[Vision2020] Gitmo

[Andreas Schou]

Donovan --

9/11 was a crime on a tremendous scale, but it was not an "invasion."
An invasion involves enemy troops on American soil.

-- ACS

On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 8:24 PM, Donovan Arnold
<donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Chas,
>
>
>
> "An invasion and an attack are different things, and Tom specified an
> invasion."
>
>
>
> True, but the clause he quoted stated attack or invasion. I think the
> meaning of the clause is clear except to lawyers that like to argue and win
> impossible positions to advance their career.
>
>
>
> I agree we should have attacked Saudi Arabia, along with Afghanistan, and
> left Iraq contained as it was.
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
>
>
> Donovan
>
> --- On Wed, 6/18/08, Chasuk <chasuk at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Chasuk <chasuk at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Gitmo
> To: donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.com
> Cc: "Tom Hansen" <thansen at moscow.com>, "Andreas Schou" <ophite at gmail.com>,
> vision2020 at moscow.com, "Tom Hansen" <idahotom at hotmail.com>
> Date: Wednesday, June 18, 2008, 7:44 PM
>
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 19:26, Donovan Arnold
> <donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> What did you call 9/11? A welcoming party?
>
>> Sorry, but if the killing of 3,000 innocent Americans, and attacks and
>> attempted attacks on the the Pentagon, the White House, the Capitol, and
> the
>> World Trade Center, is not an attack, please define to what you would
>> consider an attack?
>
> An invasion and an attack are different things, and Tom specified an
> invasion.  We have not been invaded by a foreign power, we have been
> attacked by terrorists.  Based on the nationality and the financing of
> the attack, our own terrorist response should have been against Saudi
> Arabia, not Iraq.
>
> Chas
>