[Vision2020] Comments to LMT story on Parks/Question

Wed Mar 31 17:21:39 PDT 2010

>From the LMT story:

"Thompson said facts uncovered in the investigation support a charge of
voluntary manslaughter because Silas Parks apparently acted after a sudden
quarrel or in the heat of passion. That is also consistent with past
instances of domestic violence between the couple that form a pattern,
including one in 2006 where Silas Parks shoved Sarah Parks to the ground, he
said."

It is nothing more than a GROSS MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE when the fact that a
man has an established history of abusing his wife is used by any prosecutor
to justify voluntary manslaughter rather than murder charges.

To me, the very fact that this murdering monster had a history of abusing
his wife makes any "sudden quarrel or heat of passion" argument a mockery of
justice in Latah County.

Saundra Lund

Moscow, ID

The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people to do
nothing.

~ Edmund Burke

***** Original material contained herein is Copyright 2010 through life plus
70 years, Saundra Lund.  Do not copy, forward, excerpt, or reproduce outside
the Vision 2020 forum without the express written permission of the
author.*****

From: vision2020-bounces at moscow.com [mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com]
On Behalf Of Art Deco
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 4:03 PM
To: Vision 2020
Cc: clords at dnews.com; jmills at lmtribune.com
Subject: [Vision2020] Comments to LMT story on Parks/Question

Comments to LMT story on Parks.  Story below.  Also, does anyone know if
Parks now has to wear an electronic monitor?

Wayne A. Fox
1009 Karen Lane
PO Box 9421
Moscow, ID  83843

waf at moscow.com
208 882-7975

_______________________

Discussion

We consider the comments section of lmtribune.com to be a key part of a
constructive community dialogue. Your comments will appear as you type them.
The Lewiston Tribune does not prescreen contributions to the comments
section. Individuals posting libelous statements may be held individually
responsible

March 31, 2010
7:21 am 

caddyshack says... 

score:  

-28

 <javascript:void(0);> up <javascript:void(0);> down

(show comment) <javascript:void(0);>  

Why does a man get 40 years in prison for killing his wife and UNBORN child
and abortion doctors get nothing? Seems like a double standard. 

Reply to caddyshack comment  <javascript:void(0);> 

Replies to caddyshack's comment: 

FTPinLWS   March 31, 2010 11:03 AM

score: 

2

 <javascript:void(0);> up  <javascript:void(0);> up

Why does an idiot seek to impose his or her religious/political beliefs at a
time when he or she should be offering condolences and support? Tough
questions
indeed. 

March 31, 2010
8:58 am 

gwshoes says... 

score:  

22

 <javascript:void(0);> up <javascript:void(0);> down

Excuse me.... why is he free on bond? he admitted to killing two people and
setting them on fire, and he is free on bond? I don't get it. so what if he
is on house arrest, he still can breath fresh air unlike his wife and unborn
child. Good grief what is wrong with this picture? 

Reply to gwshoes comment  <javascript:void(0);> 

March 31, 2010
9:28 am 

rhondagoforth says... 

score:  

3

 <javascript:void(0);> up <javascript:void(0);> down

More then just that is wrong with this picture! What is wrong with those
parents? I am sorry but I have children and would rather see there killer
rot in prison for the rest of his life then get a few minutes of grusome
details on how he killed my beloved child!!! Why would you chose detail over
justice.Who am I to say what I would do, my children are living. I would
hope that for me commen sense would over rule my passion to find some sort
of reasoning with what happened. My heart goes out to her parents along with
an apology from me and all of the others who have or will judge them on
their decision. 

Reply to rhondagoforth comment <javascript:void(0);>  

March 31, 2010
9:43 am 

Cardiff says... 

score:  

6

 <javascript:void(0);> up <javascript:void(0);> down

I think he needs a bullet to the head and just end this but that isn't going
to happen. On the flip side of the coin, because he is pleading guilty, I do
believe he does not get any appeals so the State of Idaho won't have to
retry him. Has anyone noticed that the State of Idaho is having to re-try a
large amount of murderers because of appeals. Why is that? 

Reply to Cardiff comment  <javascript:void(0);> 

March 31, 2010
10:13 am 

workingfool says... 

score:  

14

 <javascript:void(0);> up <javascript:void(0);> down

This is outrageous.Taking a plea agreement so as not to get the death
penalty. Did the Mother and unborn child have the choice to live or die? No.
He not only killed 2 people he burnt them up to cover up his crime.

The judges and lawyers may have a different slant on this whole thing if one
of their family members was murdered.

And to be out on bond is unacceptable. He plead guilty and should never
gotten out on bond in the first place let alone now that he is guilty to
continue to enjoy his freedom which his wife and child did not get to do
because he murdered them in cold blood.

Even though he had not absconded while out on bond he has nothing to lose by
fleeing now. Remember the guy that ran to Ireland while out on bond.

Haven't these ELECTED JUDGES LEARNED THEIR LESSON BY NOW?

This piece of crap had better learn to manage his anger problem in the joint
as if not he will continually get beat down by inmates just like him that
have nothing to loose either. 30 days in the hole is nothing to these guys.

I hope he has to sleep with one eye open for the rest of his sorry life.

