[Vision2020] Water and Sewer Agreements: second reply from Walter Steed

[Ted Moffett]

All-

I am inclined to think Garrett should not have posted Steed's private
response after Mr. Steed wrote:

I purposefully deleted V2020
because, as a policy, I do not respond to it.  I try
to respond promptly at all e-mails sent directly to me
by individuals (please do not incite V2020 to start
sending everything to me as I will have to stop all
responses).
-------------
This indicates clearly that Mr. Steed knew Garrett might post his response
to the list, and asked him not to.  But I disagree with Mr. Steeds decision,
and the obvious avoidance of Vision2020 by many public officials, to refuse
to engage in dialog on Vision2020.

Ted Moffett



On Feb 11, 2008 5:20 PM, Chasuk <chasuk at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Feb 11, 2008 5:05 PM, Craine Kit <kcraine at verizon.net> wrote:
>
> > Flame me if you want, but as far as I'm concerned posting private
> > emails on any public list is no different than secretly recording a
> > private conversation then broadcasting it on the radio. It may be
> > legal, but it is not right. Ethics is proper behavior without
> > government interference.
>
> You are right, of course, except that Mr. Steed's words seem to
> indicate that he is at least aware of Garrett's actions (i.e., he
> seems aware that Garrett is publicly posting their private
> correspondence).  That, and this is a public servant writing about a
> public matter, with nothing pesonal divulged, which does, on
> reflection, make me a bit ambivalent.
>
> Chas
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20080212/d9e033ae/attachment.html