[Vision2020] Craig's official statement

[Sunil Ramalingam]

I don't believe Larry Craig has a law degree.

Sunil


>From: Joe Campbell <joekc at adelphia.net>
>To: lfalen <lfalen at turbonet.com>
>CC: vision2020 at moscow.com
>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Craig's official statement
>Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 14:37:49 -0700
>
>Roger,
>
>That Craig merely touched someone else's foot seems to go against the
>information in the police report that Tom posted, as well as information on 
>the
>CNN website found here:
>
>http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/08/28/craig.arrest/index.html
>
>Tell me, why would they charge Craig for "lewd conduct" if all he did was
>touch another man's foot with his own foot? Why would Craig -- someone with
>a law degree -- plead guilty if this is all that happened? It doesn't add 
>up.
>
>Notice that on the CNN website it says: "A police officer who arrested him
>June 11 said Craig peered through a crack in a restroom stall door for two
>minutes and made gestures suggesting to the officer he wanted to engage in
>'lewd conduct.' ... 'Craig would look down at his hands, "fidget" with his
>fingers, and then look through the crack into my stall again,' Karsnia 
>wrote in
>documents accompanying the arrest report."
>
>Tell me, do you give Michael Vick the benefit of the doubt? Do you say, 
>"Well,
>he just plead guilty in order to save himself some trouble. That doesn't 
>mean
>he is guilty of any crime." Or do you take his case for what it is, i.e., a
>genuine admission of guilt. And if you treat Vick differently, why?
>
>--
>Joe Campbell
>
>---- lfalen <lfalen at turbonet.com> wrote:
>
>=============