[Vision2020] Steven J. Sitler
privatejf32 at hotmail.com
Sat May 12 10:34:09 PDT 2007
Sitler did was he was told to do (re: apologizing) NOT because he wanted to
or believed what he was saying. PERIOD!!!
Child molesters love what they do, do not care that they hurt children or
ruin their lives and have NO (that's ZERO) remorse for the pain and damage
they cause. His "apology" and your accepting it was and is as worthless as
it is empty.
Getting on Art and/or Tom only serves to make the "apology" even more hallow
as it is another attempt to distract from the real crime and crimes that
Sitler engages in. It just supports his bs and that of Dougie-Boy.
Feel like a big man if you must, but don't do it on the back of the children
that Sitler (and Dougie-Boy) have and do hurt.
>From: "Glenn Schwaller" <vpschwaller at gmail.com>
>To: vision2020 at moscow.com
>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Steven J. Sitler
>Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 10:06:34 -0700
>Thank you Ms Lund for also seeing the heinous fallacy of Mr. Fox's
>post. As I pointed out in a previous post, Mr Hansen also agreed with
>Mr Fox, and
>I think both need to be called on the carpet for their stand - be it
>sarcastic or not, and both should apologize to the viewers and
>contributors of this site.
>I would note that even Mr Sitler was responsible enough to stand in
>open court and apologize for his actions. Yes, it may very well have
>been self serving of him
>to do so, but nonetheless he did apologize. As of this post, I don't
>see where neither Mr Fox nor Mr Hansen has done so.
>I would say again, to both of you "Shame on you." And shame on any
>others who even for a minute thought the suggestion of Mr Sitler
>boarding with Mr Wilson's grandchildren
>"an excellent suggestion."
>Ms Lund writes "I don't know that I have expressed this well . . ."
>Ms Lund, no one could have expressed it better.
>On 5/11/07, Saundra Lund <sslund at roadrunner.com> wrote:
>OK, I get the sarcasm in your post.
>However, your post ***really*** bothers me, so I'm going to speak up.
>I just don't think it EVER appropriate to suggest putting children in
>way just to prove a point, sarcasm or not.
>The children you reference have done NOTHING to deserve such treatment, and
>it is deeply offensive to me that you bring the these precious beings up to
>make a point. As probably most here know, I think children deserve to be
>completely OFF LIMITS as "targets" here on the Viz, and your post is one of
>the most offensive I've read here. The children to whom you refer -- along
>with every single child in our community -- are our future, and to suggest
>deliberately putting these innocents in harm's way is indefensible, IMHO.
>Just for the record, I'll disclose that except for the newest addition,
>met & spent time with the truly delightful children you've dragged into
>this. But, even if I hadn't, I'd be just as . . . disgusted.
>Please, please, PLEASE LEAVE individual CHILDREN OUT of this discussion, a
>discussion we wouldn't be having were it not for the fact that Steven J.
>Sitler, a serial child predator who has already victimized far too many
>children in this country, came to our community.
>Discuss Sitler; discuss his crimes; discuss the failure (IMHO) of the
>judicial system; discuss the failure of our newspapers; discuss why Sitler
>came here; discuss the failure of Christ Church to warn our community once
>his crimes were known by the church hierarchy; discuss the failure of the
>Christ Church community warn the rest of us once they knew; discuss the
>problem of child sexual abuse in general or in our community, region,
>I don't know that I've expressed this well, but your post crosses a line
>me, Wayne . . . a line I hope to never again see crossed here on V2020.
>Some, no doubt, will ask the trite question, "By whose standards?!?"
>My response to those who will lack the courage to ask the question here is,
>"If you have to ask that question about this subject, you are already a
>soul for whom I'll pray."
>The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people to do
>- Edmund Burke
>On 5/12/07, Tom Hansen <thansen at moscow.com> wrote:
>>Steven James Sitler is now listed (and registered) as a sex offender in
>>state of Idaho.
>>As such I will not be distributing posters detailing his conviction,
>>sentence, and subsequent release as a sex offender.
>>"Uh, how about a 1-strike law. Death doesn't seem too extreme for a
>>- Dale "Comb-Over" Courtney (August 3, 2005)
>>List services made available by First Step Internet,
>>serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>> mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
PC Magazines 2007 editors choice for best Web mailaward-winning Windows
More information about the Vision2020