[Vision2020] Say What?

[Joe Campbell]

You can't tell me, on the one hand, that your monkey jokes aren't  
offensive and, on the other hand, that you're interested in RATIONAL  
DISCOURSE. You're interested in pissing people off, period.

As for rational discourse, 250 folks signed up for my logic course at  
WSU this fall. How many signed up for your class?

Let me know when you want to run up to Spokane and test whether your  
jokes are offensive or not. I'm ready when you are! Until then, we can  
assume that you know they are offensive, which is WHY you tell them.

If hiding behind privilege in an effort to insult and harrass  
minorities doesn't constitute racism, what does?

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 29, 2009, at 3:44 PM, Nous Tweaker <noustweaker at hotmail.com>  
wrote:

>
> Joe Campbell wrote:
>
> [[ Sorry for trying to communicate with you. I won't make that  
> mistake again! ]]
>
> If you call *that diatribe* an attempt at communication, It explains  
> a lot. Anytime you are interested in RATIONAL DISCOURSE, just let me  
> know. Next time you might want to focus less on "communicating" and  
> more on writing something that rises to the level of an argument.
>
> Tom Hansen wrote:
>
> [[ Apparently what Slimy Eimy is trying to say is that it isn't  
> racism if you don't use the N-word. And to paraphrase a supreme  
> court justice . . . "I may not be able to define 'racism', but I  
> know it when I hear it, read it, or smell it." ]]
>
> Tell us what racism is, Tom. My Webster's New International  
> Dictionary of the English Language (1930), despite being large and  
> certainly one of the most authoritative dictionaries of the English  
> language at that time, does not even include the words "racism" and  
> "racist." That's right, the words weren't even in the dictionary as  
> of 1930, despite the fact that today the label "racist" is  
> apparently one of the worst things that can be applied to someone.  
> Today if you label someone a racist you apparently gain the right to  
> look down on that person in scorn, dismissing not only everything  
> that he might have to say, but even dismissing him personally as a  
> human being. And yet, when our parents were children, the word  
> didn't even exist, at least not such that it would qualify for a  
> spot in the dictionary.
>
> Go check out the Wikipedia article on racism:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racism
>
> There are so many competing and conflicting ideas of what exactly  
> constitutes this greatest and most heinous of crimes that it is  
> pretty ridiculous.
>
> I am NOT convinced that race is the primary determinant of human  
> traits and capacities, and NOT convinced that racial differences  
> produce an inherent superiority of a particular race. I am NOT  
> convinced that any one ethnic or racial group is particularly loved  
> or hated by God on account of their physical attributes, and NOT  
> convinced that racial integration is against God's will. I AM  
> married to a person of another race and I would not be surprised if  
> it turned out that I have had far more close contact with poor black  
> people in the United States than anyone criticizing me here has --  
> since I was actually living under the same roof with some of them  
> prior to leaving the United States -- and yet somehow I'm a "racist."
>
> I'll tell you why I'm a "racist." First of all, I actually have an  
> open mind and am not afraid to give politically incorrect ideas a  
> HEARING. (As opposed to embracing them, mind you -- God gave me a  
> mind and I intend to use it to think for myself.) Second, I do not  
> suffer fools (such as you) gladly. I don't hesitate to point out the  
> hypocrisies and inconsistencies rife throughout the thinking of  
> people who seem to have given up thinking altogether, perhaps  
> because they harbor a fear of being seen as politically incorrect.  
> Pointing out such hypocrisies and inconsistencies is not difficult  
> in today's world. It's like shooting fish in a barrel.
>
> Something is very wrong when an entire society can be gripped by a  
> nebulous fear and loathing of something that they can't even define,  
> and which just a generation ago did not even exist in the public  
> consciousness. George Orwell had a term for this sort of phenomenon;  
> he called it the "Two-Minute Hate":
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z_C992KPzKs
>
> I'm well aware that it is often "racists" who are accused of living  
> in such a world, but I think a strong case can be made that people  
> ready to hurl accusations of "racism" at the drop of a hat are no  
> less victims of that very hate-filled mentality. "Who are they?"  
> asks the video. "They" are the racists, apparently. Shout and scream  
> at the screen all you like, Tom. I don't care.
>
> Nous Tweaker
> ===========
> Can you handle the truth?
> http://noustweaker.blogspot.com/
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Insert movie times and more without leaving Hotmail®.
> http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/QuickAdd?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutorial_QuickAdd_062009
> =======================================================
> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>               http://www.fsr.net
>          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================