[Vision2020] Why you're not getting anywhere, Ted

[Paul Rumelhart]

Ted Moffett wrote:
> What is interesting is that when I have posted scientific findings 
> that are skeptical of certain mainstream climate science views, the 
> "skeptics" who I have been in dialog with (all good scientists are 
> skeptics, so I think this way of describing the discussion is 
> misleading) have sometimes ignored my support for their skepticism.  
> There was no response to my post today on climate scientist Pielke's 
> criticisms of NASA/GISS temperature data. 

My apologies, sir.  I haven't yet had the time to give the articles 
you've posted more than a cursory glance.  I applaud you, however, for 
addressing both sides of the debate.

Paul