[Vision2020] Question: Hawkins Water Deal,

[pkraut at moscow.com]

I suspect the city should give it up!


> Tom et. al.
> 
> Thanks for the legal information impacting Moscow's water deal with out 
of
> state private developer Hawkins.  Legal language can easily be
> misinterpreted by a layman, but my reading leads me to think there may 
be
> legal problems with Moscow selling water to out of state Hawkins... I 
wonder
> if the legal eagles on Vision2020 might enlighten us ordinary mortals 
are to
> the correct interpretation of the Idaho water law involved in this 
opinion?
> It would be rather incredible for the Moscow City Council to rule 
against
> what they have insisted was a well considered water deal with Hawkins,
> claimed to be in the best interests of the city, unless under serious
> pressure to do so.  However, there are plenty of crows on the Palouse to
> eat...
> 
> As to the Moscow Health Insurance policy for domestic partnerships, if 
the U
> of I caved under the legal pressure regarding Idaho's Super DOMA, to 
avoid a
> lawsuit, I suspect the Moscow City Council may do the same.
> 
> Ted Moffett
> 
> 
> On 2/27/08, Tom Hansen <thansen at moscow.com> wrote:
> >
> > Greetings Visionaires -
> >
> > I have a question that I feel must be answered . . .
> >
> > Which opnion, submitted by the State Attorney General's Office, will 
the
> > city of Moscow enforce?
> 
> 
> http://www.MoscowCares.com/SAG_Opinions.htm
> 
> Seeya round town, Moscow.
> 
> Tom Hansen
> Moscow, Idaho
> 
> 
> "People who ridicule others while hiding behind anonymous monikers in 
chat-
> room forums are neither brave nor clever."
> 
> - Latah County Sheriff Wayne Rausch (August 21,
> 2007)
> 




---------------------------------------------
This message was sent by First Step Internet.
           http://www.fsr.com/