<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16414" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Hey Wally, Carl told me about you, your place of
birth? Guess that explains your poor grasp of English. Anyhow, your
spin regarding abortion is misleading. You state, using the left's most
revered cliché', that I am attempting to dictate what happens "within another
person's body." Wally boy, a doctor assisted abortion NEVER occurs inside
a woman's body. It comes from without and INTERRUPTS and TERMINATES
the natural process taking place therein.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>As concerns Iraq, two misleading suggestions
- first, we certainly DO have the right to decide the course the world
takes when the world is harboring a sociopathic and expansionist murderer like
Saddam Hussein, the whole of radical Islam, or Adolph Hitler. To ignore
their designs and allow them to flourish unchallenged is to invite
holocaust. Second, you know damn good and well that BOTH democrats and
republicans supported the use of force in Iraq based on the best available
intelligence of the time indicating an Iraq/Al Qaeda link.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Catch a clue Professor. I am not insulting a
head garment when I use the term RAGHEAD. I have nothing in particular
against cloth of any weave. I do have a problem with bloody bomb-throwers
who target woman and children indiscriminately. Said bombers generally
wear rags around their heads. If you as a Sikh find that troubling, get
over it. Freedom of speech and all...</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>The fact that cheeseburgers kill more of us than
terrorism is an irrelevant distinction. You do not impose your murderous
will on me to compel me to eat at Mc Donald's. And, my inarticulate
friend, our constitutional rights are not under siege, terrorism is. Some
unprecedented accommodations must be made by the American people in order to
facilitate the pursuit of these plotters by our intelligence services.
Only paranoid leftists with a dope garden out back would view
such accommodation as a threat.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Avenging a failed assignation? Really Doc,
you might find remedial English helpful. As for the Iraqi people under
Saddam and his thugs, only an idiot would regard them as "moderately
oppressed." Rent one of the documentaries commonly available that reveal
the horrendously oppressive terror waged by that regime.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>As for your tantrum regarding my characterization
of Professor Nick Mengele, don't feel bad, he's not the only loony tune in
academia as you so aptly demonstrate.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Have a pleasant day.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>-Tony</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=donn.nergal@gmail.com href="mailto:donn.nergal@gmail.com">Walter
Smith</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=vision2020@moscow.com
href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">vision2020@moscow.com</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, April 19, 2007 11:41
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [Vision2020] This hook is going
to tear my jaw</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>Well, here I am again, back on the VisionCrack, once again.
Will I ever learn?<BR><BR>Tony,<BR><BR>I do not take pride in cowering behind
the faceless internet, but I find that I can say what I think, or say who I
am, not both. As I said in the beginning, take my words with as large a grain
of salt as you wish. And while I may expel a lot of verbiage, I'm rarely
accused of being an intellectual, just incorrigibly verbose. <BR><BR>Did my
ad-hominem rhetoric change you? Did my selective re-definitions actually serve
any purpose? Do I look better in your eyes because of it? Are my any ideals
closer to being achieved? As you seem to be the grand master of such tactics,
perhaps you can explain why not. <BR><BR>Just what amongst your words do I see
as deserving of such invective? Sorry, but I'm not feeling up to building
Wally's concordance on the gospel according to Simpson today. I'll just try to
paraphrase your views I find abhorrent in a way that attempts to cast my own
in a good light, but do please correct me if I mis-represent your position.
<BR><BR>You believe that government has (or the people have) a right to
control what happens within another persons body?<BR>You believe that
westerners (western leaders anyway, i.e. you know who) have the right to
decide the course the world takes, and can freely attack those they personally
dislike, so long as an unrelated third party commits an abomination upon them
first? <BR>You take deep pleasure in inexplicably insulting a common Sikh
choice of headgear, due to inexcusable attacks upon us by psychotic Muslim
extremists?<BR>You agree that preventing heinous terrorists from killing fewer
of us than cancer, cars, or fast food, is more important than our
constitutional rights? <BR>You agree that avenging a failed assignation, and
"liberating unto death" a moderately oppressed people, is worth more lives
than we lost on 9/11, particularly the lives of those who would defend
us?<BR>You think that short-term economic comfort, and occupational
complacency, is worth more than the long-term employment that would be created
by becoming a responsible species? (not to mention ensuring a habitable world
for our descendants?) <BR>You believe these represent rational conservative
views? Not inane authoritarian ones?<BR><BR>I think I have pretty well covered
what I have against you personally, but to put it pseudo-succinctly:
<BR> Your perpetual failure to recognize just what
your comparison of Prof. Gier to mengele actually constitutes disgusts me in
ways I cannot adequately express. You make me sick. <BR><BR>In
disgust,<BR>Anon<BR>
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>=======================================================<BR> List
services made available by First Step Internet, <BR> serving the
communities of the Palouse since 1994.
<BR>
http://www.fsr.net
<BR>
mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<BR>=======================================================</BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>