[Vision2020] Ten Sitler Questions
J Ford
privatejf32 at hotmail.com
Fri Jun 29 22:11:03 PDT 2007
Sorry to be so blunt, but "F" Sitler's rights! What "RIGHT" does he have to
commit and continue to commit these types of crimes against our childrens?
What "RIGHT" does he have to be ALLOWED to commit these types of crimes?
What "RIGHT" does he have to make our children targets of his sick, twisted
fantasies?
I have NO pity for this type of offender...you have no idea what harm and
ever-lasting damage his kind force onto the most innocent of our citizens.
Speaking from first hand knowledge - his type of behavior is a KILLER of the
children it is foisted upon.
So again I say "F" Sitler's "rights" - the second he decided this was his
lifestyle that he wants to engage in, he gave up ANY "rights" he may have or
will have...forever!!!
And, what makes you think he or his type are not putting our children's
pictures on the internet for other of his ilk to drool over, dream about,
masturbate from. I don't see you crying for those children's "exposure"
which is totally unwanted and dangerous. It permanently marks those
children - do you really think his "rights" outweigh those of his victims?
The "witch" hunt was begun by Sitler and others like him against our
children. When are you going to get it that THAT is what needs to be
stopped? Other offender's crimes are posted and broadcast all over the news
to the minutest detail...why not Sitler's?
J :]
>From: Paul Rumelhart <godshatter at yahoo.com>
>To: Vision 2020 <vision2020 at moscow.com>
>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Ten Sitler Questions
>Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 21:30:53 -0700
>
>Ok, time for an unpopular viewpoint. Are we taking this too far? Where do
>we draw the line between protection of the public and this man's rights? I
>understand that he lost many rights when he did what he did. But couldn't
>we be taking things too far?
>
>Yes, binoculars can enable his voyeurism. However, he can actually see
>without them through his eyeballs. Should we gouge them out as a
>precaution?
>
>I agree with you on the questions about why he was let out on parole so
>early, I agree that he's probably at high risk to reoffend. I think we
>would be better off if he served more of his original sentence. I
>understand that children need to be protected. But where do we draw the
>line? We're posting this man's episodes of masturbation on a public
>forum.
>
>I see the makings of a witch-hunt here, and it makes me uncomfortable.
>
>Just my opinion.
>
>Paul
>
>Art Deco wrote:
>>Here is a letter from one of the persons providing sexual offender
>>treatment to Steven Sitler. This letter is found as part of a /Report of
>>Probation Violation/ filed in the court by Senior Probation Officer Jackye
>>Squires Leonard.
>>
>>
>>Dalton Lombard, D.Min, LCPC
>>
>>P O Box 1911
>>
>>Lewiston, Id. 83501
>>
>>
>>
>>June 18, 2007
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Jackie Squires
>>
>>Probation and Parole
>>
>>Moscow Idaho 83843
>>
>>
>>
>>RE. Steven Shier
>>
>>
>>
>>Dear Ms. Squires,
>>
>>
>>
>>This note is in response lo our Telephone conversation today. During the
>>weekly check in time for the offender group I lead for Valley Treatment
>>Specialties Mr. Sitler reported that he had masturbated on two occasions
>>during the previous week. When asked for more detail about the
>>circumstances and fantasies he experienced during his masturbation he
>>reported that he had been looking in a neighbor's window with his
>>binoculars. As a result he became aroused and later masturbated. He denied
>>viewing anyone at the residence but acknowledged that he was aroused by
>>looking in the window. He stated to the group that voyeurism is one of the
>>behaviors be engaged in prior to and leading up to the offences he was
>>convicted of.
>>
>>
>>
>>I consider this to be a very high risk behavior for Mr. Sitler considering
>>he had been out of jail less than a month at the lime he reported the
>>behavior. In my mind this behavior constitutes a violation of his parole
>>and of his treatment contract with Valley Treatment Specialties.
>>
>>
>>
>>Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
>>
>>
>>
>>/s/
>>
>>Dalton Lombard
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>The contents of this letter and other events raise some questions.
>>
>>
>>
>>First, with respect to the binoculars:
>>
>>
>>
>>1. When did Sitler acquire the binoculars?
>>
>>2. Did he previously possess them and someone returned them to him, did
>>he lately acquire them, or did someone lately acquire them for him?
>>
>>
>>
>>Given his history of voyeurism and its leading up pedophilic incidents:
>>
>>
>>
>>3. What was his motivation for either acquiring or keeping the
>>binoculars?
>>
>>4. Shouldn't the possession of binoculars been a no-no in his probation
>>agreement?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Second, considering the comment "I consider this to be a very high risk
>>behavior for Mr. Sitler" from his therapist:
>>
>>
>>
>>5. Why was bail granted at all?
>>
>>6. Is he not a high risk to reoffend?
>>
>>7. Why hasn't a Motion to Revoke Probation been filed by the
>>prosecuting attorney so that an evidentiary hearing can be held and a
>>decision whether to revoke probation or not be made by the court?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>There is a new letter from Dr. Lombard to Judge Stegner now in the file:
>>
>>
>>
>>8. Why has this letter been sealed?
>>
>>9. Aren't the citizens whose children who are now at risk with Sitler
>>out on probation entitled to the information which would allow them to:
>>
>> a. Evaluate the risk?
>>
>> b. Express their opinions to the prosecutor, media, etc.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Sitler was ordered by the court to vacate his current residence on June
>>19, 2007. Today is June 29, 2007. The screen snapshot just below was
>>taken at 7:30 pm today (06/29/07).
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>According to the Idaho Central Sexual Offender Website
>>http://www.isp.state.id.us/identification/sex_offender/obligations.html
>>Sitler is obligated to:
>>
>>
>>
>>Within 2 working days of changing the address or location of residence
>>within the county where the sex offender is registered, the offender must
>>complete an address change form in person with the sheriff of that county
>>of the change.
>>
>>
>>
>>OR
>>
>>
>>
>>Within 5 working days of moving to another state, the registered sex
>>offender must provide written notice of the move to the central sex
>>offender registry. The person must also register in the other State within
>>the time period required by that State, but not to exceed 10 days.
>>
>>
>>
>>10. Has Sitler complied with the above but for administrative
>>ineptitude his State of Idaho sexual offender profile has not yet been
>>updated?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>As of now, a status hearing on this matter is scheduled for Monday, July
>>2nd at 2:00 pm. Since schedules can change, those interested should call
>>the Clerk of the Court's office early Monday to check for any change
>>(Courthouse: 882-8580).
>>
>>
>>Wayne A. Fox
>>1009 Karen Lane
>>PO Box 9421
>>Moscow, ID 83843
>> (208) 882-7975
>>waf at moscow.com <mailto:waf at moscow.com>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>=======================================================
>> List services made available by First Step Internet, serving the
>>communities of the Palouse since 1994. http://www.fsr.net
>> mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>>=======================================================
>
>=======================================================
> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> http://www.fsr.net
> mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>=======================================================
_________________________________________________________________
Don’t miss your chance to WIN $10,000 and other great prizes from Microsoft
Office Live http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/aub0540003042mrt/direct/01/
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list