[Vision2020] Voting in Secrecy

[Garrett Clevenger]

Wayne writes:

"the agreement with Hawkins was/is void ab initio because when it was executed (and remains) contrary to state law."
 

I hope that's true, but it seems the city still feels obligated to the agreement.  

Perhaps that will change in the future, but if they believe they are bound by the agreement, then they will act so, meaning they probably wouldn't challenge anything about Hawkins.  That part of the agreement is still valid despite the water deal falling apart.

This is particularly true if the GMA sponsored candidates continue to hold power...

Garrett Clevenger
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20091103/36bc3498/attachment.html