[Vision2020] back and forth bickering (sane people please disregard) was something equally irrelavant
lfalen
lfalen at turbonet.com
Wed Jan 28 11:01:52 PST 2009
-----Original message-----
From: "g. crabtree" jampot at roadrunner.com
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 07:39:07 -0800
To: "Saundra Lund" sslund_2007 at verizon.net, vision2020 at moscow.com
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] back and forth bickering (sane people please disregard) was something equally irrelavant
> "It's not surprising at all to me - nor should it be to any of us here -- that you don't bother to even try to correct what you say I got wrong in summarizing the positions you've taken here. It would be pretty difficult for you, what with the V2020 archives being open for all"
>
> That being the case hows about you take a little stroll through those archives and find a little something to bear out the following hyperbolic assertions:
>
> "he's against reproductive rights, even for rape victims"
>
> "they want a Second Amendment on Steroids"
>
> "He's content that the War on Terror has lead to the terrorization of US citizens through the erosion of our guaranteed civil liberties and put us on a path to a police state"
>
> While it's absolutely true that I believe that Roe V. Wade was incorrectly decided, that I'm a card carrying member of the NRA, and that I strongly supported the war in Afghanistan and to a lesser degree, the war in Iraq to use that as a spring board to your ridiculously overstated and incorrect assertions is dishonest and consequently THAT'S pretty much what I have come to expect from you.
>
> Other general errors in your post would include (But not be limited to):
>
> "a tax system that unfairly burdens the least among us while providing nothing but loopholes ripe for exploitation by the greedy amongst us"
>
> The wealthiest 1 percent of Americans earn 19 percent of the income but pay 37 percent of the income tax. The top 10 percent pay 68 percent of the tab. Meanwhile, the bottom 50 percent, that being those below the median income level, now earn 13 percent of the income but pay only 3 percent of the taxes. In other words, the top 1 percent is paying more then ten times the federal income taxes than the bottom 50 percent. The "least among us" effectively pay no significant taxes at the federal level.
>
> "deregulation that's caused the financial crisis that came crashing down around Bush's ears."
>
> While there is no question that deregulation had a part to play in the current financial difficulties, it is also indisputable that the problem goes back much farther than that and that your hero's in the democrat party bear the lion's share of the culpability. Starting with Carter and the community reinvestment act and snowballing with the Clinton administration and Barney Frank, Christopher Dodd and their pals who were getting rich mismanaging fannie mae and freddy mac, the problem grew exponentially worse. Attempts to call attention to, and reign in the problem by the Bush administration and a republican congress were dismissed as unfair, elitist, and racist.
>
> In an effort to bring this over long response to some kind of a conclusion, you seem to want to cast me in the role of sore loser with comments that include sour grapes, whiner, and uneducated whack job and that's fine, I guess, but a couple quick questions for you, the gracious winner. What part of the solution did you spend the last eight years being? How many times over the last eight years did I have to listen to your side shriek that "dissent is the highest form of patriotism?" What changed that made your disenchantment so noble and righteous where as my potential dissatisfaction is condemed as "divisive" and "part of the problem?"
>
> g
> From John Goodman, NR january 26, 2009- paraphrased- "Baby Boomers are about to retire. The Social Security trustees tell us that we have promised more than $100 trillion Social Security and Medicare benefits over and above dedicated taxes and premiums. That figure is about seven timed the size of our economy. If health care spending trends continue, Medicare and Medicaid will crowd out every other federal programs by mid-century when today's college students reach retirement age. This is unsustainable. We have made promises that we cannot keep."
This does not include universal health care and Social Security and Medicare payments go into the General fund instead of a lock box for Social Security. On top of this, Obama wants to eliminate taxes for those making less than $200,000. This would mean that over 50% of Americans would not pay taxes. A fair share of rich people have enough deductions and subsides that they do not pay taxes either. You big spending people please tell me just who is going to pay for all of this? If you put it all on those rich who are left it will have a negative effect on the economy. More of these people will take their money off shore. There will be less investment in new businesses and the economy will stagnate.
