[Vision2020] Coulter's Dream - from CNN
Tom Hansen
thansen at moscow.com
Tue Oct 16 16:11:10 PDT 2007
g stated:
"No, I was referring to Ms. Lund's post which almost perfectly mirrored Mr.
Campbell's response. (no collusion there, I'm sure) I don't know about Doug,
but my mother sorta thinks I'm special..."
You may be on to something, g. Rumor has it that Joe Campbell and Saundra
Lund went to different schools together.
Seeya round town, Moscow.
Tom Hansen
Moscow, Idaho
"I think if you are going to attack someone in public, you need to at least
be willing to meet with them in public in a debate or discussion format,
otherwise you will rightfully earn the term of a yellow-belly."
- Donovan Arnold (October 4, 2006)
_____
From: vision2020-bounces at moscow.com [mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com]
On Behalf Of g. crabtree
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 12:10 PM
To: J Ford; vision2020 at moscow.com
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Coulter's Dream - from CNN
No, I was referring to Ms. Lund's post which almost perfectly mirrored Mr.
Campbell's response. (no collusion there, I'm sure) I don't know about Doug,
but my mother sorta thinks I'm special...
g
----- Original Message -----
From: J Ford <mailto:privatejf32 at hotmail.com>
To: vision2020 at moscow.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 9:17 AM
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Coulter's Dream - from CNN
Gary says: " I am sorry to disappoint you and your ladies aid society..."
Is this supposed to be an insult? SUCH a kirker-like thing to do, Gary.
Dougie must be so very proud of you!
J :]
> From: jampot at roadrunner.com
> To: joekc at adelphia.net
> Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 07:52:20 -0700
> CC: vision2020 at moscow.com; donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.com
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Coulter's Dream - from CNN
>
> It's a doggone good thing you don't make your living as a gambling man,
Mr.
> Campbell. I am sorry to disappoint you and your ladies aid society but
> nothing in the post you reference was given to me by anyone else. It seems
> to me to be another example of your oversized ego to imagine that there is
a
> group devoted to making you look foolish when it's clear that you have the
> situation so well in hand.
>
> Of course, I have cross posted from the right mind site but I'm fairly
sure
> I have cited it each time. Dale (nor any flavor of Doug) has no
> responsibility for anything that I have written to you, ever. It would
seem
> that you and your associates ongoing obsession is spilling over into
> paranoia. And might I mention that the assertion coming from a conspiracy
> theorist who, along with her fellow "researcher," keeps shoe boxes of
files
> on their pet infatuation is an irony to amusing to ignore.
>
> Regarding the supposed error I made in the use of the phrase "embracing
> abortion," I'm sorry if I received the wrong impression from all the times
> you have trotted out your "clear harms to clear people" defense of the
> practice. I'd dive back into the archives and provide reference for why I
> may have reached the conclusion that I did but, it seems clear that being
> held accountable for what you say makes you testy. Today I'll refrain.
>
> This most recent rant on your part seems to center on the fact I made a
> statement concerning your "ambiguous religious disposition." You take
> exception and in defense state " I don't like to talk about the specifics
of
> my religious beliefs. I speak in vague generalities. The comments were
> vague..." When I go to Thesaurus.com the very first entry under "vague" is
> ambiguous. With this being the case, just exactly what is it that has you
> going off on yet another of your incoherent and all too frequent rants?
>
> In closing let me say that I find it quite odd and faintly disturbing that
> your concern over me is so all consuming that you would use it to
influence
> your voting decisions. Maybe you could read up and attend a candidates
forum
> or two? I'm fairly sure that my inconsequential blathering here on the V
> doesn't quite make the candidates radar screen.
>
> g
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Joe Campbell" <joekc at adelphia.net>
> To: "g. crabtree" <jampot at roadrunner.com>
> Cc: "Donovan Arnold" <donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.com>;
<vision2020 at moscow.com>
> Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 6:53 PM
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Coulter's Dream - from CNN
>
>
> Gary: "So when YOUR incongruous comments are pointed out, I'M a jackass."
>
> No. You can't blame your jackassedness on my incongruous comments.
>
> Gary: "I suppose no matter what happens in your life that's not quite to
> your liking it will
> be someone else that's at fault."
>
> No. I never said this. If you can point out where I said this I'd
appreciate
> it. You seem to
> have access to a lot of my quotes and lots of time on your hands.
>
> Gary: "I fail to see how supporting my contentions by providing reference
to
> your actual
> words equals making fun of your religious beliefs. By the way, I don't
> collect your
> quotes, the V2020 archive does. If you are embarrassed by what you have
said
> in the past
> I don't see how I can be held accountable. Providing the full quote and a
> reference to
> where it can be found is pretty much the exact opposite of quoting out of
> context."
>
> I stand by my words. You're MISSING THE POINT. The point is, you're a
> jackass and
> I'm not going to take the trouble to explain my views any further since
you
> don't really
> want to understand them. You want to ridicule them.
>
> Also, did you find the quotes, or did someone give them to you? I bet you
> won't answer
> this question! Have you ever published any information sent to you by a
> member of
> Christ Church who's first initial is 'D'?
>
> Gary: "I don't believe that pointing out inconsistency is the same as
> ridicule ."
>
> Of course it is not. But you didn't point out an inconsistency. You just
> strung together a
> bunch of quotes that Doug, or Dale, or Doug FED YOU and supposed that that
> would do
> the trick. But you don't even understand the quotes. Which is why you
can't
> spot an
> inconsistency. If I'm wrong, do it.
>
> As I said in recent posts, I don't like to talk about the specifics of my
> religious beliefs. I
> speak in vague generalities. The comments were vague - such is the nature
of
> my
> comments. I'd like to know why you think they are inconsistent - but you
can't
> say since
> this was not YOUR idea. Again, prove me wrong and explain the
inconsistency.
>
> Gary: ". so, here's a challenge for you. Using the same technique, why
don't
> you back
> up your assertion that I 'make fun of your religious beliefs.' Providing
> actual examples of
> my dastardly ways would doubtless go quite a bit further than your
> unsubstantiated whining."
>
> You claimed that I "embrace abortion" and this is a lie. Where have I said
> this? I've said
> the opposite on numerous occasions. But you persist in this lie because
you
> are a jackass.
>
> I am using you as a litmus test for the coming election. I will ask each
> candidate, "Do you
> think Gary Crabtree is a jackass"? If they say 'No,' I'm not voting for
> them.
>
>
>
> =======================================================
> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> http://www.fsr.net
> mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================
_____
Climb to the top of the charts! Play Star Shuffle: the word scramble
challenge with star power. Play Now!
<http://club.live.com/star_shuffle.aspx?icid=starshuffle_wlmailtextlink_oct>
_____
=======================================================
List services made available by First Step Internet,
serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
http://www.fsr.net
mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
=======================================================
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20071016/f8ba502e/attachment.html
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list