[Vision2020] (no subject)

J Ford privatejf32 at hotmail.com
Thu Feb 14 07:13:23 PST 2008


Yes, but WERE we in competition?  Sounds like, to me, the only thing negotiated was the water/sewer use and nothing else.  Don't see how that is competition with Washington especially if they weren't even involved in the talks.

Clarification would be nice.

J  :]


Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:13:09 -0800
To: vision2020 at moscow.com
From: jeffh at moscow.com
Subject: [Vision2020] (no subject)





To those interested, it would appear that items e and f of the state
statute for executive sessions would be applicable.





(e)  To consider
preliminary negotiations involving matters of 



trade or commerce in which the governing body is in competition with




governing bodies in other states or nations;



(f)  To communicate with legal counsel for the public agency to




discuss the legal ramifications of and legal options for pending




litigation, or controversies not yet being litigated but imminently
likely to be



litigated. The mere presence of legal counsel at an executive




session does not satisfy this requirement;






_________________________________________________________________
Climb to the top of the charts! Play the word scramble challenge with star power.
http://club.live.com/star_shuffle.aspx?icid=starshuffle_wlmailtextlink_jan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20080214/dd8c8306/attachment.html 


More information about the Vision2020 mailing list