Roger
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Saundra Lund
> To: 'g. crabtree' ; vision2020 at moscow.com
> Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 4:33 PM
> Subject: RE: [Vision2020] Contradictory Crabtree (was RE: Say What?)
>
>
> Yet again, what an enormous crock, but that's what many of us have come to expect from you in this forum J
>
>
>
> And, how wrong you are, as usual. As everyone who knows me knows, Obama wasn't "my" candidate, let alone any kind of deity to me. I did, however, vote for the candidate out of the choices we wound up with who I thought would do the best job, a decision a clear majority agreed with. So take your sour grapes and go make some more whine - continue to be part of the problem rather than part of a solution . . . that's what you're good at.
>
>
>
> It's not surprising at all to me - nor should it be to any of us here -- that you don't bother to even try to correct what you say I got wrong in summarizing the positions you've taken here. It would be pretty difficult for you, what with the V2020 archives being open for all J
>
>
>
>
>
> Saundra Lund
>
> Moscow, ID
>
>
>
> The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people to do nothing.
>
> ~ Edmund Burke
>
>
>
> ***** Original material contained herein is Copyright 2009 through life plus 70 years, Saundra Lund. Do not copy, forward, excerpt, or reproduce outside the Vision 2020 forum without the express written permission of the author.*****
>
>
>
> From: g. crabtree [mailto:jampot at roadrunner.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 7:42 AM
> To: Saundra Lund; vision2020 at moscow.com
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Contradictory Crabtree (was RE: Say What?)
>
>
>
> Ms. Lund,
>
>
>
> I'm not sure exactly how pointing out that I will support your new god when (if) I see him doing good for the country and oppose him when he's not qualifies as whining but, I guess it's in the ear of the termagant. I defer to your mastery as eight continuous years of effort have, without a doubt, left you well practiced on the matter.
>
>
>
> I find it highly amusing and not a small bit refreshing that you feel comfortable enough in your creative writing style to forge ahead without feeling even the slightest need to anchor yourself to anything resembling a fact. The errors in your brief communication are many, and I'm just sure that you'll forgive me if (what with life being short and all) I don't bother to enumerate them. Lets face it, as one of The Chosen Ones most fervent followers it's clear that you have gotten beyond the need for accuracy and reason where it comes to your cute little school girl affaire d'coeur with your freshly minted deity. My only request would be that if you are going to do the other members of this little electronic community the service of pointing out that evil "Crabtree's" position on any given topic that you provide a cite so that the others can make a reasonable distinction between my actual stand on any given matter and what is a fantasy fueled by your freshly found religi!
ous
fervor.
>
>
>
> My most heart felt thanks in advance,
>
> g
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: Saundra Lund
>
> To: vision2020 at moscow.com
>
> Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2009 9:31 PM
>
> Subject: [Vision2020] Contradictory Crabtree (was RE: Say What?)
>
>
>
> LOL - let the whining begin!
>
>
>
> Gary Crabtree wrote:
>
> "As I said previously, if there is an issue that "our" president should come up with that I think makes America a better, safer, or less restrictive place to live, I'll support him."
>
>
>
> Note the quotation marks Crabtree uses - he's clearly wanting to continue with the divisiveness that doomed the election for the GOP.
>
>
>
> Of course, he contradicts himself here:
>
> "If BHO plans on making good on his campaign promises with regard to abortion, education, taxes, health care, the second amendment, the global warming hoax, and the war on terror, then I suspect a huge portion of the 53 million American's who didn't vote for him (once) hope he fails miserably, myself included."
