[Vision2020] Habeas Corpus at Bagram

[lfalen]

Lincoln suspended Habeas Corpus for duration of the war for activities connected to the war. This was done for security reasons and for the preservation of the Union.
Roger
-----Original message-----
From: Joe Campbell philosopher.joe at gmail.com
Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 17:42:42 -0800
To: lfalen lfalen at turbonet.com
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Habeas Corpus at Bagram

> Roger,
> 
> Your history trumps mine. What do you mean?
> 
> Joe Campbell
> 
> On Feb 27, 2009, at 10:36 AM, lfalen <lfalen at turbonet.com> wrote:
> 
> > Joe
> > What do you think os Lincoln's suspension of Habeas Corpus?
> > Roger
> > -----Original message-----
> > From: Joe Campbell philosopher.joe at gmail.com
> > Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:05:13 -0800
> > To: Andreas Schou ophite at gmail.com
> > Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Habeas Corpus at Bagram
> >
> >> FYI Hilary Bok is a philosopher. Works in free will, which is the  
> >> same
> >> area I work in.
> >>
> >> Joe Campbell
> >>
> >> On Feb 24, 2009, at 7:35 PM, Andreas Schou <ophite at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hilary Bok at the Washington Monthly has the best piece I've seen
> >>> about the habeas corpus rights of prisoners at Bagram. The previous
> >>> administration's too-clever-by-half reading of U.S. v. Eisentrager
> >>> (the case upon which the detention regime at Guantanamo) has led to
> >>> some serious, and intentional, confusion of the respective
> >>> jurisdictions of our military and federal courts.
> >>>
> >>> http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/
> >>> 2009_02/017017.php
> >>>
> >>> This article pretty much sums up what I think about Bagram.
> >>>
> >>> -- ACS
> >>> =======================================================
> >>> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> >>> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> >>>              http://www.fsr.net
> >>>         mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> >>> =======================================================
> >>
> >>