[Vision2020] Army Officer Accuses His Generals of Iraq Failures
Paul Rumelhart
godshatter at yahoo.com
Sun Apr 29 01:00:07 PDT 2007
I would be quite surprised to learn that Sunil doesn't love our
country. However, I don't know him so how am I to refute that? Sunil
is more than capable of defending himself if he chooses to. I am
impressed by him, based upon everything I've read here.
At the end, it boiled down to Donovan wishing that Sunil came out and
said more positive things about our country. That was a compromise that
seemed to me to be "fair enough". I'm not defending anything else that
was said in the exchange.
Why should I bother being conciliatory or irenic if I don't recognize
honest attempts to reach middle ground?
Paul
P.S. I thought you had made a typo with "irenic" and meant "ironic". I
was trying to figure that one out until I looked it up and found it was
a word and that it meant "operating toward peace, moderation, or
conciliation". I've never come across that word before.
keely emerinemix wrote:
> Here's the thing, Paul. I do know the guy, and you're not likely to
> meet too many people with more integrity than Sunil.
>
> I've admired your conciliatory and irenic tone in the past, but
> there's nothing "fair enough" about anything Donovan has said in this
> or any other exchange. I'm not qualified to judge what he does
> deserve, but one thing Donovan doesn't deserve is the benefit of the
> doubt, and I would suggest that Sunil has more than proved, beyond a
> shadow of a doubt, that he is a fine and decent man who loves his country.
>
> keely
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 22:15:30 -0700
> From: godshatter at yahoo.com
> To: vision2020 at moscow.com
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Army Officer Accuses His Generals of
> Iraq Failures
>
> Fair enough.
>
> I'd think that the fact that he is doing what he can to change
> what he doesn't like is evidence enough that he appreciates this
> country. But I don't know the guy, so I have no way of knowing if
> that's true or not.
>
> Paul
>
> Donovan Arnold wrote:
>
> Paul,
>
> I agree with most of what you said. But I believe there is a
> difference between a citizen genuinely making a constructive
> criticism and someone just out to point out flaws in our
> government and divide people.
>
> I don't disagree with Sunil's arguments against Bush and our
> country, I just disagree with his motives and dangerous
> solutions to problems.
>
> A guy that does nothing but attack the character of our
> country, its uniformed members, and never praising it,
> ever, raises concerns for me.
>
> I'm saying, it sure would be nice if Sunil could say something
> nice about the country instead of bashing it and supporting
> its enemy's agenda 100% of the time.
>
> Best,
>
> Donovan
>
>
> */Paul Rumelhart <godshatter at yahoo.com>
> <mailto:godshatter at yahoo.com>/* wrote:
>
> An attempt to put this in perspective.
>
> The United States of America differs from some other
> countries in that it is a government of the people, by the
> people, and for the people. Our President, along with all
> other elected officials, is an ordinary citizen who is
> supposedly carrying a burden in a self-less act of
> devotion to the rest of us. He is not royal, he is not a
> deity, and he is not of an official upper class. He works
> for us. He does not have the license to tell us what is
> "patriotic" and what is not. What he says about it is not
> Royal Decree, religious dogma, nor law. It is the opinion
> of a fellow citizen that coincidentally happens to bring
> him more personal power if you agree with him.
>
> Thus, it makes sense to keep an eye on him and to make
> sure that he is doing what *we* want him to do, not what
> *he* wants to do. If he is doing something that goes
> against what the people voted him in to do, then they are
> obligated to do something about it. To do otherwise would
> be to turn your back on the idea of a representational
> government. One way of "doing something" about it is to
> make your concerns known publicly. Sunil, and others like
> him, should be commended for not allowing our
> representative to work against our wishes.
>
> Our President is not representing me when he decides that
> we can be allowed to use torture in our daily conduct as a
> nation, merely because he can argue some loopholes in the
> Geneva conventions. Thus, I make this known. He is not
> representing me when he decides that he can spy on our
> private communications without legal warrants, especially
> when he arrogantly ignores the process already in place
> that is not onerous to get those warrants. Thus, I make
> this known as well. He is not representing me when he
> orders secret camps in other countries to be built to take
> our prisoners to when he wants them tortured without
> benefit of public scrutiny, nor when he uses
> "extraordinary rendition" to send suspects to other
> countries where he knows they will be tortured. He is not
> representing me when he uses "signing statements" to
> change laws he doesn't like into laws he does like. He is
> not representing me when he bull-headedly sticks to his
> Iraq strategy when it is clear that he doesn't have
> popular support for it, especially knowing that he got us
> into this war with bad arguments made from bad data that
> he knew was not true when he used that data to manipulate
> us into backing him in this war.
