[Vision2020] Everyone should understand that.

[No Weatherman]

Andreas,

Thanks for the reply, but I'm still struggling with the terrorism =
vandalism equivocation of yours, as well as "the slenderest of
threads," that led you to call me "disingenuous." Someone's being
disingenuous.

Ms. Mix,

Thanks for your spirited reply as well, to which I would only add,
Everyone should understand that."

However, given your rapid-fire response to this question, I will
assume that you have conceded the point of my request to "show me one
post that qualifies as 'objectionable stuff' in your book."

I'm beginning to see a pattern in this forum. You answer when you have
an answer and you ignore it and call names when you don't.

Is this correct?




On 10/4/08, Andreas Schou <ophite at gmail.com> wrote:
> Incidentally, Chris, Article 1 of the Constitution does define the
>  role of the Vice President as it relates to the legislative branch.
>  This wouldn't be salient to the conversation except that it's this
>  very argument that Cheney used to claim that the VP isn't subject to
>  restrictions on the executive branch.
>
>  -- ACS
>
>
>  On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 10:01 AM, No Weatherman <no.weatherman at gmail.com> wrote:
>  > During the VP debate, Ifill asked Senator Joseph Biden, "Vice
>  > President Cheney's interpretation of the vice presidency?"
>  >
>  > Biden answered, "Vice President Cheney has been the most dangerous
>  > vice president we've had probably in American history. The idea he
>  > doesn't realize that Article I of the Constitution defines the role of
>  > the vice president of the United States, that's the Executive Branch.
>  > He works in the Executive Branch. He should understand that. Everyone
>  > should understand that. . . ."
>  >
>  > Article 1 of the Constitution does not, in fact, define the role of
>  > the executive branch. It defines the role of the legislative branch,
>  > otherwise known as the branch in which Joe Biden has served for the
>  > last 36 years:
>  >
>  > http://www.usconstitution.net/xconst_A1Sec1.html
>  >
>  > http://www.johnmccain.com/McCainReport/Read.aspx?guid=8714477a-40fd-4b45-85fa-adaa2ee94fd2
>  >
>  > If Sarah Palin had gaffed as bad as smokin' Joe on such an important
>  > issue, what would the Obama supporters on the list have said?
>  >
>  > Everyone should understand that.
>  >
>
> > =======================================================
>  >  List services made available by First Step Internet,
>  >  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>  >               http://www.fsr.net
>  >          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>  > =======================================================
>  >
>