[Vision2020] Steven J. Sitler

Sat May 12 10:31:13 PDT 2007

Mr. Schwaller -

For the sake of setting the record (as well as my intentions) straight and
as my final commentary concerning your response, the purpose behind my
support for Wayne' suggestion was solely to encourage Doug Wilson to stand
behind his words (an act I have yet to experience from him).

Having said that, I apologize for your failure in understanding my
intention.  Perhaps the theme of my previous dozen or so postings was
insufficiently clear to you.

If you find my apology lacking in any attribute, so be it.  We are all big
boys and girls. 

Tom Hansen

Moscow, Idaho

"Uh, how about a 1-strike law. Death doesn't seem too extreme for a Level-3
sex offender."

- Dale "Comb-Over" Courtney (August 3, 2005)

  _____  

From: vision2020-bounces at moscow.com [mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com]
On Behalf Of Glenn Schwaller
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2007 10:07 AM
To: vision2020 at moscow.com
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Steven J. Sitler

Thank you Ms Lund for also seeing the heinous fallacy of Mr. Fox's post.  As
I pointed out in a previous post, Mr Hansen also agreed with Mr Fox, and 

I think both need to be called on the carpet for their stand - be it
sarcastic or not, and both should apologize to the viewers and contributors
of this site.

I would note that even Mr Sitler was responsible enough to stand in open
court and apologize for his actions.  Yes, it may very well have been self
serving of him 

to do so, but nonetheless he did apologize.  As of this post, I don't see
where neither Mr Fox nor Mr Hansen has done so.

I would say again, to both of you "Shame on you."  And shame on any others
who even for a minute thought the suggestion of Mr Sitler boarding with Mr
Wilson's grandchildren 

"an excellent suggestion."

Ms Lund writes "I don't know that I have expressed this well . . ."

Ms Lund, no one could have expressed it better.

Thank you

Schwaller

On 5/11/07, Saundra Lund <sslund at 
roadrunner.com> wrote:

Hi Wayne,

OK, I get the sarcasm in your post.

However, your post ***really*** bothers me, so I'm going to speak up.

I just don't think it EVER appropriate to suggest putting children in harm's

way just to prove a point, sarcasm or not.

The children you reference have done NOTHING to deserve such treatment, and

it is deeply offensive to me that you bring the these precious beings up to

make a point.  As probably most here know, I think children deserve to be

completely OFF LIMITS as "targets" here on the Viz, and your post is one of

the most offensive I've read here.  The children to whom you refer -- along

with every single child in our community -- are our future, and to suggest

deliberately putting these innocents in harm's way is indefensible, IMHO.

Just for the record, I'll disclose that except for the newest addition, I've

met & spent time with the truly delightful children you've dragged into

this.  But, even if I hadn't, I'd be just as . . .  disgusted.

Please, please, PLEASE LEAVE individual CHILDREN OUT of this discussion, a

discussion we wouldn't be having were it not for the fact that Steven J.

Sitler, a serial child predator who has already victimized far too many

children in this country, came to our community.

Discuss Sitler; discuss his crimes; discuss the failure (IMHO) of the

judicial system; discuss the failure of our newspapers; discuss why Sitler

came here; discuss the failure of Christ Church to warn our community once

his crimes were known by the church hierarchy; discuss the failure of the

Christ Church community warn the rest of us once they knew; discuss the

problem of child sexual abuse in general or in our community, region, state,

nation, world.

I don't know that I've expressed this well, but your post crosses a line for

me, Wayne . . . a line I hope to never again see crossed here on V2020.

Some, no doubt, will ask the trite question, "By whose standards?!?"

My response to those who will lack the courage to ask the question here is,

"If you have to ask that question about this subject, you are already a lost

soul for whom I'll pray."

Saundra Lund

Moscow, ID

The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people to do

nothing.

- Edmund Burke

On 5/12/07, Tom Hansen <thansen at moscow.com> wrote:

Steven James Sitler is now listed (and registered) as a sex offender in the
state of Idaho.

http://isp.state.id.us/so_viewer/showSO.do?nic=SX06787 

As such I will not be distributing posters detailing his conviction,
sentence, and subsequent release as a sex offender.

Tom Hansen
Moscow, Idaho

"Uh, how about a 1-strike law. Death doesn't seem too extreme for a Level-3 
sex offender."

- Dale "Comb-Over" Courtney (August 3, 2005)

=======================================================
List services made available by First Step Internet,
serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
               http://www.fsr.net
          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
======================================================= 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20070512/ccc7e043/attachment.html 