[Vision2020] binoculars in one hand schwaller in the other

Dougs Hero bherodotus at yahoo.com
Sat Jun 30 22:47:11 PDT 2007


Dear Mr. Schwaller,

You are wrong when you wrote, “there was no criminal
activity, so the counselor had no legal obligation to
report it. In fact, he had a legal obligation to not
say anything!”

According to condition number 4 of Steven Sitler’s
“Sexual Offender Agreement of Supervision,” Sitler
agreed that he would not “engage in any deviant
behaviors including but not limited to . . .
voyeurism.” Consequently, while it may be legal for
Pastor Wilson to spy on his flock, it was a violation
of his probation for Sitler to hold his binoculars in
one hand and his schwaller in the other.

Furthermore, condition number 1 of the “Valley
Treatment Specialties Treatment Contract” required
Sitler to tell his counselor EVERYTHING and condition
number 2 required him to waive his privilege. The
counselor had no legal or ethical obligation to
maintain confidence, and you can be sure his contract
with the state required him to tell all.

Sitler signed away his right to privacy just as though
he attended the Kirk, except that in the Kirk it’s
assumed, not written.

Dougs’ Hero


       
____________________________________________________________________________________
Yahoo! oneSearch: Finally, mobile search 
that gives answers, not web links. 
http://mobile.yahoo.com/mobileweb/onesearch?refer=1ONXIC



More information about the Vision2020 mailing list