[Vision2020] Shoes thrown at President Bush

Kai Eiselein, Editor editor at lataheagle.com
Thu Dec 18 15:50:41 PST 2008


Because the "terrorists, child molesters, and criminal scum" are entitled to 
competent counsel and a fair trial under the U.S. Constitution. That is why 
they are defended.
You know, that piece of parchment that the terrorists would love to tear up 
and forget about....


From: Donovan Arnold
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 3:41 PM
To: vision 2020 ; Sunil Ramalingam
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Shoes thrown at President Bush


Typical Sunil,

Find a statement, twist it's meaning. Then blow it up as being of the most 
importance.
Such as taking up my incorrect use of the word "foreigner" instead of "non 
US Citizen" to ignore the fact that the US President was attacked.

Second, Sunil, you ALWAYS take the side of the criminal, the attacker, the 
murder, the terrorist, or the child molester, and turn them into the 
helpless victim and US society as the TRUE criminal and true source of all 
things evil and wrong.

Third, you make up weak arguments your opponent never made. Ridicule it, and 
point to it being flawed. Example: "Our democracy is lost because of two 
shoes?  Ridiculous." Nobody said that, or believes that, and you know that.

Finally, you accuse everyone of launching personal attacks against you, 
while doing the same to others and to just as a degree. Such as, "You're not 
just full of crap, you're covered with it."

Sunil, you maybe be able to argue better then me. But that doesn't make you 
right. Your beliefs are harmful to people. Such as wanting to release all 
people from Gitmo, whom we know at least 12 were plotters of 9/11. Your work 
puts people who harm innocent people and children in harms way. I would 
rather be dead than be a lawyer for the killers, murderers, and rapists you 
aide.

You can argue well, no doubt. But what you argue is just wrong and evil, in 
my opinion, most the time. Why not use your superpowers to help the elderly, 
disabled, sick, and poor, rather then the terrorists, child molesters, and 
criminal scum you defend so fervently?

Best Regards,

Donovan




--- On Thu, 12/18/08, Sunil Ramalingam <sunilramalingam at hotmail.com> wrote:

From: Sunil Ramalingam <sunilramalingam at hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Shoes thrown at President Bush
To: donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.com, "vision 2020" <vision2020 at moscow.com>
Date: Thursday, December 18, 2008, 6:11 AM


Typical Donovan:

First make an incorrect statement, in this case calling an Iraqi a foreigner 
in his own country.

Then when this is pointed out, shift the subject, in this case the 
nonsensical sovereignty argument.  Our democracy is lost because of two 
shoes?  Ridiculous.

Third, when someone disagrees with this, launch personal attacks that are 
lies and nonsense.  You can't prove a single claim you make against me 
because you've made it all up.  You got nothing, Donovan, nothing but your 
loud empty-headed yelling.

You accuse me of supporting expediency?  BS.  You're the guy willing to 
ignore laws to hold 'accused terrorists' forever and you accuse me of being 
expedient?  BS.

You're not just full of crap, you're covered with it.

