[Vision2020] Vision2020 Digest, Vol 19, Issue 196

Tue Jan 29 12:14:47 PST 2008

And Another example of Bushanomics:

Bush Plans to Slash Veterans Benefits
Intervention Magazine | June 1 2004
A leaked White House memo shows that if George Bush is re-elected, he will make large cuts in many government programs, including both homeland security and veterans programs, while again cutting the taxes of the wealthy. 
Referring to America’s war dead, President Bush told an audience at Arlington National Cemetery on Memorial Day that “America acknowledges a debt that is beyond our power to repay.” Many of the nation’s 26 million living veterans, some of whom were wounded in wars, some of whom are old and frail, are wondering if President Bush is interested in repaying the debt owed to them. Veterans, as well as other Americans, are asking, where is George Bush's “compassionate conservatism”? 
A memorandum from the White House Budget Office, recently obtained by the Associated Press from congressional sources who requested anonymity, instructs government agencies to prepare for massive cuts to domestic programs in 2006, even as the administration pushes for $1 trillion in new tax cuts. 
“The ball is now out for everyone to see,” said Senator Bob Graham (Democrat--Florida). “The only thing that's left in place is the part of the ball that is labeled ‘tax cuts for my rich friends.’”
“The fat cats will get their tax cuts,” writes Bob Herbert in The New York Times. “But in the new American plutocracy, there won't even be crumbs left over for the working folks at the bottom of the pyramid to scramble after.”
“Same old Republican game,” says disabled Vietnam veteran Phil Hartman. “Raise the defense budget and make military veterans pay for the cost. Ronald Reagan did the same thing. George Bush is now doing it.”
Post-Election Budget
As revealed in the White House memo, with the exception of the Defense Department which would grow 5.2 percent to $422.7 billion and the Justice Department which would increase 4.3 percent to $19.5 billion, in the 2006 budget nearly every major domestic program would be slated for large decreases. 
The Veterans Affairs Department budget would fall 3.4 percent from $29.7 billion in 2005 to $28.7 billion. This would include a $910 million cut to the existing veterans health care budget and a $53 million cut for the homeownership program, nearly reversing the $78 million funding increase that Bush pledged for a homeownership program in 2005. 
For the last four years, the Bush Administration has been encouraging congressional Republicans to reduce veterans’ benefits and health care; most of the time they backed down in the face of strong Democratic opposition. Now the administration seems to have switched tactics: give today to take away even more tomorrow. The 2006 budget appears to be only the beginning of the administration’s drive to decrease the veterans’ budget. 
Presidential candidate John Kerry has strongly criticized the Bush Administration for not honoring “the national obligation” to our military veterans and promises that if he is elected there will be “a new compact with veterans” that includes fully funding the Veterans Administration.
Last year the head of the Veterans of Foreign Wars called a similar Bush Administration budget “disgraceful” and “deplorable.” In the coming years, if Bush is relected, we can expect the VFW to use words like “even more disgraceful” and “even more deplorable.” 
Even money for domestic security at the Homeland Security Department and other agencies, a budget John Kerry has promised to increase, a budget that would seem to be immune from any cuts, would drop by 3 percent, from $30.6 billion in 2005 to $29.6 billion. As CBS’s 60 Minutes pointed out last week, the large corporations have gotten their money for domestic security, only the States have not been paid. Time to cut the budget!
The document reveals that the Bush Administration is also ordering cuts in the following agencies: 2.4 percent less for the Education Department; 2.6 percent less for the Environmental Protection Agency; 2.1 percent for the National Institutes of Health; 1.9 percent less for the Interior Department. 
Meanwhile, the Administration is requesting a $1 trillion reduction in taxes, with most of the reduction going to the wealthiest Americans. 
“The only way we can even begin to pay for these huge tax cuts is by imposing cuts on critical government services,” said Thomas Kahn, Democratic staff director of the House Budget Committee. “Despite [administration] denials, this memorandum confirms what we suspected all along,” Kahn said. “Next February, the administration plans to propose spending cuts in key government services to pay for oversized tax cuts.”
“Many of the targeted programs are widely popular,” writes Alan Fram of the Associated Press. “Cuts could carry a political price for a president who has touted his support for schools, the environment and other domestic initiatives.”
This revelation of the Bush Administration’s plans to cut back on popular federal programs, programs that on the campaign trail George Bush is now supporting, is not only a political embarrassment, but a serious attack on the president's personal credibility. Plans to slash programs such as Head Start for children, homeownership, job-training, medical research and science programs, as well as homeland security and veterans programs, should come at a heavy political cost to a president whose standing in the polls continues to decline. The political cost should be his defeat in November.> > 1. Re: How Could Anyone Support That Woman? (Tom Hansen)> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------> > Message: 1> Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:52:24 -0800> From: Tom Hansen <idahotom at hotmail.com>> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] How Could Anyone Support That Woman?> To: lfalen <lfalen at turbonet.com>, Sunil Ramalingam> <sunilramalingam at hotmail.com>, <vision2020 at moscow.com>> Message-ID: <BAY134-W19720A338BC5D244889D2BD2350 at phx.gbl>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"> > Roger Falen stated:> > "There has not been any other 9/11 types of attacks on us. There has been several attempts, but they have thwarted."> > In a very, VERY minor way it is comforting to know that nobody has launched an attack on US soil since September 11, 2001 (6 years, 4 months, and 18 days ago).> > Yet another way to look at 9/11/2001 is that it was the first attack on US soil since December 7, 1941 (59 years, 9 months, 4 days prior to 9/11). > > Roger goes on to suggest that tax cuts will stimulate the economy. > > Note to Roger: This is the first war in our history where the president is pushing for tax cuts. "Tax cuts during war" is oxy-moronic. You say that we should provide for our troops (I am with you there 100%), then you go on to say:> > "Tax cuts would stimulate the economy and the increase in total income will more than make up for revenue that is lost by a tax cut."> > Question, Roger: How are tax cuts going to "give them all the support we can in the field and continue to take care of the veterans when they come home"?> > Tom Hansen> Moscow, Idaho> -------------- next part --------------> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...> URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20080129/9a700cbc/attachment-0001.html > > ------------------------------> > =======================================================> List services made available by First Step Internet, > serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994. > http://www.fsr.net > mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com> =======================================================> > End of Vision2020 Digest, Vol 19, Issue 196> *******************************************
_________________________________________________________________
Connect and share in new ways with Windows Live.
http://www.windowslive.com/share.html?ocid=TXT_TAGHM_Wave2_sharelife_012008
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20080129/c479195e/attachment-0001.html 