[Vision2020] Exploring Global Warming: Scientific Consensus?

[Andreas Schou]

On 3/19/07, lfalen <lfalen at turbonet.com> wrote:
> Ted
> I normally do not respond to dares ar challenges.  I never accepted any when I was a kid and wont now. I listed several respected scientists that did not agree with the prevailing dogma. I will list mors as I have the time. I am not committed to either scenario.however I think that there are plenty of holes in Al Gore's "The inconvenient Truth." I just read some place that he even admitted that he had exaggerated the case, but that was ok in order to get people to listen. I would prefer to listen to what scientists have to say, not Al Gore. Also it is worth checking where their funding source is. On one side it may be the government or a a group with a left wing agenda. On the other it may be a company with a financial stake. I think that this is relevant.

Roger --

There are many respected scientists that dispute modern understandings
of global warming. The problem is that there are no respected
climatologists that do. A Ph.D in a physical science is not an unbound
certificate of credibility when you hold forth on areas of science you
know absolutely nothing about.

-- ACS