[Vision2020] Former US Senator & 9/11 Commissoner Max Cleland
Donovan Arnold
donovanjarnold2008 at yahoo.com
Wed Mar 24 11:34:09 PDT 2010
Roger,
Clinton was not in office, and thus had no power to stop terrorists. I do not know if Bush was responsible for the attacks or not, but he was responsible for not stopping them because it was his job to do so.
Clinton was responsible for informing the next administration that there was a potential terrorist attack. The intelligence that has been released indicates he did just that.
I don't think Bush was a conservative, and he was a horrible president. I think Republicans should disown him completely.
Honestly, I think people miss Clinton and Reagan.
--- On Wed, 3/24/10, lfalen <lfalen at turbonet.com> wrote:
From: lfalen <lfalen at turbonet.com>
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Former US Senator & 9/11 Commissoner Max Cleland
To: "Garrett Clevenger" <garrettmc at verizon.net>
Cc: vision2020 at moscow.com
Date: Wednesday, March 24, 2010, 5:59 PM
I do not wish to exonerate Bush in this. I think that his people should have been more on top of it. It does seem funny to me though that Obama still blaming every thing wrong with the economy on Bush. You should remember that 9/11 occurred shortly after Bush took office. Why not put some of the blame on Clinton?
Roger
-----Original message-----
From: Garrett Clevenger garrettmc at verizon.net
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 19:42:23 -0700
To: lfalen lfalen at turbonet.com
Subject: Re: Former US Senator & 9/11 Commissoner Max Cleland
> Roger writes:
> "There has many books written,lawsuits and movies about the Warren Commission also. Anybody can write a book speculating on conspiracies. This is not proof of anything."
>
> True, anybody could write a book about anything, including a particular religion, but that is not proof of anything.
> The ironic thing is that 911 was supposedly islamic terrorist based which was leapt upon by christians, including WBush, both with religions based upon mostly the same book speculating what God wants. But it doesn't make it true.
> A lot of damage is caused by people who believe what a certain book says, so believe me, I'm skeptical about pretty much everything.
> But, common sense dictates that if powerful people espoused a certain belief as pointed out by Ted (http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf) and then that unfolds while they are in power, then I have to question that coincidence.
> I have no idea what the truth is around 911, but I do see that the consequences were way worse than they needed to be, and I blame that on those who were in power at the time.
> Since there is a lot of evidence to suggest either incompetence or purposeful malfeasance, as a conscious human I can't help but be irritated by that, and at least have an open mind about possible scenarios.
> After all, truth is often more unbelievable than fiction...
>
> Garrett Clevenger
>
=======================================================
List services made available by First Step Internet,
serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
http://www.fsr.net
mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
=======================================================
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20100324/1a6b9ba1/attachment.html
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list