Reply to workingfool comment  <javascript:void(0);> 

Replies to workingfool's comment: 

mg2000   March 31, 2010 12:12 PM

score: 

8

 <javascript:void(0);> up  <javascript:void(0);> up

Unfortunately the prosecutors had already decided to not go for the death 
penalty BEFORE he enterred into the plea agreement, which is why he 
qualified for bond - not sure why that is - regarless if you are looking at 
life or death, you should have to remain in jail until your tried - I would 
think the temptation to flee would be the same? I also find it 
unacceptable that he gets to stay out on bond while awaiting 
sentencing! What's the point? He's gonna have to serve time (although 
he's getting off mighty easy for killing 2 people) so why didn't he have to 
go back in immediately? I don't understand why you get to remain free 
(oh sorry, on house arrest) until your sentencing? Plus, he's probably 
gonna get credit for the time he served under house arrest. 

March 31, 2010
10:25 am 

wowmom says... 

score:  

14

 <javascript:void(0);> up <javascript:void(0);> down

I am VERY disappointed in the prosecutor's office and the entire judicial
system in Latah County. What a shame!! This man killed two people and is
getting treated with kid gloves. He deserves nothing less than life in
prison. Judge Brudie - please - sentence him to the maximum of 40 years with
NO parole. Do it for not only Sarah, but for her unborn baby. 

Reply to wowmom comment  <javascript:void(0);> 

March 31, 2010
10:49 am 

jdharris says... 

score:  

5

 <javascript:void(0);> up <javascript:void(0);> down

Gee, I don't remember Shakleford running around in 4 county's after he
murdered and burnt 2 people. What's the deal with that crap. 

Reply to jdharris comment  <javascript:void(0);> 

March 31, 2010
11:00 am 

FTPinLWS says... 

score:  

7

 <javascript:void(0);> up <javascript:void(0);> down

IMHO, the ONLY people who can define what justice is, are those who know and
love Sarah. We can sit here and judge all we want, and God forbid any of you
will ever have to really know what you would do in this situation. There is
no real justice when an act of violence takes from you that which cannot be
replaced. I, unfortunately, understand this. And I truly hope none of you
ever reach that understanding. Please consider just letting the friends and
family of Sarah cope and grieve in a manner that works for them. 

Reply to FTPinLWS comment  <javascript:void(0);> 

____________________________________________________

Silas Parks takes plea deal

*	March 31st, 2010
*	(10) comments <http://www.lmtribune.com/story/northwest/506787/> 

By Joel Mills of the Tribune 

He pleads guilty to arson and manslaughter instead of murder in death of his
pregnant wife in Moscow

MOSCOW - Sarah Parks' family badly wants to know how she died. 

With that in mind, they are supporting a plea agreement that will send her
husband Silas Parks to prison for a maximum of 40 years, Latah County
Prosecutor William Thompson Jr. said. 

"I think at this point, in addition to wanting to be assured that an
appropriate punishment is handed down, they also want to know exactly what
happened," Thompson said. 

Silas Parks pleaded guilty Tuesday afternoon to two counts of voluntary
manslaughter and one count of first-degree arson in connection with the
death last year of his pregnant wife, Sarah Parks, a third-grade teacher at
Moscow Charter School. 

Silas Parks, 26, was initially charged with two counts of first-degree
murder and the arson count. But a plea deal negotiated with the Latah County
Prosecutor's Office reduced the murder charges. It also stipulated that as
part of a presentence investigation, Silas Parks will describe in detail how
he killed Sarah Parks and then set fire to their Moscow duplex. 

The results of that investigation won't be made public, but will be
discussed at sentencing, Thompson said. 

Second District Judge Jeff Brudie set sentencing for June 8. Parks faces up
to 15 years for each of the voluntary manslaughter convictions. As per terms
of the plea agreement, those sentences will be served concurrently. 

Silas Parks faces up to 25 years for the arson conviction. Brudie will
decide whether Parks serves that sentence concurrently, or after he finishes
the manslaughter sentence. The judge will also have full discretion on how
many years of each sentence will be fixed, with no possibility of parole. 

The prosecution will recommend a total sentence near the overall maximum of
40 years on all the charges, Thompson said. 

The manslaughter pleas state that Silas Parks killed Sarah Parks and her
unborn daughter Lilly Ann Parks on June 24, 2009, without malice and "upon a
sudden quarrel or in the heat of passion," according to court documents. The
method of death was suffocation or strangulation. 

The arson plea states that Silas Parks deliberately set fire to the couple's
home at 904 Vandal Drive. The fire was presumably set to cover up the
crimes, according to police reports. 

Silas Parks will remain free on bond while he awaits sentencing, but will be
under house arrest at his parents' Kendrick property. 

Thompson said facts uncovered in the investigation support a charge of
voluntary manslaughter because Silas Parks apparently acted after a sudden
quarrel or in the heat of passion. That is also consistent with past
instances of domestic violence between the couple that form a pattern,
including one in 2006 where Silas Parks shoved Sarah Parks to the ground, he
said. 

He was initially charged with domestic battery in that incident, but later
pleaded guilty to disturbing the peace. 

The couple underwent ongoing counseling, Thompson said. But very few people
were really aware of their troubled relationship. 

"A lot of people who were friends and family acquaintances did not know
everything that was going on," Thompson said. "The investigation indicates
that Sarah wanted to keep her life private, and look at the best parts of
life." 

Sarah Parks' mother Laura Allen listened to Tuesday's plea hearing by
telephone from her home in Mexia, Ala. 

She and other family members will have a right to address Silas Parks at his
sentencing hearing. 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20100331/33dfd341/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 643 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20100331/33dfd341/attachment-0002.png 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 630 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20100331/33dfd341/attachment-0003.png 