[Vision2020] (no subject)

Sue Hovey suehovey at moscow.com
Thu Feb 14 13:14:31 PST 2008


Well e involves competition with other public bodies and f involves imminant litigation, so how do those fit?  Certainly none of the other options do, but even so, looks like a stretch to me.

Sue H


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Jeff Harkins 
  To: vision2020 at moscow.com 
  Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 7:13 PM
  Subject: [Vision2020] (no subject)


    To those interested, it would appear that items e and f of the state statute for executive sessions would be applicable.



    (e)  To consider preliminary negotiations involving matters of 


    trade or commerce in which the governing body is in competition with 


    governing bodies in other states or nations;


    (f)  To communicate with legal counsel for the public agency to 


    discuss the legal ramifications of and legal options for pending 


    litigation, or controversies not yet being litigated but imminently likely to be


    litigated. The mere presence of legal counsel at an executive 


    session does not satisfy this requirement;




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  =======================================================
   List services made available by First Step Internet, 
   serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.   
                 http://www.fsr.net                       
            mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
  =======================================================
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20080214/8cdfb4ce/attachment.html 


More information about the Vision2020 mailing list