>
> To remain silent is to betray your fellow citizens in the
> representative democracy that we live in. To "attack our
> country" by stating our opinions and declaring "NO!" when
> we need to IS patriotism.
>
> Paul
>
> Donovan Arnold wrote:
>
> Reverend Keely,
>
> For the 409382th time, I already told you, I am
> autistic, I don't have a real sense of embarrassment.
> Why that doesn't stick in your head seems to escape
> me, other than you listen with emotions and
> feelings rather than intelligent rational
> thought. Perhaps not having rational thought is your
> disability.
>
> But, obviously having a sense of embarrassment doesn't
> keep you from saying stupid, cruel, arrogant,
> ignorant, and I guess embarrassing things either does it.
>
> I don't question Sunil's patriotism, I just question
> which country he places that patriotism in. He
> attacks our country regularly, he never says anything
> pleasant about it. He defends the Taliban, even those
> that attacked our troops. And now he is blaming our
> men and women in uniform for the failures in Iraqi
> that have done their job to the best of their ability
> and very heroically too, might I add.
>
> Sunil has taken great steps and carefully worded
> everything he has said to cover the fact that he has a
> strong disdain for the United States, and avoided
> every opportunity to cast doubt on that by me and others.
>
> He has every right to hate the United States if he
> wants to. Many people do. I just think he should be
> honest about it when he criticizes this country so
> that we can see it in the proper context. Right now, I
> view Sunil's words as words of a foreigner expressing
> his opinion of the United States. I cannot view him as
> a patriot questioning the policies of his
> country, until he gives me reason or tells me
> otherwise. He has not done so, and purposefully
> avoids doing so.
>
> But once again Reverend Keely, I appreciate your moral
> advise, for thou art holier than thee and all others.
> No doubt, in the end, the pitch fork in your arse will
> be not be as hot or sharp as the rest of ours.
>
> Best,
>
> Donovan
>
> */keely emerinemix <kjajmix1 at msn.com>
> <mailto:kjajmix1 at msn.com>/* wrote:
>
> At what point, Donovan, might it be said that
> you've embarrassed yourself quite enough? Is
> there a time that your brain and your keyboard
> will stop their collusion in making you appear as
> you do?
>
> I've met you. You're not that bad in person, and
> you undoubtedly have a lot of good traits. In
> fact, I found you quite pleasant. But for your
> own sake, as well as for the cause of civil
> discord, would you please reexamine whatever it is
> about email that turns you into such a badgering
> and bellicose pest?
>
> And please remember that I'm not ordained;
> "Reverend Keely" is far more than I'm entitled to.
>
> keely
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:55:03 -0700
> From: donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.com
> <mailto:donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.com>
> To: sunilramalingam at hotmail.com
> <mailto:sunilramalingam at hotmail.com>;
> vision2020 at moscow.com
> <mailto:vision2020 at moscow.com>
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Army Officer Accuses
> His Generals of Iraq Failures
>
> */Sunil,/*
>
> */You wrote:/*
> *//*
> "Poor Donovan, wants to be Eugene and ends up
> being Joseph."
>
> */Clearly, I am neither. If I was McCarthy you
> would praising me for my destruction of good
> leaders. If I were Joseph you would be at my
> feet. /*
> *//*
> */Don't blame others for not telling the truth
> when it cannot be uttered from your own lips. /*
> *//*
> */You have great courtroom tactics, Sunil. But
> I assure you, you have answered the question
> for those of us that wanted to know. /*
> *//*
> */Best,/*
> *//*
> */Donovan/*
> *//*
> *//*
> *//*
>
> */Sunil Ramalingam
> <sunilramalingam at hotmail.com>
> <mailto:sunilramalingam at hotmail.com>/* wrote:
>
> Moscow's McCarthy continues to display his
> love of freedom by imposing
> loyalty tests.
>
> Poor Donovan, wants to be Eugene and ends
> up being Joseph.
>
> Sunil
>
>
> >From: Donovan Arnold
> >To: Sunil Ramalingam ,
> vision2020 at moscow.com
> <mailto:vision2020 at moscow.com>
> >Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Army Officer
> Accuses His Generals of Iraq
> >Failures
> >Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 11:32:36 -0700 (PDT)
> >
> >Sunil,
> >
> > You wrote:
> >
> > "Bush has said that the military has
> been sent all the troops they
> >requested.
