[Vision2020] This hook is going to tear my jaw

[Tony]

Hey Wally, Carl told me about you, your place of birth?  Guess that explains your poor grasp of English.  Anyhow, your spin regarding abortion is misleading.  You state, using the left's most revered cliché', that I am attempting to dictate what happens "within another person's body."  Wally boy, a doctor assisted abortion NEVER occurs inside a woman's body.  It comes from without and INTERRUPTS and TERMINATES the natural process taking place therein.

As concerns Iraq, two misleading suggestions - first, we certainly DO have the right to decide the course the world takes when the world is harboring a sociopathic and expansionist murderer like Saddam Hussein, the whole of radical Islam, or Adolph Hitler.  To ignore their designs and allow them to flourish unchallenged is to invite holocaust.  Second, you know damn good and well that BOTH democrats and republicans supported the use of force in Iraq based on the best available intelligence of the time indicating an Iraq/Al Qaeda link.


Catch a clue Professor.  I am not insulting a head garment when I use the term RAGHEAD.  I have nothing in particular against cloth of any weave.  I do have a problem with bloody bomb-throwers who target woman and children indiscriminately.  Said bombers generally wear rags around their heads.  If you as a Sikh find that troubling, get over it.  Freedom of speech and all...

The fact that cheeseburgers kill more of us than terrorism is an irrelevant distinction.  You do not impose your murderous will on me to compel me to eat at Mc Donald's.  And, my inarticulate friend, our constitutional rights are not under siege, terrorism is.  Some unprecedented accommodations must be made by the American people in order to facilitate the pursuit of these plotters by our intelligence services.  Only paranoid leftists with a dope garden out back would view such accommodation as a threat.

Avenging a failed assignation?  Really Doc, you might find remedial English helpful.  As for the Iraqi people under Saddam and his thugs, only an idiot would regard them as "moderately oppressed."  Rent one of the documentaries commonly available that reveal the horrendously oppressive terror waged by that regime.

As for your tantrum regarding my characterization of Professor Nick Mengele, don't feel bad, he's not the only loony tune in academia as you so aptly demonstrate.

Have a pleasant day.

-Tony




  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Walter Smith 
  To: vision2020 at moscow.com 
  Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 11:41 PM
  Subject: [Vision2020] This hook is going to tear my jaw


  Well, here I am again, back on the VisionCrack, once again. Will I ever learn?

  Tony,

  I do not take pride in cowering behind the faceless internet, but I find that I can say what I think, or say who I am, not both. As I said in the beginning, take my words with as large a grain of salt as you wish. And while I may expel a lot of verbiage, I'm rarely accused of being an intellectual, just incorrigibly verbose. 

  Did my ad-hominem rhetoric change you? Did my selective re-definitions actually serve any purpose? Do I look better in your eyes because of it? Are my any ideals closer to being achieved? As you seem to be the grand master of such tactics, perhaps you can explain why not. 

  Just what amongst your words do I see as deserving of such invective? Sorry, but I'm not feeling up to building Wally's concordance on the gospel according to Simpson today. I'll just try to paraphrase your views I find abhorrent in a way that attempts to cast my own in a good light, but do please correct me if I mis-represent your position. 

  You believe that government has (or the people have) a right to control what happens within another persons body?
  You believe that westerners (western leaders anyway, i.e. you know who) have the right to decide the course the world takes, and can freely attack those they personally dislike, so long as an unrelated third party commits an abomination upon them first? 
  You take deep pleasure in inexplicably insulting a common Sikh choice of headgear, due to inexcusable attacks upon us by psychotic Muslim extremists?
  You agree that preventing heinous terrorists from killing fewer of us than cancer, cars, or fast food, is more important than our constitutional rights? 
  You agree that avenging a failed assignation, and "liberating unto death" a moderately oppressed people, is worth more lives than we lost on 9/11, particularly the lives of those who would defend us?
  You think that short-term economic comfort, and occupational complacency, is worth more than the long-term employment that would be created by becoming a responsible species? (not to mention ensuring a habitable world for our descendants?) 
  You believe these represent rational conservative views? Not inane authoritarian ones?

  I think I have pretty well covered what I have against you personally, but to put it pseudo-succinctly: 
       Your perpetual failure to recognize just what your comparison of Prof. Gier to mengele actually constitutes disgusts me in ways I cannot adequately express. You make me sick. 

  In disgust,
  Anon



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  =======================================================
   List services made available by First Step Internet, 
   serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.   
                 http://www.fsr.net                       
            mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
  =======================================================
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20070423/2e9c6d2f/attachment.html