[Vision2020] Just an Observation

[No Weatherman]

I've seen my share of conspiracy theories but this one takes the cake.

Ms. Mix, please search the archives and show this forum one post that
I have written that resembles the description below and show this
forum the post (or posts) that it responded to.

Feel free to post all of your private correspondence to me as well.



On 10/14/08, keely emerinemix <kjajmix1 at msn.com> wrote:
>
>  Visionaires,
>
> It's interesting to me that every time the noxious and bellicose No
> Weatherman posts on Moscow's Vision 2020, he posts a lot -- sometimes a
> dozen or more a day -- and Doug Wilson's Blog and Mablog remains fairly
> static. On the other hand, when Wilson is pounding away at B and M with his
> peculiar brand of acerbic wit and dubious theology, No Weatherman's posts to
> Vision 2020 virtually come to a halt.
>
> Please, Lord, let it just be a coincidence.
>
> No Weatherman posted Sunday 'til a few minutes before Christ Church's 10:30
> a.m. worship service, and that N. W. could be a local church congregant is
> disheartening, given the amount of time it takes to shed the vitriol and
> hatefulness that anonymity on a public email forum affords someone before
> attending a church service. (One wonders how conscience allowed him to take
> communion). Wilson, who says an Obama victory would leave him "appalled,"
> knows that the conventional wisdom is that he or his pals are No Weatherman
> -- there's some history there, lamentably -- but I sincerely hope that the
> ineffably rude N.W. is not at all connected to Christ Church and its
> ministries. Mr. Wilson, are you posting on Vision using a pseudonym? Are
> your elders, NSA instructors, or other associates? Or could someone
> gleefully be taking advantage of the conventional wisdom -- "it must be from
> Anselm House" -- to hide behind you?
>
> The thing is, we don't know. Now, if I were thought to be an anonymous,
> rude, incendiary participant on a community forum, I'd want everyone to know
> it ain't me -- because it wouldn't be. No Weatherman has refused to identify
> himself, and by using a pseudonym, he's confirmed that integrity is as low
> on his list of virtues as charity and civility. His cowardly anonymity is
> pathetic; if the pseudonym is employed to allow any public person, religious
> or not, to bloviate in the rudest, most inflammatory manner possible, its
> use is especially egregious. So here's some advice, which, along with this
> entire post, I'll put on Vision 2020:
>
> Drop the combativeness, clean up the rhetoric, and you'll find a pseudonym
> to be entirely unnecessary. If you're a pastor or elder, perhaps the need to
> cloak snottiness in anonymity might finally strike you as inconsistent with
> ministry. If you're not, it's time to seek out counsel from someone wiser
> than you.
>
> Heck, I'm just a girl, but you could even call me. By name.
>
> Keely
> http://keely-prevailingwinds.blogspot.com/
>
> ________________________________
> See how Windows Mobile brings your life together—at home, work, or on the
> go. See Now
> =======================================================
>   List services made available by First Step Internet,
>   serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>                http://www.fsr.net
>           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>  =======================================================
>