> >Why didn't the generals request more
> troops from the beginning? Why didn't
> >they admit how poorly things were going
> and put it back in the lap of the
> >administration?"
> >
> >
> > First, the Generals did ask for more
> troops and did give honest
> >appraisals of the situation, they just
> did not publish that information for
> >you and the enemy to see in the
> Washington Post and New York Times.
> >
> > Second, there were no more troops to be had.
> >
> > Third, more troops wouldn't solve the
> problem, it would just make the
> >problem larger. The problem was the
> political objective, not military
> >incompetence. They have guns not magic
> wands. This was Bush's blunder, not
> >the officers, soldiers, or generals over
> there.
> >
> > Fourth, it is UNACCEPTABLE for an
> officer to be going to the AP and
> >personally attack his commanding
> officers. There are proper ways of going
> >about filing a complaint about a
> misbehaving or incompetent commanding
> >officer. What this guy did was wrong and
> dangerous.
> >
> > Finally, we are still waiting for you to
> say, "I love my country, the
> >United States of America."
> >
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Donovan
> >
> >Sunil Ramalingam wrote:
> > Donovan,
> >
> >On the one hand I don't disagree that the
> administration 'screwed this war
> >up;' having said that, I think wars like
> this are always going to end in
> >failure. But since the war began, up
> until he announced the 'surge,' Bush
> >has said that the military has been sent
> all the troops they requested.
> >Why didn't the generals request more
> troops from the beginning? Why didn't
> >they admit how poorly things were going
> and put it back in the lap of the
> >administration?
> >
> >It seems to me that generals saw the
> treatment Gen. Shinseki received after
> >saying that four to five hundred thousand
> troops would be needed for the
> >war, and they didn't want the same
> treatment for themselves. That's their
> >fault, isn't it?
> >
> >Sunil
> >
> > >From: Donovan Arnold
> > >To: Tom Hansen , thansen at moscow.com
> <mailto:thansen at moscow.com>,
> > >vision2020 at moscow.com
> <mailto:vision2020 at moscow.com>
> > >Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Army Officer
> Accuses His Generals of Iraq
> > >Failures
> > >Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 10:38:06 -0700 (PDT)
> > >
> > >Complaining is one thing. But going to
> the media and to undermine the
> > >command structure of the military
> during an actual military action is not
> >a
> > >right.
> > >
> > > And I don't believe him anyway. I
> think it is the administration's fault
> > >for screwing this war up, not the generals.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > >
> > >Donovan
> > >
> >
> >
> >=======================================================
> >List services made available by First
> Step Internet,
> >serving the communities of the Palouse
> since 1994.
> >http://www.fsr.net <http://www.fsr.net/>
> >mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> >=======================================================
> >
> >
> >
> >---------------------------------
> >Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new
> car" smell?
> > Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos.
>
>
> =======================================================
> List services made available by First Step
> Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse
> since 1994.
> http://www.fsr.net <http://www.fsr.net/>
> mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car"
> smell?
> Check out new cars at Yahoo! Autos.
> <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=48245/*http://autos.yahoo.com/new_cars.html;_ylc=X3oDMTE1YW1jcXJ2BF9TAzk3MTA3MDc2BHNlYwNtYWlsdGFncwRzbGsDbmV3LWNhcnM->
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Connect to the next generation of MSN Messenger
> Get it now!
> <http://imagine-msn.com/messenger/launch80/default.aspx?locale=en-us&source=wlmailtagline>=======================================================
> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> http://www.fsr.net <http://www.fsr.net/>
> mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell?
> Check out new cars at Yahoo! Autos.
> <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=48245/*http://autos.yahoo.com/new_cars.html;_ylc=X3oDMTE1YW1jcXJ2BF9TAzk3MTA3MDc2BHNlYwNtYWlsdGFncwRzbGsDbmV3LWNhcnM->
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ======================================================= List services made available by First Step Internet, serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994. http://www.fsr.net <http://www.fsr.net/> mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================
>
>
> =======================================================
> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> http://www.fsr.net
> mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell?
> Check out new cars at Yahoo! Autos.
> <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=48245/*http://autos.yahoo.com/new_cars.html;_ylc=X3oDMTE1YW1jcXJ2BF9TAzk3MTA3MDc2BHNlYwNtYWlsdGFncwRzbGsDbmV3LWNhcnM->
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Invite your mail contacts to join your friends list with Windows Live
> Spaces. It's easy! Try it!
> <http://spaces.live.com/spacesapi.aspx?wx_action=create&wx_url=/friends.aspx&mkt=en-us>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20070429/042c4530/attachment-0001.html
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list