[Vision2020] Respect Vision 2020 Posters by having conversations only you want to engage in?

[Donovan Arnold]

Seems like an odd request.  Sorry I lost my copy of the list of every approved topic 98% of the people on Vision 2020 want to engage in. So, I am simply going to request you click the delete button if you don't want to read or participate in the discussion. 
 
 
Best Regards,
 
Donovan

--- On Mon, 6/16/08, B. J. Swanson <bjswan at moscow.com> wrote:

From: B. J. Swanson <bjswan at moscow.com>
Subject: Respect Vision 2020 as a COMMUNITY Listserve
To: "'Warren Hayman'" <whayman at roadrunner.com>, "'Chasuk'" <chasuk at gmail.com>, donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.com
Cc: vision2020 at moscow.com
Date: Monday, June 16, 2008, 7:36 AM

Warren,

I'm not offended and couldn't agree more. Thank you for saying it.
I'm sure
98% of the other Vision 2020 lurkers agree with you. 

Can we all be courteous and limit posts to 3 per day?  This would certainly
alleviate the ad nauseum posting about GITMO, Interfaith, Mexican Consulate,
Everyone Deserves Death and on and on....  Can we treat Vision 2020 as a
"Community" listserve and not as a personal blog for just a few.  If
you
want to continue these unwinnable arguments, how about taking them off
Vision 2020?

B. J. Swanson

--------------  

-----Original Message-----
From: vision2020-bounces at moscow.com [mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com]
On Behalf Of Warren Hayman
Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 9:48 PM
To: Chasuk; donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.com
Cc: vision2020 at moscow.com
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] [Bulk] Re: GITMO Detainees Can Challenge Detention

Hello All,

Am I the only one wondering how much of this discussion could occur 
off-list?

Sorry to any offended by the question,

Warren Hayman


      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20080616/29ba9cd4/attachment.html