[Vision2020] child forced back/was Romney drops out!?
Tom Hansen
thansen at moscow.com
Sat Feb 9 11:54:10 PST 2008
Perhaps this will refresh some memories.
I realize that many of you are eager to cast the blame on Bill (he),
Hillary (she), or Billary (both) Clinton. But the truth of the matter is
that it was a matter of child custody.
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0004/07/bn.05.html
Tom Hansen
Moscow, Idaho
>
> I know I'm sidetracking...
>
> I agree that returning a child to his father may have caused political
prob> lems for Gore had he accepted help from Bill Clinton in 2000. But I
do
dis> agree that 'they forced that Cuban child back to Castro.'
>
> They returned a child to his father after his mother's death. A child
shou> ld be with his or her natural parents unless there's a showing that
the
par> ents are unfit. There was no such showing in the Gonzalez case.
Instead
w> e had politics sticking its ugly head into family business, just as we
late> r saw in the Terry Schiavo case.
>
> Extended family, wherever they're located, don't get to grab someone
else's> child unless the parent/s are unfit. We wouldn't allow the
Beverly Hills
> relatives to grab a Moscow/Potlatch/Deary child from a parent just
because
> the relatives had a big house with a cement pond.
>
> Sunil
>
> Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 19:04:17 -0800
> From: donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.com
> To: sdredge at yahoo.com; vision2020 at moscow.com
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Romney drops out!?
>
> Scott, In 2000 Bill Clinton had a 42% approval rating. Campaigning
with> Clinton in 2000 would have been a kiss of death. He had an even
lower
rati> ng in Florida because they forced that Cuban child back to
Castro.
Yes> , Gore lost the election because Florida's Secretary of State,
Kathleen
Har> ris, certified the wrong set of popular votes giving the electoral
votes
to> Bush instead of Gore. Also, Nader split the Democratic vote in
Vermont,
gi> ving the state to Bush. Gore didn't lose the election in 2000, it was
stole> n from him, and Nader made it possible. Nader doesn't have issues
he is
con> cerned with, he is only concerned about himself. The environment has
been
d> emolished and set back decades because Bush was allowed into
office.
B> est Regards, Donovan
>
> Scott Dredge <sdredge at yahoo.com> wrote: It's a stretch to
suggest
> that Nader sabotaged the 2000 election. The reason Al Gore lost was
becaus> e of Al Gore himself. Under the categories of coulda, woulda,
shoulda,
Go> re coulda had Bill Clinton campaigning for him instead of distancing
himsel> f from Clinton. And Bill Clinton knows how to run a successful
campaign.
>
> I'd like to see a Clinton/Obama ticket running against a McCain/anybody
tic> ket. Also, it doesn't particularly matter much to me which ticket
wins,
I'> m just looking forward to the regime change even though George W. Bush
is
b> asically neutered at this stage.
>
> -Scott
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Ted Moffett <starbliss at gmail.com>
> To: Garrett Clevenger <garrettmc at verizon.net>
> Cc: vision2020 at moscow.com
> Sent: Friday, February 8, 2008 1:36:56 PM
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Romney drops out!?
>
> On 2/8/08, Garrett Clevenger <garrettmc at verizon.net> wrote: Edwards
w> ould be good, as I like what he says, but my
> preference would be Ralph Nader, who may very well
> campaign for President. Appealing to Progressives is
> good with me, despite whatever baggage Nader may have
> (and really, who
> doesn't have baggage?)
>
> Nader has a record of working on changing America for
> the better for 40 years. He is well connected to the
> activist community, and engaging activists is key to
> changing our country from it's disastrous course. An
> Obama/Nader ticket sounds sweet to me.
>
> gclev Many progressives begged Nader to drop out of the 2000
presidenti> al race, due to the potential of splitting the Democratic vote
harming
Gore> 's chances. We all know the result. Nader helped put Bush in the
White
Ho> use in 2000. Nader's Florida votes alone gave Florida's electoral
votes
to> Bush, as the vote count actually was counted, though we also know that
abs> ent illegal voter disenfranchisement, deliberately pushed by Florida's
Secr> etary of State and Bush supporter Katherine Harris, Gore would have
won
Flo> rida, even with Nader's participation. Republican
> operatives were running ads supporting Nader's 2000 candidacy, knowing
thi> s would hurt Gore. And Nader knew this. Nader even argued that a
Bush
> presidency might be good for the nation in the long run, given that Bush
wo> uld create such a back lash against his policies that progressives in
the
l> ong run would become more unified and motivated. But as far as I
am
c> oncerned, given the damage of the Bush administration, Nader's 2000
preside> ntial run was an irresponsible application of idealistic
principles over
se> nsible practical politics, resulting in wounds that may not heal for
decade> s. The pending US Supreme Court nominations in 2000 alone were
enough of
a> reason for Nader to withdraw to allow Gore the best chance of a win.
Nade> r and everyone knew there was zero chance of Nader taking the White
House.
> His presidential run did not even result in a stronger party base
supporti> ng Nader
> or those who support his policies. His supporters are more off the radar
n> ow than in 2000. I recall hearing from Nader supporters in 2000 how
Gor> e and Bush both represented corporate big money, and entrenched
elitist
Was> hington power, and were not that different. Well, we have seen that
howeve> r much this was true, there were substantial differences between
Gore and
B> ush that would have taken the USA in very different directions on
critical
> issues, the invasion of Iraq and climate change, for example. I do not
bel> ieve Gore would have supported the invasion and occupation of Iraq,
and he
> would have began to address climate change while the Bush administration
wa> s in denial, backing big oil and energy interests, who did not want to
addr> ess climate change for obvious financial reasons. Nader would be
a
terr> ible choice for a VP candidate under Obama. I lost respect for him
as a
po> litician after
> his sabotage of the 2000 presidential election. This showed he is not
wil> ling to compromise when the overall good of the nation is at
stake.
T> ed Moffett
>
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>
> =========================> =========================> =====
> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> http://www.fsr.net
> mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =========================> =========================> =====
> =========================> =========================> =====
> List services made available by First Step
> Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> http://www.fsr.net
> mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =========================> =========================> =====
>
>
>
>
> Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.
>
>
"People who ridicule others while hiding behind anonymous monikers in chat-
room forums are neither brave nor clever."
- Latah County Sheriff Wayne Rausch (August 21,
2007)
---------------------------------------------
This message was sent by First Step Internet.
http://www.fsr.com/
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list