Sunil

> Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 20:50:58 -0800
> From: donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.com
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Shoes thrown at President Bush
> To: vision2020 at moscow.com; sunilramalingam at hotmail.com
>
> Sunil,
>
> I don't have to make stuff up, you provide plenty. You throw so many red 
> herrings there must be a Great Lake emptied of them.
>
> You move off the topic, and attack something so irrelevant to the issue in 
> hopes that nobody notices.
>
> You said, in no uncertain terms, you are not concerned about the 
> sovereignty of the United States. That was my point, you don't care. I do.
>
> Your primary argument to me is not about a people's right to elect leaders 
> without them being attacked or harassed.
>
> You appear to ALWAYS enjoy taking the side of the criminal over the 
> victim. In fact, I cannot think of a time when you have not.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Donovan
>
>
>
>
>
> --- On Tue, 12/16/08, Sunil Ramalingam <sunilramalingam at hotmail.com> 
> wrote:
>
> > From: Sunil Ramalingam <sunilramalingam at hotmail.com>
> > Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Shoes thrown at President Bush
> > To: "vision 2020" <vision2020 at moscow.com>
> > Date: Tuesday, December 16, 2008, 8:51 PM
> > You must have missed the part where I said I don't
> > support throwing shoes at Presidents. That would include
> > Bush. But go ahead and make stuff up; it's your strong
> > suit.
> >
> > I don't think this one incident will lead to Bush doing
> > an appreciably worse job.
> >
> > I look forward to your next discussion of what is - How did
> > you put it? - what is 'morally and ethically
> > important.'
> >
> > Sunil
> >
> > > Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 20:45:39 -0800
> > > From: donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.com
> > > Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Shoes thrown at President
> > Bush
> > > To: vision2020 at moscow.com; sunilramalingam at hotmail.com
> > >
> > > Sunil,
> > >
> > > The United States, as any nation's people, should
> > have the unalienable right to democratically elect its
> > leaders and representatives without them being assaulted or
> > harassed by the people of another country. What is the point
> > of a democracy if the elected leaders are just harassed,
> > assaulted, or killed while performing their duties?
> > >
> > > You always present yourself to me as someone that
> > ignores what is morally and ethically important for the sake
> > of whatever is expedient for your cause at the time.
> > >
> > > You hate Bush, and as far as I can tell, and most of
> > his policies, so you are shoving side a very basic and
> > important right of people for the justification of attacking
> > a man you dislike. No doubt your tune would change if it
> > were a more serious assault against a leader you liked.
> > >
> > > Best Regards,
> > >
> > > Donovan
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- On Tue, 12/16/08, Sunil Ramalingam
> > <sunilramalingam at hotmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > From: Sunil Ramalingam
> > <sunilramalingam at hotmail.com>
> > > > Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Shoes thrown at
> > President Bush
> > > > To: "vision 2020"
> > <vision2020 at moscow.com>
> > > > Date: Tuesday, December 16, 2008, 5:34 PM
> > > > Donovan,
> > > >
> > > > I don't give a rat's ass about this
> > guy's
> > > > citizenship; now that's a red herring. I can
> > see that
> > > > he wasn't attacked by a foreigner, since it
> > looks like
> > > > the guy was an Iraqi in his own country.
> > > >
> > > > I am perturbed that he was able to get the second
> > shoe off,
> > > > and I don't recommend people throw shoes at
> > presidents,
> > > > or most other people. I also don't think
> > they should be
> > > > killed for doing it.
> > > >
> > > > What I am least concerned about, and what I find
> > > > remarkable, is the notion that our sovereignty
> > was
> > > > threatened. When we start showing respect for
> > the
> > > > sovereignty of other states, I may come to see
> > our own
> > > > sovereignty has a delicate flower in need of
> > protection.
> > > > You can keep repeating your concern, and I'll
> > still find
> > > > it either meaningless or ludicrous. Important
> > issue my foot.
> > > > That guy wasn't making a statement about
> > sovereignty,
> > > > he was illustrating his view of Bush.
> > > >
> > > > Worrying that our sovereignty was somehow
> > threatened
> > > > strikes me like worrying about Rush
> > Limbaugh's ego
> > > > should he hear a criticism of his views.
> > > >
> > > > As far as tempting us, apparently they did that
> > by having
> > > > oil under their ground.
> > > >
> > > > Sunil
> > > >
> > > > Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:01:52 -0800
> > > > From: donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.com
> > > > To: vision2020 at moscow.com; tiedye at turbonet.com
> > > > Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Shoes thrown at
> > President Bush
> > > >
> > > > Dave and Sunil,
> > > >
> > > > What is clear is that you are not bothered by an
> > attempt to
> > > > assault the President of the United States by
> > someone that
> > > > is not a US Citizen.
> > > >
> > > > It doesn't matter if the US President is
> > assaulted by a
> > > > foreigner on his soil or ours. It is still an
> > attack on US
> > > > Sovereignty. That is the point. If you missed
> > that, I will
> > > > repeat it; It doesn't matter if the US
> > President is
> > > > assaulted by a foreigner on his soil or ours. Is
> > is still an
> > > > attack on US Sovereignty.
> > > >
> > > > I think focusing on the fact that the US base was
> > in Iraq,
> > > > is a big smelly red herring intentionally thrown
> > into to the
> > > > argument to avert away from the important issue
> > of US
> > > > security and sovereignty, which is what is being
> > challenged.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > And yes, Sunil, Middle Eastern nations do need to
> > be
> > > > careful about how they behave because the US has
> > no qualms
> > > > about blowing people up or invading nations. It
> > is idiotic
> > > > for a people to tempt and taunt those with the
> > biggest
> > > > weapons that are also willing to use them.
> > > >
> > > > Best Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Donovan
> > > >
> > > > --- On Tue, 12/16/08, Dave
> > <tiedye at turbonet.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > From: Dave <tiedye at turbonet.com>
> > > > Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Shoes thrown at
> > President Bush
> > > > To: "vision2020"
> > <vision2020 at moscow.com>
> > > > Date: Tuesday, December 16, 2008, 8:14 AM
> > > >
> > > > Donovan Arnold wrote:
> > > > > I meant, Sunil, that the guy who attacked
> > the US
> > > > President was not a US
> > > > Citizen. I guess you can play semantics if you
> > want, but I
> > > > think my meaning was
> > > > clear.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > Quite clear: you think that the USA owns the
> > world.
> > > >
> > > > Dave
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -- 
> > > > Windows, OSX, or Linux is the same choice as:
> > > > McDonalds, Burger King, or a (real) Co-Op.
> > > >
> > > >
> > =======================================================
> > > > List services made available by First Step
> > Internet,
> > > > serving the communities of the Palouse since
> > 1994.
> > > > http://www.fsr.net
> >
> > > > mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> > > >
> > =======================================================
> > > >
> > > >
> > =======================================================
> > > > List services made available by First Step
> > Internet,
> > > > serving the communities of the Palouse since
> > 1994.
> > > > http://www.fsr.net
> >
> > > > mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> > > >
> > =======================================================
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > =======================================================
> > List services made available by First Step Internet,
> > serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> > http://www.fsr.net
> > mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> > =======================================================
>
>
>

=======================================================
 List services made available by First Step Internet,
 serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
               http://www.fsr.net
          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
=======================================================






=======================================================
 List services made available by First Step Internet,
 serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
               http://www.fsr.net
          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
=======================================================
Kai Eiselein
Editor, Latah Eagle 



More information about the Vision2020 mailing list