[Vision2020] The Odd Lies Of Sarah Palin, XIX: "Fear" Of Wooten

Saundra Lund sslund_2007 at verizon.net
Mon Oct 20 13:54:35 PDT 2008


The Atlantic

The Daily Dish

Andrew Sullivan

19 Oct 2008 10:58 pm

 

The Odd Lies Of Sarah Palin, XIX: "Fear" Of Wooten

 

Last for now, but
<http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/12/us/politics/12trooper.html?_r=1&ref=polit
ics&oref=slogin>  not least. Here are some of the ways in which Todd and
Sarah Palin described their alleged "fear" of former brother-in-law state
trooper, Michael Wooten:

One of the paramount reasons that Gov. Sarah Palin and her husband have
given for voicing their concerns to Alaska public safety officials about
Trooper Michael Wooten, her former brother-in-law, is that they and their
relatives live in fear of him.

 

They have complained that Trooper Wooten made threats of violence against
the family, used a Taser on his 10-year-old stepson and has generally
struggled to control his anger... Mr. Palin said in his written statement to
Mr. Branchflower, "I make no apologies for wanting to protect my family and
wanting to publicize the injustice of a violent trooper keeping his badge."

 

All of this was the usual Palin bullshit:

An independent investigator for the State Legislature, who has concluded
that Ms. Palin abused the powers of her office by pressuring subordinates to
dismiss the trooper, contends that the claims of fear were a facade to mask
a maneuver in a family dispute.

 

In a report released Friday, the investigator, Stephen E. Branchflower, said
evidence, like the governor's decision to reduce the manpower of her
security detail, showed that "such claims of fear were not bona fide and
were offered to provide cover for the Palins' real motivation: to get
Trooper Wooten fired for personal family related reasons."

Mr. Branchflower described what he considered another inconsistency: If
Trooper Wooten was inclined to harm any of the Palins, then having him
terminated could lead to an act of retaliation. Forcing him out of his job,
the report stated, "would not have de-escalated the situation or provided"
Ms. Palin or her family with "greater security."

 

If you genuinely fear for your family's physical safety from a disgruntled
employee, does it really make sense to get him fired in a personal vendetta?

 

http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/10/the-odd-lies--5
.html

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20081020/bd3c764d/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the Vision2020 mailing list