds to deport.
Other common grounds for deportation include the following: aiding or
encouraging another alien to enter the country illegally; engaging in
marriage fraud to gain U.S. admission; participating in an activity
that threatens the U.S.'s national security; voting unlawfully; and
failing to update the government with a residential address every
three months, regardless of whether the address has changed. The last
of these policies served as the grounds for the government to deport
2,000 Pakistanis following the September 11th attacks.
If the government brings a proceeding for deportation because of fraud
or falsification, the government bears the burden of proving by clear
and convincing evidence that alleged falsification or fraud occurred
and that the falsification or fraud proved material to the granting of
admission to the alien. Upon such a proof, the government has
established a rebuttable presumption that the alien gained admission
through material falsification or fraud. To rebut the presumption,
the alien must demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that
admission would have been granted even without the falsification or
fraud.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20100525/06600e69/attachment-0001.html
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list