[Vision2020] Government and babies

[Joe Campbell]

This makes me suspicious too! But maybe I'm paranoid. He also has a  
lot of time on his hands!

Joe Campbell

On Apr 1, 2009, at 7:24 PM, Sunil Ramalingam <sunilramalingam at hotmail.com 
 > wrote:

> Joe,
>
> I believe they're all from Donovan.  They bear the usual trademarks  
> of his writing.
>
> It's easy to identify the writer.  I'm having more trouble  
> identifying his ideology.  Just based on today's postings he's  
> willing to imprison and kill others based on his perceptions of  
> their religion. He's supporting collective punishment based on  
> gender, and opposes the existence of some states because of what he  
> describes as their treatment of people of a gender.
>
> What to make of this?
>
> Sunil
>
> From: philosopher.joe at gmail.com
> To: donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.com
> Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 17:56:27 -0700
> CC: vision2020 at moscow.com
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Government and babies
>
> Donovan,
>
> Your recent posts seem more like they are coming from a team! Tell  
> me, was the UR-86t joke your own, or what? Be honest!
>
> Joe Campbell
>
> On Apr 1, 2009, at 4:43 PM, Donovan Arnold <donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.com 
> > wrote:
>
> Jennifer writes:
>
> "Hmm, interesting idea. But, does this mean that we can also  
> retrospectively rescind the result when things go horribly, horribly  
> awry?"
>
> Yes, we should create a retroactive abortion pill, a pill where we  
> can send children back that are born to unfit or unresponsible  
> parents. We can call it the UR-86T-B4 Birth Pill.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Donovan
>
>
> --- On Wed, 4/1/09, Jennifer Ingalls <jennifer at inlandradio.com> wrote:
>
> From: Jennifer Ingalls <jennifer at inlandradio.com>
> Subject: [Vision2020] Government and babies
> To: "'vision2020'" <vision2020 at moscow.com>
> Date: Wednesday, April 1, 2009, 9:23 AM
>
> (Oops—I think not all my post transmitted before)
>
>
>
> Donovan writes: I think everyone should have to get government  
> approval to have a baby. :P
>
>
>
>
>
> Hmm, interesting idea. But, does this mean that we can also  
> retrospectively rescind the result when things go horribly, horribly  
> awry? I mean . . . VOTE to rescind in a entirely democratic (or  
> representative republicy) sort of way . . . you know if the result  
> does things we don’t really dig collectively as a society (or as a s 
> mall internet chat site)?
>
>
>
> Jennifer L. Ingalls
>
> Inland Northwest Broadcasting
>
> PO Box 8849
>
> Moscow, Idaho 83843
>
>
>
> Office: 208.882.2551
>
> Fax: 208.883.3571
>
> Cell: 208.669.1713
>
>
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>
> =======================================================
> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>                http://www.fsr.net
>           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================
>
> =======================================================
> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>               http://www.fsr.net
>          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================
> =======================================================
> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>               http://www.fsr.net
>          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20090401/72169375/attachment.html