[Vision2020] responding to No Weatherman

[keely emerinemix]

Thank you, Bill, not only for your words below but for the integrity with which you live your life and the kindness that accompanies it.

Keely
http://keely-prevailingwinds.blogspot.com/


From: london at moscow.com
To: vision2020 at mail-gw.fsr.net
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 11:24:14 -0700
Subject: [Vision2020] responding to No Weatherman










No 
Weatherman:
Until today, I have not responded to your posts for several 
reasons:
1. you do not have the integrity to sign your opinions
2. you 
stretch and mangle the truth to suit your perspectives
3. your tone and 
message is strident, mean-spirited, angry, and offensive

However, I am 
going to respond this one time -- just to gloat.
The joke, you see, is all on 
you.  The more you sputter and bellow, the 
worse it gets for 
you.
The national numbers clearly show this is happening in all parts of this 

country -- Americans are finally awakening to the reality of your kind of 

divisive rhetoric.
The more the Republican spin-meisters try to compare a 
single sixty-year old 
professor of education with a horde of bomb-throwing 
Islamic warriors the 
worse it gets for the Republicans.  More and more 
voters are turned off by 
what they (correctly) perceive as the  
desperation of the Republican 
true-believers.
One reason is that 
Americans are getting tired of this empty anger, and 
another reason is that 
Obama has been masterful at reframing the issue.

So, continue if you 
wish, I'll be laughing as you dig your hole deeper.
BL



----- 
Original Message ----- 
From: "No Weatherman" <no.weatherman at gmail.com>
To: <vision2020 at moscow.com>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 1:50 
PM
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Election Fraud


> 
Chas:
>
> Dave absolutely made an argument and he premised it on the 
law — "they
> have to turn in fraudulent ballots, it's the 
law!"
>
> However, his premise neglected to consider that tiny 
little fact that
> ACORN broke the law when they committed felonies by 
knowingly
> registering dead people to vote with the intent to turn in 
those
> fraudulent registrations because according to them the law 
requires
> them to.
>
> You can't have it both 
ways.
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Chasuk 
<chasuk at gmail.com> 
wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 10:19, No Weatherman <no.weatherman at gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> You're arguing that 
once ACORN commits fraud by registering dead
>>> voters, they have a 
legal obligation to submit those fraudulent
>>> registrations to the 
state.
>>
>> Dave wasn't arguing anything.  He was 
stating a matter of law, which
>> you didn't refute, but twisted into 
an "argument," solely for the
>> purpose of making an ad hominem 
accusation.
>>
>
> 
=======================================================
> List services 
made available by First Step Internet,
> serving the communities of the 
Palouse since 
1994.
>               
http://www.fsr.net
>          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> 
=======================================================
>
> 



_________________________________________________________________
See how Windows Mobile brings your life together—at home, work, or on the go.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/msnnkwxp1020093182mrt/direct/01/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20081014/abaa05a1/attachment.html