[Vision2020] Raise Our Taxes
lfalen
lfalen at turbonet.com
Fri Apr 23 16:46:59 PDT 2010
Ken
You should run for the State Legislature.
Roger
-----Original message-----
From: Kenneth Marcy kmmos1 at verizon.net
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 15:03:19 -0700
To: vision2020 at moscow.com
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Raise Our Taxes
> On Friday 23 April 2010 10:22:13 lfalen wrote:
> > I do not think it would be wise to raise the income tax or to
> > increase taxes on savings of any kind. I would not be that opposed
> > to a 0.5% increase in state sales taxes if it would go toward
> > saving jobs in higher ed. This is provided that they first cut out
> > the fat at the top.
>
> Generally, I agree with what you're suggesting, but I would like to
> clarify that neither the income tax nor the sales tax rates must be
> raised. This year the Idaho legislature, at the Governor's behest,
> for the first time, ignored the fiscal forecast prepared by the state
> economist, and deliberately chose to lower the accepted revenue
> forecast for the entire state budget. Then, in robotic lockstep, the
> Legislature funded education at lower levels than previously for the
> first time in state history. Budget woes at the University of Idaho,
> and throughout Idaho education, will suffer in the next fiscal year
> not because of the chaotic wiles of the American economy, but at the
> behest of the curmudgeonly cruelty of a state political party lacking
> in leadership and fearful of various retributions from within itself
> for deviations from its own hive mentality.
>
> So, the first action that needs to be taken toward better Idaho fiscal
> management is to respect and to accept the work of long-serving and
> successful state employees whose efforts doing the same economic
> forecasting work that has been not only acceptable, but
> well-respected and heeded, during past legislative sessions.
>
> The second action that should be taken is a reevaluation of all of the
> Idaho income tax exemptions, the total value of which is greater than
> the receipts from the tax itself. For too long the legislature has
> been leaving money on the table, and ignoring both choices it should
> be making, and needs it should be fulfilling for Idaho citizens.
>
> To accomplish these actions the legislature needs members who are both
> able and willing to speak to large, important issues relevant to the
> needs of this state, not playing to crowds in adjacent or far-away
> capitals. Raising whoop-dee-doo issues in Idaho that depend on the
> actions of the Federal government for their overall success is a
> waste of time, effort, and money for Idaho officials. Our people need
> to concentrate on finding optimal solutions for Idaho problems, not
> play-acting on media-mediated stages for others' entertainment.
>
> > At the UI that means Baker, Mues and Daly-Laursen. There are also
> > several former Department Heads that only took a 15% decrease when
> > they stepped down. The former head of AVS teaches only one class
> > and advises students, but is paid more than the other AVS
> > professors. What a waste of funds.
> <[snip]>
>
> As important as these issues may be for the management of one local
> institution, they are small spuds from the vantage point of the state
> budget. An institution's significant monetary problems can be best
> addressed at the state level, and it is there that cogent, effective
> voices must be heard for an institution's present and future.
>
> Of course, this is not to minimize the need for effective local effort
> to understand and to manage with equity and integrity the people and
> resources that are available. The local executives' efforts should be
> coordinated with the Faculty Council, the City Council, and the Board
> of Regents toward these ends. The substantive contents, and who
> chooses the contents, of their decision-evaluating rubric remains a
> matter for discussion.
>
>
> Ken
>
> =======================================================
> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> http://www.fsr.net
> mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list