[Vision2020] Criags response

[Sunil Ramalingam]

Kai,

It certainly hasn't escaped me or those of all political persuasions that I 
speak to that Craig tried to use his status to avoid the charge.  I think it 
hasn't been a focal point of discussion here, but I doubt it's gone 
un-noticed.

The discussion is ongoing because of Craig's ongoing denials.  And it's not 
liberals, it's his own party that's turned on him most viciously.  You may 
not care less about his sexual preferences, but they couldn't care more.

Sunil


>From: Kai Eiselein <fotopro63 at hotmail.com>
>To: <vision2020 at moscow.com>
>Subject: [Vision2020] Criags response
>Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 04:47:33 +0000
>
>
>I find it odd that all you who say sexuality doesn't matter are happily 
>engaged in a discussion of Craig's sexuality. Just following the national 
>pundits, I suppose.
>I couldn't care less about what he does with other adults.
>
>What troubles me, and seems to have escaped most everyone else in the usual 
>rush to judge, is the apparent fact that Craig attempted to use his 
>position as a congressman to try to intimidate the arresting officer(s).
>Too often, those in power, use that power to get away with things the rest 
>of us would pay dearly for.
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Invite your mail contacts to join your friends list with Windows Live 
>Spaces. It's easy!
>http://spaces.live.com/spacesapi.aspx?wx_action=create&wx_url=/friends.aspx&mkt=en-us


>=======================================================
>  List services made available by First Step Internet,
>  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>                http://www.fsr.net
>           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>=======================================================