[Vision2020] love for police

[lfalen]

keely
Your argument is good, but there are trade offs to everything. Some people will always benefit from the work of others.
Individual freedom should be paramount.

Roger
-----Original message-----
From: keely emerinemix kjajmix1 at msn.com
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 19:13:43 -0700
To: lfalen lfalen at turbonet.com,  Tom Ivie the_ivies3 at yahoo.com, vision2020 at moscow.com
Subject: RE: [Vision2020] love for police

> 
> The problem with "right to work" is that those who don't want to join the union nonetheless end up benefiting from its work and representation.  I'd be impressed, I suppose, if those who holler loudest for their "right to work" without joining a union would immediately then give up any benefits and pay raises earned by the union they choose not to support.keely"And these women that you spit on as they try to change their worlds/Are immune to your consultations . . . they're quite aware of what they're going through"(With apologies to David Bowie)> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 15:44:45 -0700> From: lfalen at turbonet.com> To: the_ivies3 at yahoo.com; vision2020 at moscow.com> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] love for police> > My view is that anyone should be able to join what ever group the want, union or otherwise. No one should be forced to join a union as a condition of employment. If individual members of the police force wanted to join a union they should have been able to. Those that do n!
 ot want
to should not be t required to do so.> > Roger> -----Original message-----> From: Tom Ivie the_ivies3 at yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 14:56:06 -0700> To: vision2020 at moscow.com> Subject: [Vision2020] love for police> > > I like the way everyone professes their gratitude to the police now but not when the police wanted to do something "radical" like unionizing. It amazes me to hear some of the same people say that they love the police when they or groups they associate with actively worked to squash the Police Union.> >          To my knowledge, the police don’t usually ask for a lot.  I never hear them complain. Yet, the one time they speak up about something they do want, we shut them down. Maybe the issues they wanted a union for have been resolved, I don’t know.  > >  > >  It just strikes a nerve with me to hear “we love them so much” out of one side of the mouth and “no union for you” out of the other side.  They give and we take?  Why can’t they give and !
 we give
back to them.  Is the love for the police and hate (by some) for their unionization a mutually exclusive bipartition dichotomy or a logical fallacy?  Discussion?    > >  > > > > Tom & Liz Ivie> >        > > ---------------------------------> > Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: mail, news, photos & more. > > > > =======================================================>  List services made available by First Step Internet, >  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.   >                http://www.fsr.net                       >           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com> =======================================================
> _________________________________________________________________
> Hotmail to go? Get your Hotmail, news, sports and much more! Check out the New MSN Mobile! 
> http://mobile.msn.com
>