>
>
>
> So, Crabtree only wants a less restrictive place to live if it suits his notion of a "less restrictive place to live" - he's against reproductive rights, even for rape victims. Let's keep them thar women broodmares! Remember, he's a staunch supporter of misogynistic "conscience laws" that enable pharmacists to refuse to dispense contraceptives, emergency or otherwise, which would certainly make America a much more restrictive place for women to live. The broken health care system folks like Crabtree want to cling to has made America a much more restrictive place to live for many regular hardworking Americans - he's seemingly proud of the fact that we are the only industrialized nation where people lose their homes due to unconscionable health care costs. The Second Amendment our founding fathers gave us isn't good enough for Crabtree and his ilk - they want a Second Amendment on Steroids. He's content that the War on Terror has lead to the terrorization of US citi!
zens
through the erosion of our guaranteed civil liberties and put us on a path to a police state - that sure seems like a much more restrictive place to live to me, and that's without even getting into the shame of torture and denial of due process to suspects. He's pleased with a tax system that unfairly burdens the least among us while providing nothing but loopholes ripe for exploitation by the greedy amongst us, especially those who benefit from the special interest lobbying they fund. Education - his solution is I don't know what, but it would likely look similar - and have results similar to - the deregulation that's caused the financial crisis that came crashing down around Bush's ears. God only knows what nonsense fills his head about global warming - it would appear his understanding of science is limited to the right-wing whack jobs who flunked science.
>
>
>
> Fortunately, the election was a resounding rejection of those like Crabtree who want keep doing things that don't work. And, I'm sure we have his sore loser whining to look forward to for the next four years. After all, this was a legitimate win for Obama, which must make the win that much more difficult to swallow J
>
>
>
>
>
> Saundra Lund
>
> Moscow, ID
>
>
>
> The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people to do nothing.
>
> ~ Edmund Burke
>
>
>
> ***** Original material contained herein is Copyright 2008 through life plus 70 years, Saundra Lund. Do not copy, forward, excerpt, or reproduce outside the Vision 2020 forum without the express written permission of the author.*****
>
>
>
> From: vision2020-bounces at moscow.com [mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com] On Behalf Of g. crabtree
> Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2009 12:38 PM
> To: Chasuk
> Cc: vision2020 at moscow.com
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Say What?
>
>
>
> I guess that it all depends on which side of the Kool-Aid jug you sit on. I can't believe that you can say with a straight face that what you might find on drudge or the freep is as over the top as some of the mindless, howling at the moon, wackiness found at kos or huffington.
>
>
>
> As I said previously, if there is an issue that "our" president should come up with that I think makes America a better, safer, or less restrictive place to live, I'll support him. On everything else I'll fight him to the best of my ability and hope for his catastrophic failure. Since I am unaware of a single issue with which I am in agreement major policy wise, I don't think that there will be much to support. If every mega leftist measure your hero puts forward is an abject failure it will hopefully discredit the ultra liberal wing of the democrat party and hasten the rise of a truly conservative candidate. All to the greater glory of our republic, in my opinion.
>
>
>
> g
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: "Chasuk" <chasuk at gmail.com>
>
> To: "g. crabtree" <jampot at roadrunner.com>
>
> Cc: <vision2020 at moscow.com>; "Tom Hansen" <thansen at moscow.com>
>
> Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2009 11:43 AM
>
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Say What?
>
>
>
> > On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 06:51, g. crabtree <jampot at roadrunner.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Remember how your side wished President GW the best? Sort of like that but
> >> without the shrillness and childish demonstrations.
> >
> > Sorry, I read a lot of blogs and new sites, across the political
> > spectrum -- including http://drudgereport.com,
> > http://www.freerepublic.com, and http://worldnetdaily.com -- and
> > "shrill" and "childish" are words that much more accurately describe
> > the conservative side of things. Other accurate words would be
> > inarticulate and ungrammatical.
> >
> > And how about wishing that Obama simply fail to successfully implement
> > those policies and agendas with which you disagree? As far as
> > conservatives go, you are the voice of reason on this forum, Gary.
> > You really don't strike me as subscribing to the
> > cut-off-the-nose-to-spite-the-face philosophy.
> >
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> =======================================================
> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> http://www.fsr.net
> mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================
>
>
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list