[Vision2020] Energy saving lightbulbs... a different take

[Andy Boyd]

I did not mean to insult the Kai but the congressman, sorry if that came 
across wrong.
Since a majority of the country's electricity is produced by coal, that 
emits mercury into the atmosphere, the energy saving cfl ultimately uses 
less mercury than an incandescent.
The puported agenda is use more coal and incandescents that will lead to 
more mercury in the environment.

Andy Boyd
Manager/Education Coordinator
Moscow Recycling
208 882 0590
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Chasuk" <chasuk at gmail.com>
To: "Andy Boyd" <moscowrecycling at turbonet.com>
Cc: "Kai Eiselein, Editor" <editor at lataheagle.com>; <vision2020 at moscow.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 12:21 PM
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Energy saving lightbulbs... a different take


> Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 12:16, Andy Boyd <moscowrecycling at turbonet.com> wrote:
>
>> As usual, you only get half the story from a congressman who has his own
>> agenda to support.
>
> If you are going to refute (especially when you come across as mildly
> insulting: "as usual..."), refute.  Substantiate your "half the story"
> claim.  Describe this purported agenda.
>
> I'm not necessarily doubting you, but why tantalize?
>
> Chas
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.4.7/1542 - Release Date: 7/9/2008 
> 6:50 AM
>
>