[Vision2020] Amazonian Deforestation and Global Warming:Was:Ed theViking, Greenland, and Global Warming

Tony tonytime at clearwire.net
Sat Mar 31 09:39:37 PDT 2007


Ted makes an important point about the political pressures faced by scientists in an academic environment which encourages if not enforces conformity to conventional wisdom.  The resulting group think is hardly conducive to flushing out truth from prejudice and presumption. In such an environment where one's doctoral thesis if it is to be accepted, must tow the left wing, humanity is the root of all evil paradigm, it is obvious how an aspiring scholar might be tempted to slant her research to please those who hold her future in their hands.

The university is alleged to be a place where a variety of views are thoughtfully considered if not embraced.

Would that it were so.

-T
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Ted Moffett 
  To: nickgier at adelphia.net 
  Cc: vision2020 at moscow.com 
  Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 2:16 PM
  Subject: [Vision2020] Amazonian Deforestation and Global Warming:Was:Ed theViking, Greenland, and Global Warming



  Nick et. al.

  I'm not sure you should defer to my research on methane and other global warming impacts of livestock, given the complexity and room for error on such a difficult subject.  But this interesting analysis that can be read in pdf form at the web link below, that in part examines cattle raising impacts on the Amazon rain forest, might shed light on this issue. 

  I cannot vouch for the correctness of the data and conclusions from this study presented in 1996, especially given the rapid rate of change in that area of the world, indeed, all over our planet.  However, this paper reveals the daunting complexity of environmental studies, while demonstrating the exacting and sobering work that constitutes the day to day efforts of most scientists, who usually don't have the inclination to politicise their work, despite the claims of many that the hundreds of scientists gathering data on global warming have an agenda to slant their conclusions towards alarmism on human induced global warming.  

  Given that scientists sometimes face political, career, or economic pressures to slant their work, defending the independence of the community of scientists to present their findings without these pressures biasing their efforts, is fundamental if the public is to be accurately informed of major scientific developments that can significantly impact the world at large, such as climate change from human activity. 

  Recently on C-SPAN testimony of NASA climate scientist James Hansen before the US Congress was presented.  He mentioned that he thought the censorship of his scientific conclusions regarding human impacts on global warming, by the Bush administration, was akin to the censorship of science in the former Soviet Union.  

  http://philip.inpa.gov.br/publ_livres/Preprints/1996/REPLACE-FEM.pdf 
   
  -----
  Ted Moffett
   
  On 3/15/07, nickgier at adelphia.net <nickgier at adelphia.net> wrote: 
    Greetings:

    I've not seen this message in my in-box, so I'm sending it again.

    I just wanted to verify that my source on methane release from livestock was from the UN's FAO report that Megan cited. 

    However, I respect Ted's research and reasoning skills and I would be happy to defer to his judgment on this issue since he has done more research on this than anyone on this list.

    Thanks, Ted, for making it clear that raising beef cattle, no matter how they fart, is a terribly inefficient and enviornmentally disastrous way of getting the protein that we need. 

    Nick Gier




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  =======================================================
   List services made available by First Step Internet, 
   serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.   
                 http://www.fsr.net                       
            mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
  =======================================================
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20070331/5386a121/attachment.html 


More information about the Vision2020 mailing list