[Vision2020] (no subject)
Sue Hovey
suehovey at moscow.com
Thu Feb 14 13:14:31 PST 2008
Well e involves competition with other public bodies and f involves imminant litigation, so how do those fit? Certainly none of the other options do, but even so, looks like a stretch to me.
Sue H
----- Original Message -----
From: Jeff Harkins
To: vision2020 at moscow.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 7:13 PM
Subject: [Vision2020] (no subject)
To those interested, it would appear that items e and f of the state statute for executive sessions would be applicable.
(e) To consider preliminary negotiations involving matters of
trade or commerce in which the governing body is in competition with
governing bodies in other states or nations;
(f) To communicate with legal counsel for the public agency to
discuss the legal ramifications of and legal options for pending
litigation, or controversies not yet being litigated but imminently likely to be
litigated. The mere presence of legal counsel at an executive
session does not satisfy this requirement;
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
=======================================================
List services made available by First Step Internet,
serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
http://www.fsr.net
mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
=======================================================
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20080214/8cdfb4ce/attachment.html
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list