[Vision2020] Noise Ordinance Amendment Update
Sunil Ramalingam
sunilramalingam at hotmail.com
Fri Oct 26 20:36:17 PDT 2007
Yeah, Garrett, if that's your real name, when did you stop defecating on
your neighbor's lawn, banging your head to Sabbath?
Sunil
>From: J Ford <privatejf32 at hotmail.com>
>To: Garrett Clevenger <garrettmc at verizon.net>, <vision2020 at moscow.com>
>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Noise Ordinance Amendment Update
>Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:38:18 -0700
>
>
>Mr, Clevenger -whomever you may be:
>
>You state:
>
>"Duke's analogy was police ticketing drivers if they break the law.
>Driving is not a guaranteed constitutional right. You need to get a
>drivers license in order to legally drive. There are set rules and
>speed limits you must follow and there is a potential for physically
>hurting or killing someone if you are reckless.
>
>Free
>speech and the right to assembly, on the other hand, are guaranteed by
>the First Amendment to our Constitution. This is a civil liberty that
>as Americans we should be proud of and defend against those who wish to
>limit it."
>
>My response:
>
>B U N K!
>
>Blasting your music at 3am, fighting on the streets at the same hour,
>ripping your car through neighborhoods at the same hour, peeing and
>defecating on neighbor's property, "partying" are NOT - that's NOT!!!!! -
>guaranteed rights. These "parties" and attendees are NOT practicing "free
>speech" (last I heard "Prince" and "Black Sabbath" do not live in Moscow)
>by blasting the so-called-music and waking everyone up in the area. Being
>at a "party" is not assembly; it is what it is - a PARTY! Those people are
>not gathered there for any political or social-affecting reason - they are
>there to get drunk, be loud, and they do a bang-up job of disturbing the
>entire area.
>
>It MAY be only 17% of the population that is doing this "partying" - but it
>affects a whole lot more than 17% of the population when they are this
>disruptive and unruly.
>
>
>
>J :]
>
>
>Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:32:11 -0700
>From: garrettmc at verizon.net
>To: vision2020 at moscow.com
>Subject: [Vision2020] Noise Ordinance Amendment Update
>
>I attended the administrative meeting last Monday to talk with some city
>council members, the city attorney and assistant chief of police David Duke
>about the proposal.
>
>The city council will be voting on this on November 5 at 7pm at city
>council chambers.
>
>The noise ordinance as amended will allow police officers to issue a
>citation on the spot to anyone anywhere in Moscow at anytime for making
>noise the officer deems offensive. There is no set noise limit. This
>potentially will lead to violation of our First Amendment rights.
>
>According to the police department, 17% of noise violations are repeat
>offenders (party houses), the supposed target of this amendment. It is
>offensive that this council will violate our First Amendment rights to
>target these 17%. Why should everybody in Moscow be subject to this
>draconian law?
>
>If they really wanted to target these 17%, the modification would expand
>the 48 hour time period between
> warnings to one month and be within the times of 10 pm to 7am. To me,
>that seems like the most logical and at least worth a try to see if it
>works, rather than changing the law so extremely. It will also reduce the
>likelihood of a lawsuit and penalty against the city if the court finds it
>unconstitutional.
>
>The proposal before the city council is not responsible legislation.
>
>It is also counter intuitive to building community through neighborly
>relations. To rely on the police to solve an issue that is best resolved
>through citizens rather than law enforcement will lead to the dissolution
>of community responsibility. The police should approach noisy people after
>neighbor complaints, rather than proactively seeking out these noisy
>people. That would be a waste of their time.
>
>Duke's analogy was police ticketing drivers if they break the law. Driving
>is not a guaranteed constitutional right. You need to get a
> drivers license in order to legally drive. There are set rules and speed
>limits you must follow and there is a potential for physically hurting or
>killing someone if you are reckless.
>
>Free speech and the right to assembly, on the other hand, are guaranteed by
>the First Amendment to our Constitution. This is a civil liberty that as
>Americans we should be proud of and defend against those who wish to limit
>it.
>
>They also argued that you can fight this charge in court. That is also
>bogus, because by that time you have already paid a penalty of time, hassle
>and potentially fees.
>
>This is a bad law and will potentially be abused. It also psychologically
>suppresses people's freedom of expression by fearing they will be ticketed
>for a misdemeanor, which is also an extreme charge and penalty (ranging
>from $159 to $359) for making a little bit of noise.
>
>This law, the way I see it, is another attempt to water down our rights.
> The Bush administration has seen fit to violate our 4th Amendment rights
>of unreasonable search and seizure through warrantless wiretaps, among
>other things.
>
>The city council needs to hear from you. Please take a moment to tell them
>to reject the amendment or to modify it to expand the time between warnings
>to one month, between the hours of 10 pm and 7 am (and complaints should be
>citizen driven, not police driven) rather than voting on it as is.
>
>Aaron Ament aaronament at moscow.com
>Bill Lambert blambert at ci.moscow.id.us
>Linda Pall lpall at moscow.com;
>John Weber jweber at moscow.com
>Tom Lamar tlamar at moscow.com
>Kit Crane kcraine at moscow.id.usMayor Nancy Chaney nchaney at ci.moscow.id.us
>
>Thank you,
>
>Garrett Clevenger
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Climb to the top of the charts! Play Star Shuffle: the word scramble
>challenge with star power.
>http://club.live.com/star_shuffle.aspx?icid=starshuffle_wlmailtextlink_oct
>=======================================================
> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> http://www.fsr.net
> mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>=======================================================
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list