[Vision2020] Tragedy Highlights Reasons for Concern about Sitler

[J Ford]

"Judging by the number of off-list emails I have received, most people
>are grateful for the information I have provided regarding Mr Sitler
>and his probationary status."

A. How many would that include, Dougie - 2?  mayhap, 3?

B.  Since we are not privvy to your e-mails, are we just to assume you are 
telling the truth about those e-mail contents and/or opinions?  Don't 
believe I'll do that, thank you very much.

C.  Just what kind of "information" have you provided and since when can 
that be said to be accurate and/or even close to the truth?  And just how is 
it you came by that "information"?


J  :]





>From: "Glenn Schwaller" <vpschwaller at gmail.com>
>To: vision2020 at moscow.com
>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Tragedy Highlights Reasons for Concern about 
>Sitler
>Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 10:05:03 -0700
>
>Visionaries,
>
>Judging by the number of off-list emails I have received, most people
>are grateful for the information I have provided regarding Mr Sitler
>and his probationary status.  I have not gone through my posts line by
>line but I shall, and attempt to identify what I have written that
>leads you to think I am "trying to convince (you that you) really have
>nothing to worry about with respect to . .  .Steven Sitler."
>
>My first post addressed a "general" question by Mr Hansen on sex
>offender registration.  I assumed he was referring to Mr Sitler's
>pending release, but he did not mention any names.
>
>Subsequent posts were designed to answer questions on what I
>understand to be the specifics of Mr Sitler's probation, and how
>things would be monitored.  If the tenor of those posts made it sound
>as if you have nothing to worry about, that was most certainly NOT my
>intention.  At the risk of sounding repetitive, "Here are the
>guidelines P & P will most likely follow."  How well those guidelines
>will be followed, how effectively Mr Sitler will be monitored, how
>morally or ethically correct those guidelines are, I cannot say.  All
>I can do is try to give information.
>
>As I stated in one post "I suppose one could always call P & P and
>voice one's concerns to the resident corrections people in Moscow.  I
>suspect they like to keep on top of what the locals think and would
>like to know."  The last time I checked there was one (1) inquiry.
>  "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people
>to do nothing."  Well I guess one is better than none.
>
>"whose real name most of us have figured out"
>
>At the risk of sound "apologetic" once again, I'm sorry but Glenn
>Schwaller lives, breathes,and exists.  No, I am NOT who you think I am
>"hid(ing) behind a pseudonym for the umpteenth time . . ."
>
>"Schwaller" holds out to us as empty reassurance that our children are 
>safe."
>
>I have done no such thing.  Are the two P & P officers in Latah county
>overworked? I think that goes without saying.  Is that a good thing?
>Of course not.  Do I think things could and should be better? Of
>course.  Would I trust Mr Sitler with my kids?  With any kids?  Of
>course not.  Would I trust him under the direct supervision of an
>approved chaperone?  Only if I had to, but I would do whatever is
>necessary to keep my kids as far away from Mr Sitler as possible -
>chaperoned or not.  Would I point out to my kids who Mr Sitler is and
>why they need to avoid him?  Of course.
>
>I would hope that Mr Sitler's situation, and the recent tragedy
>inflicted by Mr Hamilton would serve as a wake-up all for all to
>rethink and re-evaluate how our justice and corrections system is
>funded and functions.
>
>I'm sorry you think I am playing games with you and your children and
>their safety.  I assure you I do no such thing.
>
>Schwaller
>
>On 5/21/07, Saundra Lund <sslund at roadrunner.com> wrote:
> > Visionaires:
> >
> > Apologist "Glenn Schwaller" -- whose real name most of us have figured 
>out
> > despite his cowardice of unsuccessfully trying to hide behind a 
>pseudonym
> > for the umpteenth time -- has spent more than a fair amount of cyber-ink
> > trying to convince us we really have nothing to worry about with respect 
>to
> > the Kirk's serial (although our anemic system sought justice for only 
>one of
> > his victims) pedophile Steven Sitler.
> >
> > After all, "Schwaller" shrilly insists, Sitler has had limits placed on 
>him
> > as a result of his conviction and sentencing, plus he's subject to 
>oversight
> > by P&P.
> >
> > While there are still many unknowns, we now know Jason Hamilton had 
>limits
> > placed on him as a result of his conviction.  Hamilton, too, was under 
>the
> > oversight of P&P, the same P&P "Schwaller" holds out to us as empty
> > reassurance that our children are safe.
> >
> > One of the terms of Hamilton's 6 June 2006 conviction and resulting
> > probation was that he wasn't to possess any firearms.
> >
> > The Latah County Prosecutor's Office brought Hamilton up on unspecified
> > probation violation charge(s) 4 April 2007.
> >
> > Hamilton appeared in court just last Tuesday, 15 May 2007, where he
> > apparently was allowed to remain free in spite of probation 
>violation(s).
> >
> > In addition to the two semi-automatic rifles Hamilton used in his 
>attacks on
> > his wife and our community, other guns have now been found in his home 
>as
> > well.
> >
> > This in spite of the terms placed on him as a result of his conviction.
> > This in spite of his oversight by P&P.
> >
> > Yeah, our children are safe from Steven Sitler:  those conditions and
> > oversight by P&P will keep our kids safe.  Yeahhhh, riigghhtt.
> >
> > I'm sure questions will be asked in the coming days and weeks about how 
>many
> > P&P officers we have in Latah County, how heavy their case loads are, 
>and
> > how Hamilton managed to have several guns in spite of the terms of his
> > probation and his monitoring by P&P.
> >
> > For now, I just want to point out *exactly* how dangerous a game 
>"Schwaller"
> > has been trying to play -- unsuccessfully, I hope -- with those of us 
>who
> > care about *all* the children in our community.
> >
> >
> > Saundra Lund
> > Moscow, ID
> >
> > The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people to 
>do
> > nothing.
> > - Edmund Burke
> >
> > ***** Original material contained herein is Copyright 2006 through life 
>plus
> > 70 years, Saundra Lund. Do not copy, forward, excerpt, or reproduce 
>outside
> > the Vision 2020 forum without the express written permission of the
> > author.*****
> >
> >
> >
> > =======================================================
> >  List services made available by First Step Internet,
> >  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> >                http://www.fsr.net
> >           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> > =======================================================
> >
>
>=======================================================
>  List services made available by First Step Internet,
>  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>                http://www.fsr.net
>           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>=======================================================

_________________________________________________________________
PC Magazine’s 2007 editors’ choice for best Web mail—award-winning Windows 
Live Hotmail. 
http://imagine-windowslive.com/hotmail/?locale=en-us&ocid=TXT_TAGHM_migration_HM_mini_pcmag_0507